The Edmond Sun

Opinion

January 3, 2014

It’s unreasonable to fund drug addicts

EDMOND — On New Year’s Day, UPI ran a report concerning a federal judge’s ruling which struck down a Florida statute requiring some applicants for welfare to submit to drug testing. Details were sketchy, but the broad outlines seem to run like this.

In 2011, the Florida Legislature passed a law mandating that parents applying for a program called “Temporary Assistance for Needy Families,” must submit to and pay for a drug test. If the results are negative, costs of the test are refunded. If the test verified drug use by the applicant, benefits are denied and reapplication is not permitted for a year.

Shortly after the act was passed, the ACLU challenged the law on behalf of Navy veteran, Luis Lebron, a single-parent of a son who was five years old when Lebron refused to take the test. Due to his refusal, Florida denied the requested welfare assistance.

On New Year’s Day, 2014, U.S. District Judge Mary Scriven permanently halted the law’s enforcement saying, “The court finds there is no set of circumstances under which the warrantless suspicionless drug testing at issue in this case could be constitutionally applied.”

Opponents of the law pointed out, of the about 4,000 applicants tested, less than 3 percent produced positive results — which, they say, is lower than the percentage of drug use in the general population. In dollars and cents terms, these opponents assert that Florida spent more on drug testing than it saved on cutting benefits.

Lebron, the nominal plaintiff reportedly stated: “The new law assumes that everyone who needs a little help has a drug problem… It’s wrong and unfair. It judges a whole group of people on their temporary economic status.”

This issue could be approached from too many angles to cover them all here; but let’s hit some highlights.

COST: It’s misleading to say the drug testing costs more than it saves. That could only be established by knowing how many people knew they wouldn’t pass the test and chose not to apply. Putting the emotional issues aside and focusing strictly on dollars and cents, the real savings cannot be calculated without knowing how many drug users were deterred from the application process.

ASSUMPTIONS: Mr. Lebron is dead wrong in leveling the emotional accusation that drug testing assumes poor people are drug users. Every applicant for a driver’s license is required to take a visual exam. This is not because the state assumes every applicant for a driver’s license is blind. The test is simply used to determine which applicants qualify for a license and which do not. The people of Florida made the policy decision certain people qualified for taxpayer assistance and some did not. The drug test, like the visual exam, simply determines which is which. To say the drug test makes negative assumptions about people is an assertion way too thin-skinned than the facts warrant.

“IT’S WRONG AND UNFAIR:” These days, the default position for anyone who doesn’t get their way is, “It’s unfair.” Anyone who raises a child through puberty is thoroughly soaked with this refrain every time a teenager is told, “No.” But is it really unfair to ask an applicant for public assistance to take a drug test?  Assume that taxpayers are happy to help folks when their resources are inadequate. Is it wrong for taxpayers to insist — as a condition for their help — that the applicant not use taxpayer assistance as a partial underwriting for drug use? Put it another way. Is it fair to demand that taxpayers foot part of the applicant’s drug bill?  

Let’s not lose sight of a simple fact. If the applicant is clean, then taxpayers jump in and help out. If the applicant has enough money for drugs, they can’t demand the taxpayers pick up part of the drug tab.

Applicants are asking (demanding?) that taxpayers write them a check. In the world of work, employers all over the country condition writing a paycheck on the employees’ taking and passing a drug test. Why should these applicants be granted an artificial shield from the consequences of their behavior when that shield is not available to working Americans?

UNCONSTITUTIONAL: The judge’s ruling is only defensible if Florida’s requirement of a drug test is “unreasonable.” “Irritating is not the standard. Let’s not slow down to discuss the irritating, invasive forms the taxing authorities require us to complete as a condition of allowing us to keep what we earn. “Unfair” is not the standard. The test is “unreasonable.”

So really, is it unreasonable to ask an applicant for assistance to take a drug test? What do you think? I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond   resident.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • New Orleans features its own “Running of the Bulls”

    On July12, the streets of the Warehouse District of New Orleans were filled with thousands of young men who were seeking to avoid being hit with plastic bats wielded by women on roller skates as part of the annual “Running of the Bulls” that takes place in New Orleans.
    The event is based on the “Running of the Bulls” that occurs in Pamplona, Spain, that is  part of an annual occurrence in which a group of bulls rampage through the streets of Pamplona while men run from them to avoid being gored by their sharp horns. That event was introduced to the English-speaking world by Ernest Hemingway, who included scenes from it in his critically acclaimed 1926 novel “The Sun also Rises.”

    July 22, 2014

  • OTHER VIEW: Newsday: Lapses on deadly diseases demand explanation

    When we heard that the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had created a potentially lethal safety risk by improperly sending deadly pathogens — like anthrax — to other laboratories around the country, our first reaction was disbelief.

    July 22, 2014

  • Holding government accountable for open meeting violations

    A few weeks ago I wrote about the recent success of three important government transparency proposals which will go into law this year.

    July 21, 2014

  • GUEST OPINION — Oklahoma GOP voters want educational choices

    A Braun Research survey released in January showed that Oklahoma voters — Republicans, Democrats, and Independents alike — favor parental choice in education.

    July 21, 2014

  • HEY HINK: IRS interferes with citizens’ rights of free speech

    The patient is gravely ill. We have detected traces of a deadly venom in the bloodstream. We don’t know how widespread the poison is, but we know, if not counteracted, toxins of this kind can rot the patient’s vital organs and could ultimately prove fatal.

    July 19, 2014

  • 130408_NT_BEA_good kids We're raising a generation of timid kids

    A week ago, a woman was charged with leaving her child in the car while she went into a store. Her 11-year-old child. This week, a woman was arrested for allowing her 9-year-old daughter to go to the park alone. Which raises just one question: America, what the heck is wrong with you?

    July 17, 2014 1 Photo

  • RedBlueAmerica: What should the U.S. do about illegal immigrant children?

    The crisis along the southern U.S. border has politicians and immigration officials scrambling. More than 52,000 children, mostly from Central American nations, have arrived so far this year. The Department of Homeland Security is running out of space to hold them all.
    President Barack Obama is asking Congress for $3.7 billion in borrowed money from taxpayers to cover the growing “care, feeding and transportation costs of unaccompanied children and family groups” when our own veterans are not taken care of. Texas Gov. Rick Perry criticized the president’s plan, saying more money should go toward securing the border.

    July 17, 2014

  • VA scandal highlights the need to change Pentagon spending priorities

    The ongoing Department of Veterans Affairs scandal raises an important question: When our veterans are being denied access to basic health care, why is the Pentagon squandering billions of dollars on programs that do not benefit our military forces? Is there a link in organization attitudes?

    July 16, 2014

  • For better politics, it’s time for some raging moderates

    Like more than 20 percent of my fellow Californians, I am now classified as a no-party-preference voter, registered to vote but with no affiliation to any of the state’s political parties.
    I am for lower taxes and for marriage equality. I am tough on crime and I am anti-abortion. I believe that a pathway to citizenship is a necessary part of immigration reform and that student test scores should be a critical component of teacher evaluations.

    July 15, 2014

  • Father on mission to stop gun violence

    Since his son died six weeks ago as collateral damage to a troubled young man’s wish for vengeance, Richard Martinez has been asked whom he holds responsible.
    “I’m responsible,” the California lawyer answers, referring to most Americans’ failure to push harder to change gun laws after earlier mass shootings. “All those kids died and none of us did anything.”

    July 14, 2014

Poll

If the Republican runoff for the 5th District congressional seat were today, which candidate would you vote for?

Patrice Douglas
Steve Russell
Undecided
     View Results