The Edmond Sun


October 11, 2012

Romney’s debate bounce even bigger

LOS ANGELES — Last week’s debate between President Obama and Mitt Romney was an even bigger win for Romney than it appeared at the time. That’s what the polls are telling us.

The debate, it seems, prompted swing voters to take a second look at the GOP candidate, and it also boosted Republican voters’ resolve to get out and vote.

As a result, a presidential election that once appeared to favor Obama is now razor close again, and heading toward an unpredictable finish.

Four national polls released their first post-debate findings this week. The Pew Research Center reported that Romney had moved into the lead among likely voters, 49 percent to 45 percent. The Gallup Poll reported that Romney held a narrow lead, 49 percent to 47 percent. The Rasmussen Poll, which sometimes appears to favor Republicans, was kinder to Obama this time; it reported a tie at 48 percent each. And Reuters/IPSOS reported a tie at 45 percent.

The usual words of caution apply: These numbers are fallible snapshots of public opinion, not predictions of election outcomes. All polls come with a margin of error; the Pew survey’s margin of 3.4 percent means that Romney’s apparent 4-point lead could be either an even-larger advantage, or a virtual tie.

But when four major polls move in the same direction, it’s no mirage. The Romney campaign found new momentum in last week’s debate, and Obama hasn’t yet stopped it. Moreover, the Pew poll included fascinating data that suggest some of the reasons for Romney’s advance.

One was a swing toward the Republican candidate on the issue of jobs, a word Romney used over and over in last week’s debate.

When Pew asked voters which candidate would do better on jobs, 49 percent named Romney against only 41 percent for Obama. Last month, when Pew asked the same question, the two candidates were tied. And when voters were asked whether they think Obama knows how to turn the economy around, most said he does not, 54 percent to 44 percent.

The poll also reported a notable swing toward Romney among women. In a Pew poll last month, Obama had an 18 percent advantage among female voters; this week, women were evenly divided, 47 percent to 47 percent.

The news wasn’t all good for Romney, though. When voters were asked which candidate connects well with ordinary Americans, Obama was still far ahead. But on criteria that have often been more important to voters, such as whether a candidate is a strong leader or knows how to fix the economy, Romney appeared either even or ahead of the incumbent.

And pollsters reported that last week’s drop in the unemployment rate to 7.8 percent didn’t appear to help Obama much if at all.

It’s hard to know exactly what’s driving the shift in momentum we’re seeing in the polls. But here’s a working theory based on conversations with ordinary voters and strategists in both campaigns.

All summer long, the Obama campaign waged an effective blitz of advertising that made Romney into a caricature of a wealthy conservative with overseas bank accounts and secret tax records.

And Romney, unaccountably, pitched in to help. He delayed the inevitable release of his tax returns for months. He staged a Republican convention that reaffirmed his conservative credentials but offered thin gruel for swing voters. And he was caught on videotape dismissing almost half of Americans as people without a sense of personal responsibility.

That made the Obama campaign’s task seem easy: keep driving Romney’s negatives up.

But once the two candidates met on an equal footing in Denver, many voters were amazed to meet a Romney who seemed like an earnest businessman looking for ways to fix the economy — a Romney who insisted that, contrary to his previously stated positions, he didn’t want to cut taxes for the wealthy, abandon health-care reform or reduce education spending (issues that polls find especially important to female voters).

Equally important, voters saw an incumbent president who, after reading last month’s lopsided polls in his favor, appeared to think he didn’t need to refresh his year-old talking points or break a sweat in his rebuttals.

The result was a debate that not only showed Romney at his best but reminded voters of Obama’s biggest vulnerability: that the economy is still ailing nearly four years into his term.

And that’s what produced this week’s remarkable poll numbers, and a reprieve from conservative conspiracy theories charging that the pollsters were cooking their numbers to make Obama look good.

Before last week’s debate, historians and pundits warned that debates rarely change the course of a campaign. This time turned out to be one of the exceptions. Obama needs to hope next week’s rematch also defies expectation and changes minds — this time with him as the beneficiary. But to do that, he’s going to need more than just crisper rebuttals to Romney’s best zingers.

