The Edmond Sun

Nation & World

August 27, 2012

A fight over food labels in California

WASHINGTON — California’s Proposition 37 started out as one ex-farmer’s low-budget quest to get genetically modified foods labeled at the grocery store. Now, with less than three months until Election Day, it’s turning into a multimillion-dollar fight: the natural foods industry vs. agribusiness and biotech companies. So far, Prop. 37 opponents have spent nearly $25 million in an attempt to defeat the initiative.

If the “California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act” passes, California will become the first state in the nation to require that food manufacturers label all food, raw and processed, that contains ingredients made from genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The technique is used in the laboratory to create seeds that are, among other things, resistant to pesticides.

Proponents of the measure, including Pamm Larry, the onetime farmer/midwife who spearheaded the proposition, argue that Californians have a right to know what kinds of foods they are consuming. Opponents insist that requiring such labels would place an undue burden on food manufacturers and would cost consumers more at the checkout lane.

“This will send a very loud message,” Larry says. “I think once we get this voted on, other legislators (in other states) are going to start giving this another look. All eyes are on California. Once this happens, I believe there’s going to be a snowball effect.”

The pro-labeling side has not done well in efforts across the country so far. Labeling laws have failed in 19 states. Seventy percent of Oregon voters opposed a ballot initiative similar to California’s in 2002. This past April, Vermont’s House Agriculture committee voted 9-1 in favor of a labeling bill, but the legislation failed to make it to a floor vote. The same month, similar legislation stalled in Connecticut. But if Prop. 37 passes and two other New England states pass similar legislation, the Connecticut law will immediately go into effect.

“You’re not supposed to keep information from people in an open society,” says Rep. Richard Roy, a sponsor of the Connecticut labeling law. “I don’t know if GMOs are good, bad, indifferent. I just know they’re not telling us. And to me that is wrong.”

One reason for the misfire in Vermont, according to the Burlington Free Press, was Gov. Peter Shumlin’s concerns that a labeling law would not survive a constitutional challenge. Precedent shows that the governor’s concerns may have been well founded: A similar law requiring the labeling of bovine growth hormones was struck down in federal court in 1996.

The one anti-labeling voter on the Vermont House Agriculture Committee, Rep. Norm McAllister, is a dairy farmer who says he has used genetically modified corn to feed his livestock. He says a labeling requirement would hurt Vermont’s burgeoning special foods industry and might violate interstate commerce laws.

“People have phobias against a lot of things and they should have the right to know what’s in their food,” McAllister says. “But we cannot go it alone. We’re such a small state. I wasn’t worried about us dealing with Monsanto; I was worried about the (Justice Department).”

For the past 22 years, the Food and Drug Administration has held that genetically engineered food is safe, according to Michael Rodemeyer, a lecturer at the University of Virginia School of Engineering, and the former director of the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. Science, so far, has been inconclusive about the safety of genetically engineered foods, Rodemeyer says. The U.S. Department of Agriculture places some restrictions on genetically modified crops deemed to be harmful to other plants.

According to a report by the California Legislative Analyst’s Office in 2011, 88 percent of all corn and 94 percent of all soybeans grown in the United States come from genetically engineered seeds. Processed foods from Coca-Cola to frozen pizza typically contain some form of corn or soybeans, such as high fructose corn syrup, so most packaged goods contain GMOs. The Legislative Analyst’s Office concludes that 40-70 percent of food sold in California grocery stores have genetically modified ingredients. Certified organic food is GMO free.

The Legislative Analyst’s Office estimated that implementing Prop. 37 could cost taxpayers more than $1 million annually.

Fifty countries require labeling of genetically modified foods, including China and all of Europe. American companies selling their products in Europe change the formulations of products with genetically modified ingredients rather than labeling them, according to Rodemeyer.

Because California is such a large market, if Prop. 37 passes, companies might decide to label their products nationwide, rather than have separate procedures for goods sold in different states, says Bob Ehart, senior policy and science adviser at the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture.

