The Edmond Sun

Opinion

December 13, 2013

Bringing fairness to both children and felons

EDMOND — Let me go out on a limb here and make a statement that is categorically true in all places, at all times. Life is not fair. Any person, even the least compassionate among us, must agree it isn’t “fair” for children to be born with disabilities. Those encumbered at birth with physical or psychological burdens play absolutely no role in causing the difficulties they’ll encounter during the course of their lives. No matter how we may rage against this unfairness, it is a fact we have to face and learn to cope with. We may do our best to lighten the load, that unfairness will always be theirs to bear.

Every day, innocent people are injured by the intentional or negligent acts of others or by the heedless operation of natural forces. Each time this occurs, we may rush to the support of the injured parties and protest against the unfairness of the situation. But what’s done can’t be undone. It isn’t fair, but it happened.

Unfortunately, Americans seem to be growing more accepting of certain kinds of unfairness where our children are concerned. At the same time, we stand by while employers are forced to bend over backwards to be sure there is no unfairness where convicted felons are concerned. Recent news items illustrate what I mean.

We’re all aware that in many of our schools, there’s a “no question asked, no explanation accepted, zero-tolerance” policy where sexual harassment and violence are concerned. Under these policies, a 6-year-old boy playfully kissing the hand of a schoolmate must be singled out for extraordinary discipline. Failure to mete out this discipline might draw the wrath of the federal government who could, pursuant to non-legislatively imposed guidelines, withdraw federal funding from the whole school. This, of course, is tantamount to punishing every student in the place. Naturally, this would be grossly unfair. But when it comes to schoolchildren, this type of unfairness seems to be perfectly acceptable.

In addition, any time there’s a fight on school grounds, many districts suspend both students involved, regardless of which one was the aggressor; no explanations, no tolerance, no exceptions. Even if an innocent student is simply defending himself/herself, suspension is imposed. To punish people for defending themselves against violent aggression is patently unfair. But when it comes to schoolchildren, again, taxpayers are expected to tolerate this unfairness. Every day there are examples of schoolchildren being stigmatized and punished for profoundly innocuous behaviors like shaping a pop tart, displaying a charm-sized futuristic ray gun or pointing a finger. These oppressive, hyper-technical rules produce many examples of unfair punishments imposed on children. But unfairness of this type, when forced on children, is expected to be overlooked and endured, if not supported. You get the picture. In the view of bureaucrats and social engineers, it’s OK to be unfair to the kids.

Now consider this. Some employers are as rigid about background checks as schools are about harassment and violence. Whereas the burden of rigid school rules falls on schoolchildren, the burden of rigid application of background checks falls on convicted felons. But, unlike schoolchildren, when unfairness falls on convicted felons, the government won’t tolerate it.

Last April, the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission determined that automatic exclusion of applicants with criminal records was unfair. Consequently, employers who have a zero tolerance position concerning the hiring of convicted felons run the risk of expensive burdensome enforcement action by the EEOC.

Recently, Greg Abbott, Texas attorney general, sued the EEOC claiming the commission was overreaching its authority. According to Attorney General Abbott’s lawsuit, the EEOC went too far when it tried to bully employers into dropping the “no tolerance” policy concerning hiring convicted felons.

What is the moral, legal and rational justification for being tougher on school kids than we are on criminals? Probably, opponents of strictly enforced “zero tolerance” policies have the better argument. There are compelling exceptions to every rule and the more fair decisions are based on the facts of the case. But it’s grossly unfair to approve zero-tolerance policies applied to children and bully employers into redrafting their hiring guidelines to avoid unfairness to felons.

Let’s acknowledge there will be instances where application of “zero tolerance” concerning the hiring of felons is unfair. People can change. A convicted felon may be rehabilitated and transformed into a very capable employee. But it makes more sense to expect adult criminals to live with the consequences of their decisions than to impose lifelong stigmata on little boys and girls for school yard pranks that really don’t hurt anyone. I’d like to have someone explain. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Is English getting dissed?

    Is the English language being massacred by the young, the linguistically untidy and anyone who uses the Internet? Absolutely.
    Is that anything new? Hardly.
    Many words and expressions in common parlance today would have raised the hackles of language scolds in the not-so-distant past. For evidence, let’s look at some examples from recent newspaper articles.

    July 31, 2014

  • 'Too big to fail' equals 'too eager to borrow'

    Four years ago this month, President Barack Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law, promising that the 848-page financial law would “put a stop to taxpayer bailouts once and for all,” he said. But recently, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren told a Detroit crowd that “the biggest banks are even bigger than they were when they got too big to fail in 2008.”
    Who’s right?

    July 30, 2014

  • Sheltons travel for better life for family

    Some time around 1865 a mixed-race African American couple, William and Mary Shelton, made their way from Mississippi to east Texas. Nothing is known for certain of their origins in he Magnolia state, or the circumstances under which they began their new lives in Texas.

    July 29, 2014

  • Film critic Turan produces book

    Kenneth Turan, who is the film critic for National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition,” has written a book “Not to be Missed, Fifty-Four Favorites from a Life Time of Film.” His list of movies span the gamut from the beginnings of filmmaking through the present day.
    There are some surprising omissions on his list. While he includes two films, “A Touch of Evil” and Chimes at Midnight” made by Orson Welles, and one, “The Third Man,” that Welles starred in but did not direct. He did not however, include “Citizen Kane,” that was the first movie Welles made, that is  often cited by both film critics and historians as a favorite film.

    July 28, 2014

  • Logan County’s disputed zone

    Watchers of “Star Trek” may recall the episode from the original series entitled, “Day of the Dove.” In this episode, Captain Kirk and his crew are forced by a series of circumstances into a confrontation with the Klingons. The conflict eventually resolves after Kirk realizes that the circumstances have been intentionally designed by an alien force which feeds off negative emotions, especially fear and anger. Kirk and his crew communicate this fact to the Klingons and the conflict subsides. No longer feeding upon confrontation, the alien force is weakened and successfully driven away.

    July 28, 2014

  • Russell leads in Sun poll

    Polling results of an unscientific poll at www.edmondsun.com show that Steve Russell, GOP candidate for the 5th District congressional seat, is in the lead with 57 percent of the vote ahead of the Aug. 26 runoff election. Thirty readers participated in the online poll.

    July 28, 2014

  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

  • Remembering lessons from 1974

    This week marks the 40th anniversary of an important milestone in America’s constitutional history. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to order the Nixon White House to turn over audiotapes that would prove the president and his close aides were guilty of criminal violations. This ruling established with crystal clarity that the executive branch could not hide behind the shield of executive privilege to protect itself from the consequences of illegal behavior. It was a triumph for the continued vitality of our constitutional form of government.

    July 25, 2014

  • RedBlueAmerica: Is parenting being criminalized in America?

    Debra Harrell was arrested recently after the McDonald’s employee let her daughter spend the day playing in a nearby park while she worked her shift. The South Carolina woman says her daughter had a cell phone in case of danger, and critics say that children once were given the independence to spend a few unsupervised hours in a park.
    Is it a crime to parent “free-range” kids? Does Harrell deserve her problems? Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuk, the RedBlueAmerica columnists, debate the issue.

    July 24, 2014

Poll

The runoff race for the 5th District congressional seat is set for Aug. 26. If the voting were today, which candidate would you support?

Al McAffrey
Tom Guild
Undecided
     View Results