The Edmond Sun


January 10, 2014

HEY HINK: Government should not punish groups out of existence

EDMOND — Let’s reflect on an uncomfortable fact. Every government harbors within it, the seeds of tyranny. The reason is simple. In order for government to preserve itself, it must have power to command; “Obey or be punished.” While government may cajole, educate, admonish, encourage and beseech it’s finished if it cannot issue commands and back those commands with believable threat of punishment.

The founders of this country recognized the need for government. They also knew the nature of government. Unchecked, government will always make increasing demands on a larger share of the people’s resources. Unchecked, the government will go to greater and greater lengths to control the lives of the citizens enforcing obedience by threats of punishment. For this reason, the founders sought to confine our government’s power to those limited areas where it was needed and to establish sharp limits to keep government out of the people’s private affairs.

Theoretically, in this country, demands for obedience to the government do not put citizens at risk of violating religious conviction.

This is on my mind this week as I observe ideological and judicial storm clouds gathering over “The Little Sisters of the Poor.” This is an organization of Catholic women whose nursing homes minister to the elderly poor. Their website lists almost 30 nursing homes in the United States stretching from California to Rhode Island. According to their mission statement, this is an international congregation founded in 1839 by St. Jeanne Jugan currently assisting the elderly poor in more than 30 countries. “… Our mission is to offer the neediest elderly of every race and religion a home where they will be welcomed as Christ, cared for as family and accompanied with dignity until God calls them to himself.”

Whatever differences we may have with these people, everyone should agree their compassionate commitment to providing help to the underprivileged elderly is an extremely commendable endeavor.

This group is in the news because they are under pressure from the United States government to, “Obey or be punished.” Our government has issued an ultimatum. “Sign our document or be penalized out of existence — at least out of existence in the United States of America.”

In a nutshell, here’s the context. The Little Sisters are opposed, on religious grounds, to birth control and abortion. So far as I can tell, the sincerity of their beliefs in this regard haven’t been seriously challenged anywhere in the world. For purposes of this discussion, my opinions and your opinions on the merits of this belief are irrelevant. It only matters that they believe it.

These religious ladies believe they would be committing a sin if they participate, in any way, in providing contraception or abortion services to anyone. Some provisions of Obamacare require all employers in this country to provide employees with free contraception. The Little Sisters, morally, can’t do it. So the government provides an exemption to some religious organizations allowing them to sign a government-approved waiver. This waiver authorizes a third party to provide contraception services. But the Little Sisters insist they cannot, morally, authorize a third-party to engage in conduct that they themselves find sinful. Failure to sign the government-approved waiver will result in fines that may overwhelm and ultimately terminate the Little Sisters’ activities in the United States.

The Little Sisters filed a lawsuit arguing that Obamacare places them in a morally untenable position. They cannot obey, but they must obey or be punished. Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor has issued an order temporarily rescuing the Little Sisters from their moral dilemma.

Critics of the lawsuit have pointed out that an overwhelming number of Catholic women in the United States use or have used contraceptives. With all due respect, this is thoroughly irrelevant. Our Constitution absolutely forbids imposing majority rule on private religious conviction. Even if the Little Sisters were the only women on earth who adhere to this religious conviction, it would be our obligation to defend them and that conviction.

Other critics bemoan the fact that the lawsuit is being funded by a conservative organization. Again, the source of the funding is entirely irrelevant. The proper focus is on the issues raised by the litigation.

Finally, some critics argue that the Little Sisters are attempting to impose their religious beliefs on others. I fail to see how steadfast refusal to sign a government form would fall into that category. These are precisely the kinds of intrusive federal ultimatums that our Constitution was crafted to avoid. Our government has no right to say to this religious organization, “Obey! Sign our form or be punished out of existence.” I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

Text Only
  • The pessimist’s guide to grizzly bears and Earth Day

    This coming Friday, to “celebrate Earth Day,” the Walt Disney Co. will release one of those cutesy, fun-for-all-ages, nature documentaries. “Bears” is about grizzly bears.
    The trailer says, “From DisneyNature comes a story that all parents share. About the love, the joy, the struggle and the strength it takes to raise a family.”
    Talk about your misguided “Hollywood values.” I previously have acknowledged a morbid, unreasonable fear of grizzly bears, stemming from a youth misspent reading grisly grizzly-attack articles in Readers Digest. This fear is only morbid and unreasonable because I live about 1,500 miles from the nearest wild grizzly bear. Still. ...

    April 16, 2014

  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

  • Los Angeles Times: Congress extend jobless benefits again

    How’s this for irony: Having allowed federal unemployment benefits to run out in December, some lawmakers are balking at a bill to renew them retroactively because it might be hard to figure out who should receive them. Congress made this task far harder than it should have been, but the technical challenges aren’t insurmountable. Lawmakers should restore the benefits now and leave them in place until the unemployment rate reaches a more reasonable level.

    April 14, 2014

  • Many nations invested in Israel

    Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yoram Ettinger recently spoke to a gathering at the Chabad Center for Jewish Life and Learning in Oklahoma City. The event began with a presentation by Rabbi Ovadia Goldman, who told the attendee that the  upcoming Jewish holiday of Passover was an occasion for them to embrace the children of God, which is all of humanity.

    April 14, 2014

  • Coming soon: More ways to get to know your doctor

    Last week, the federal government released a massive database capable of providing patients with much more information about their doctors.
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government agency that runs Medicare, is posting on its website detailed information about how many visits and procedures individual health professionals billed the program for in 2012, and how much they were paid.
    This new trove of data, which covers 880,000 health professionals, adds to a growing body of information available to patients who don’t want to leave choosing a doctor to chance. But to put that information to good use, consumers need to be aware of what is available, what’s missing and how to interpret it.

    April 14, 2014

  • HEY HINK: Hateful bullies attempt to muffle free speech

    Hopefully we agree it should be a fundamental right to voice criticism of any religion you wish. And you should have the right to sing the praises of any religion you choose. If criticism of religion is unjust, feel free to make your best argument to prove it. If criticism is just, don’t be afraid to acknowledge and embrace it. If songs of praise are merited, feel free to join in. If not, feel free to ignore them. But no American should participate in curbing free speech just because expression of religious views makes someone uncomfortable.

    April 11, 2014

  • Putting Oklahoma parents in charge

    Oklahoma’s public schools serve many children very well. Still, for various reasons, some students’ needs are better met in private schools, in virtual schools or elsewhere. That is why two state lawmakers have introduced legislation to give parents debit cards, literally, to shop for the educational services that work best for their children.

    April 11, 2014

  • Israelis, Palestinians are losing their chance

    Developments in the Middle East suggest that prospects of success for the Israeli-Palestinian talks, to which Secretary of State John Kerry has devoted countless hours and trips, are weakening.

    April 11, 2014

  • Teens might trade naked selfies for mugshots

    Will teenagers ever learn? You think yours will. Maybe so. But it's likely that was also the hope of the parents of children who were so shamed by nude photos of themselves that went south - how else can they go - that they killed themselves.

    April 11, 2014

  • Tax deadline and no reform in sight

    The annual tax filing deadline, which comes next Tuesday, provides a good opportunity for tax reform advocates to decry the current law’s increasing complexity and inequities, and to urge enactment of a simpler, fairer system.

    April 10, 2014


Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

     View Results