The passing of Prop. 37 “could be a ricochet” at the national level, Ehart says. “It may end up being more cost-effective for them to comply with the California circumstances than not. I don’t think we know what the economic impact will be.”

The proposition would exempt from the labeling requirement any foods that are “certified organic or are unintentionally produced with genetically engineered material; made from animals fed or injected with genetically engineered material but not genetically engineered themselves; processed with or containing only small amounts of genetically engineered ingredients; administered for treatment of medical conditions; sold for immediate consumption such as in a restaurant; or alcoholic beverages.”

Food manufacturers would have up to 18 months to make their labeling compliant with the new law. They would be barred from advertising any genetically modified food as “natural.”

According to a poll conducted by the California Business Roundtable and Pepperdine University, 69 percent of Californians are in favor of Prop. 37. But over the coming weeks, it will face an intense campaign of opposition on the part of groups ranging from food and beverage companies to the Grocery Manufacturers Association to several California chapters of the NAACP. Monsanto, Dow and DuPont, leaders in biotechnology, have made hefty contributions to defeat the proposition: $4.2 million, $1 million and $4 million, respectively.

Financial backers on the pro side of the proposition include Mercola.com, a health products company; Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps; and Lundberg Family Farms.

“It’s just a simple issue of people to be able to choose what they want to eat,” says Grant Lundberg, CEO of Lundberg Family Farms, who donated roughly $250,000 in support of Prop. 37. “There isn’t an understanding of the long-term health and environmental impact and the impact on the food supply channel.”

Kathy Fairbanks, the spokeswoman for Say No to Prop. 37, counters that the law is deceptive and would provide loopholes for some foods and not others. Milk from cows that have eaten genetically modified food wouldn’t have to be labeled, while soy milk processed from genetically modified soybeans would. If Prop. 37 passes, she says, the law will open the door to excessive litigation.

“What this allows,” Fairbanks argues, “is a trial lawyer to grab a package of granola bars, flip over the back and potentially spot an ingredient that could be GE, like soybean oil. … The lawyer doesn’t have to have proof, can file a suit alleging label violation, can file a suit against the grocery store, against the processor … against the food distributor, all the way down to the family farmer who grew the corn.”

But Pamm Larry, the crusader who got the proposition on the ballot, says that farmers helped write the initiative. In January 2011, she says, she became troubled about what she saw as the unknowns of genetically modified foods.

“I decided that it was my job” to see that genetically engineered foods were labeled at the grocery store, Larry says. “It came to me as a lightning bolt realization.”

She traveled the state, forming alliances with different communities, until she’d created a grassroots movement of 90 different groups such as the Organic Consumer Association and Democracy Food Now. By May of this year, she’d collected more than the number of signatures needed to get Prop. 37 on the ballot. The Center for Food Safety helped draft the language. Larry says it was their intention to keep the law as simple as possible, without adding the burden of extra bureaucracy. The law, if passed, will be monitored by the California Department of Health.

1
Text Only
Nation & World
  • 3 Senate candidates say no to Sharia law

    Whether to deport non-citizen Muslim men in the U.S. who believe violence is justified by Sharia law was a question asked to three of the seven Republicans running for the U.S. Senate.
    The Oklahoma Conservative Political Action Committee hosted a debate recently in Oklahoma City. The office is being vacated by retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn.
    Congressman James Lankford said Great Britain has experimented with allowing certain pockets of their nation to function under Sharia law.

    April 22, 2014

  • Raw oysters spike U.S. rise in bacterial infections, CDC reports

    Raw oysters, so good with hot sauce, increasingly can carry something even more unsettling to the stomach: A bacteria linked to vomiting, diarrhea and pain.

