The Edmond Sun

Opinion

September 28, 2012

Examining presidential promises

EDMOND — The presidential debates are coming up. So let’s take a minute or two and talk about it. If you believe the polls, most American voters have their minds made up already. All their chosen candidate has to do is show up and survive and their vote is locked.

Some early decisions are based on the most superficial of considerations. It’s easy to “preach to the choir.” Presumably, they’re all true believers and don’t require much persuasion. There are constituents that are “single issue” voters. Whoever makes the most convincing promises regarding that make-or-break special interest will get the vote — period. To win these voters, the candidate must recite the mantra — whether he believes it or not — and add them to the tally.

Then there are voters who ask the candidate “what’s in it for me?” To win these voters, the candidate who promises the most attractive basket of “goodies” is their man. Realistic prospects for delivering these “goodies” are, unimportant. Their vote is assured.

Unfortunately, there are blocks of voters who will vote for the candidate with the “right” skin color. A side-by-side photo is all they need to pick their candidate. And, of course, there are party stalwarts who cast their vote along party lines, no matter what. These are “rah rah go team” voters who uncritically swallow the party line and blindly ignore controverting evidence. For these voters, no need to do any “tire kicking” at all. Their minds are made up.

There are, on the other hand, some voters who are withholding judgment until they can observe the candidates side-by-side and assess the credibility of their real-time responses to the same questions. To these cautious voters — to all voters really — there are some important factors to keep in mind. First and foremost, talk is cheap.

It’s easy to make expansive promises and boast of great things to come. It’s easy to recite the magic mantra that’s music to the ears of myopic monovision voters. It’s easy to tell a good story. Anyone who’s been taken in by a con man knows that believability is their bread and butter. They are experts at projecting trustworthiness. They will never succeed in getting their hands in our pockets unless they convince us they are capable and well-meaning. And, I can tell you from experience, the very best con men prosper from return business. They always deliver just enough on the con to keep our eyesight slightly shaded.

With this in mind, let’s not be unduly impressed with high profile promises. Both these candidates have long histories of making promises. President Obama made promises in order to be elected in 2008. He’s making promises now. Mr. Romney made promises to voters of Massachusetts in order to be elected governor and he, too, is making promises now. As we assess the promises we’re hearing, realizing they’re both real good promisers, let’s measure how they delivered on promises in the past. If we detect a pattern of unfulfilled promises, we have every right to be skeptical of the promises we’re hearing now.

But apart from promises, these candidates will be making statements of fact about themselves, their accomplishments and their opponents. They will all be believable. We must ask ourselves, “Has this person made a practice of hiding the real truth? Has this person made a practice of distorting the facts? Has this person, by his silence, attempted to exploit the advantages of damaging lies? Has this person told us lies himself?” If the answer to these questions is “yes,” our experience tells us we’re being set up for another con-job this time.

There’s another point to keep in mind. An artful dodger can find a plausible excuse for any failure. It’s always going to be someone else’s fault or circumstances beyond our control. Anyone applying for a hard job is expected to be capable of assessing the difficulties to be encountered. If they get half-way through the task and realize it can’t be done in the allotted time, why not? Did they not do their homework before they gave us their “bid” for the job? Were there unforeseen factors that were invisible? Some commitments are foolishly made and, sometimes, there are legitimate excuses why something can’t be carried out on time. Whenever someone makes a commitment and fails to follow through, they’d better have an excuse and it better be good.

I am 85 percent convinced who I’m voting for in November. I can back up my decision with facts. That’s our job as voters. Hopefully, all these reasons will be crystallized and highlighted for undecided voters during the debates. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is an Edmond resident and retired attorney.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Technology that will stimulate journalism’s future is now here

    To say technology has changed the newspaper media industry is understating the obvious. While much discussion focuses on how we read the news, technology is changing the way we report the news. The image of a reporter showing up to a scene with a pen and a pad is iconic but lost to the vestiges of time.
    I am asked frequently about the future of newspapers and, in particular, what does a successful future look like. For journalists, to be successful is to command multiple technologies and share news with readers in new and exciting ways.

    July 23, 2014

  • New Orleans features its own “Running of the Bulls”

    On July12, the streets of the Warehouse District of New Orleans were filled with thousands of young men who were seeking to avoid being hit with plastic bats wielded by women on roller skates as part of the annual “Running of the Bulls” that takes place in New Orleans.
    The event is based on the “Running of the Bulls” that occurs in Pamplona, Spain, that is  part of an annual occurrence in which a group of bulls rampage through the streets of Pamplona while men run from them to avoid being gored by their sharp horns. That event was introduced to the English-speaking world by Ernest Hemingway, who included scenes from it in his critically acclaimed 1926 novel “The Sun also Rises.”

    July 22, 2014

  • OTHER VIEW: Newsday: Lapses on deadly diseases demand explanation

    When we heard that the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had created a potentially lethal safety risk by improperly sending deadly pathogens — like anthrax — to other laboratories around the country, our first reaction was disbelief.

    July 22, 2014

  • Holding government accountable for open meeting violations

    A few weeks ago I wrote about the recent success of three important government transparency proposals which will go into law this year.

    July 21, 2014

  • GUEST OPINION — Oklahoma GOP voters want educational choices

    A Braun Research survey released in January showed that Oklahoma voters — Republicans, Democrats, and Independents alike — favor parental choice in education.

    July 21, 2014

  • HEY HINK: IRS interferes with citizens’ rights of free speech

    The patient is gravely ill. We have detected traces of a deadly venom in the bloodstream. We don’t know how widespread the poison is, but we know, if not counteracted, toxins of this kind can rot the patient’s vital organs and could ultimately prove fatal.

    July 19, 2014

  • 130408_NT_BEA_good kids We're raising a generation of timid kids

    A week ago, a woman was charged with leaving her child in the car while she went into a store. Her 11-year-old child. This week, a woman was arrested for allowing her 9-year-old daughter to go to the park alone. Which raises just one question: America, what the heck is wrong with you?

    July 17, 2014 1 Photo

  • RedBlueAmerica: What should the U.S. do about illegal immigrant children?

    The crisis along the southern U.S. border has politicians and immigration officials scrambling. More than 52,000 children, mostly from Central American nations, have arrived so far this year. The Department of Homeland Security is running out of space to hold them all.
    President Barack Obama is asking Congress for $3.7 billion in borrowed money from taxpayers to cover the growing “care, feeding and transportation costs of unaccompanied children and family groups” when our own veterans are not taken care of. Texas Gov. Rick Perry criticized the president’s plan, saying more money should go toward securing the border.

    July 17, 2014

  • VA scandal highlights the need to change Pentagon spending priorities

    The ongoing Department of Veterans Affairs scandal raises an important question: When our veterans are being denied access to basic health care, why is the Pentagon squandering billions of dollars on programs that do not benefit our military forces? Is there a link in organization attitudes?

    July 16, 2014

  • For better politics, it’s time for some raging moderates

    Like more than 20 percent of my fellow Californians, I am now classified as a no-party-preference voter, registered to vote but with no affiliation to any of the state’s political parties.
    I am for lower taxes and for marriage equality. I am tough on crime and I am anti-abortion. I believe that a pathway to citizenship is a necessary part of immigration reform and that student test scores should be a critical component of teacher evaluations.

    July 15, 2014

Poll

If the Republican runoff for the 5th District congressional seat were today, which candidate would you vote for?

Patrice Douglas
Steve Russell
Undecided
     View Results