He’ll need to remind swing voters why they once admired him.

He’ll need to make his economic plan sound fresh and promising.

He’ll need to present himself in a way that makes swing voters take a second look.

In other words, he’ll need to do just what Romney managed to do in Denver.

DOYLE MCMANUS is a columnist for The Los Angeles Times. Readers may send him email at

Text Only
  • AGAINST THE GRAIN: Author’s account of Johannesburg features growing pains

    American journalist Douglas Foster wrote in “After Mandela, The Struggle For Equality in Post- Apartheid South Africa” of the City of Johannesburg in South Africa that “It does not have a humble bone in its body.” And Johannesburg native Mark Gevisser recently has authored a memoir titled, “Lost And Found In Johannesburg” in which he gives some insight into the civic pride of that city.

    July 8, 2014

  • Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: A robust armed force for Japan could be a plus for the U.S.

    Japan, changing course from its post-1945 posture of pacificism, is turning toward assuming a more vigorous military posture.

    July 8, 2014

  • Oklahoma’s iron triangle resists educational choice

    Survey data continually show that Oklahomans favor policies that give parents more educational options. However, enacting those policies has proven to be difficult. A simple metaphor can help explain why.

    July 7, 2014

  • Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: Boehner’s lawsuit against Obama is a bad move

    Most Americans would agree that this nation has too much partisanship and too many lawsuits. In announcing recently that he will seek legislation for the House of Representatives to sue President Barack Obama, Speaker John Boehner embraces a double dose of negativity.

    July 7, 2014

  • Rise of regional government may prove taxing

    I recently have written about bills from the last legislative session, which mostly escape wide public purview but contain far-reaching policy. The news has been mostly positive as I have either described harmful bills that were defeated, or good policy that won approval.
    Now for some bad news.

    July 7, 2014

  • HEY HINK: Dissenters from all sides should read Hobby Lobby ruling fully before judging

    This May, the Crown Publishing Group published Timothy Geithner’s book, “Stress Test,” which covers some aspects of his tenure as Secretary of the Treasury in the Obama administration. One episode he covers relates to the prep he received from Dan Pfeiffer prior to Geithner’s appearance on a series of Sunday TV talk shows. At the time, Pfeiffer was President Obama’s senior advisor.

    July 3, 2014

  • The American way of war: It may surprise you

    When you study how the U.S. goes to war, there is a prevalent though not perfect pattern. The triggering event is often a sudden crisis that galvanizes popular opinion and becomes the immediate occasion for military intervention but subsequently is exposed as a misguided perception or outright fabrication.

    July 3, 2014

  • Get ready for an even bigger threat to Obamacare

    Now that the Supreme Court has issued its ruling in the Hobby Lobby case, the legal fight over the Affordable Care Act will shift a few blocks away to another Washington courtroom, where a far more fundamental challenge to Obamacare is about to be decided by the powerful U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Indeed, if Hobby Lobby will create complications for Obamacare, Halbig v. Burwell could trigger a full cardiac arrest.

    July 3, 2014

  • Happy birthday, America. Now legalize fireworks.

    Through the smoke of Roman candles and bottle rockets, the absurdity of Americans' obsession with do-it-yourself explosives is nonetheless clear: One day each year, we gather with neighbors, friends and loved ones to blow stuff up in our backyards. Go, U.S.A.!

    July 3, 2014

  • POWER OF PERSUASION: What does the flag symbolize?

    Many pastors have mixed feelings about the Fourth of July. Some even arrange their schedules so that they will be off on Fourth of July weekend.
    Worship services often feature lots of flags and patriotic songs. The flag has become a symbol that represents different things to different people. It can be divisive instead of bringing us together.

    July 2, 2014


U.S. Senate candidates Randy Brogdon, U.S. Rep. James Lankford and state Rep. T.W. Shannon recently discussed their views about the Federal Reserve and its monetary policies at a forum. All three called for an audit of the banking institution. Do you agree?

Yes, there should be an audit of the Federal Reserve
No, an audit is not necessary
     View Results