    April 19, 2014

  • Kaiser joins Thunder ownership group

    Tulsa businessman George B. Kaiser has been approved by the NBA Board of Governors as a new partner in The Professional Basketball Club LLC, which owns the Oklahoma City Thunder. Thunder Chairman and CEO Clayton I. Bennett made the announcement Friday. Kaiser is purchasing the ownership interest of Tom L. Ward.
    “We are honored to welcome George Kaiser as a member of the ownership group of the Oklahoma City Thunder,” Bennett said. “George is a well-respected and important Oklahoma business leader, as well as one of the state and nation’s top philanthropists. His commitment to successful business and community leadership is in true alignment with that of the Thunder.
    “I also appreciate the commitment and leadership provided by Tom Ward as a member of our ownership group from the beginning,” Bennett added.

    April 18, 2014

  • VIDEO: Boston bomb scare defendant appears in court

    The man accused of carrying a backpack containing a rice cooker near the Boston Marathon finish line on the anniversary of the bombings was arraigned Wednesday. He's being held on $100,000 bail.

    April 18, 2014

  • MS_injection well.jpg Agency clarifies earthquake-related misinformation

    A state agency says misinformation related to the debate about the cause of more earthquakes across Central Oklahoma includes oil well types, well numbers and injection pressure.
    The Prague sequence of 2011 along the Wilzetta Fault zone included a significant foreshock, a main shock of magnitude 5.7 and numerous aftershocks. It has been suggested that this sequence represents tremors triggered by fluid injection.
    More recently, earthquakes have been recorded in the vicinity of Jones, Arcadia Lake, Edmond, Guthrie, Langston and Crescent. Regulators and scientists are working together to better understand what’s causing all the shaking.

    April 16, 2014 1 Photo

  • bomb1 VIDEO: A year after marathon bombing, Boston remains strong

    The City of Boston came together Tuesday to honor those who were injured and lost their lives at the Boston Marathon on the one-year anniversary of the bombing. While the day was sure to be emotional, those affected by last year's race are showing they won't let the tragedy keep them down.

    April 16, 2014 1 Photo

  • New study counters pot legalization argument

    A new study raises a strong challenge to the idea that casual marijuana use isn’t associated with bad consequences, a researcher says.
    Researchers say the findings suggest recreational marijuana use may lead to previously unidentified brain changes and highlight the importance of research aimed at understanding the long-term effects of low to moderate marijuana use on the brain.

    April 15, 2014

  • Anita Hill.jpg Anita Hill reflects on her fateful testimony, 23 years later

    Back in 1993, I rounded a corner of a Laguna Beach, Calif., grocery store and walked straight into Anita Hill.
    We both stopped in our tracks. She looked slightly panicked, like someone had turned on a light in a room, and all she wanted was the door.
    It took a moment to register that this was the woman who, just two years before, calmly testified before a Senate committee about the sexual harassment she endured while working for U.S. Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas  at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, of all places.

    April 15, 2014 1 Photo

  • jc_Erick Wyatt.JPG Norman man takes on challenge to unseat Inhofe

    EDITOR’S NOTE: This is one in a series of candidate profiles leading up to the 2014 Oklahoma elections.

    Erick Wyatt is running for U.S. Senate to be a strong voice of the people, he said. More than anything, Wyatt said he is running against incumbent U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe for the sake of his children.
    The Norman Republican vows to represent the people’s interests instead of the interests of powerful political groups, Wyatt said.

    April 14, 2014 1 Photo

  • 20140414_MALAYSIA_Bluefin.jpg In new phase to find Flight 370, search robot will enter ocean

    The pings have sputtered out in the multinational search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, forcing search crews to deploy an underwater robot to find a plane that’s eluded human efforts.
    In a last-ditch effort to find the Boeing 777 and its black box flight recorders, a U.S. Navy submersible vehicle will be used to scan an area in the southern Indian Ocean for debris.
    “We haven’t had a single detection in six days, so I guess it’s time to go underwater,” Angus Houston, who heads Australia’s Joint Agency Coordination Center, told a news conference in that country’s western city of Perth on Monday.

    April 14, 2014 1 Photo