The Edmond Sun

Opinion

January 11, 2013

Who knew coffee was so revolutionary?

EDMOND — Let’s take a couple of minutes to talk about the relationship between coffee and misguided government. We’ll start with some general observations. First, for millions of us, coffee is among life’s great pleasures. One of the most satisfying activities a person can do — alone — is settle into a warm spot on a snowy day with a good book, some uplifting music and a hot cup of strong coffee.

What does this have to do with misguided government? Bear with me.

This is, admittedly, an oversimplification, but there are basically three types of government agenda operating in a democratic republic. First, one that’s good for the government and good for the people. Rigorous public education comes to mind. If the electorate is well grounded in the pitfalls of history and the mechanics of civil participation, that electorate is more likely to make wise choices leading to competent, responsible governance.

Next, an agenda may be good for the people and problematic for the government. Protection of free speech is an example. All governments make mistakes. All governments get heartburn when these mistakes are pointed out and freely discussed by an electorate having the power to change the government.

Then, there are agendas that are bad for the government and the people. Take Prohibition for example. This boondoggle unleashed a criminal scourge and promoted the growth of pseudo-governments operated by ruthless gangsters that, in some ways, exercised more power over people than federal, state and local authorities.

Now, about that coffee. When coffee first came to the attention of the authorities in Yemen, it was welcomed as a miracle drug. Sheik Omar, who gets credit for discovering coffee roasting and brewing, was granted sainthood by those grateful authorities. The government said “Coffee is good.”

In time, Yemeni authorities realized coffee’s potential commercial value. Desiring to create and maintain a “miracle drug” monopoly, they outlawed the export of any coffee seeds capable of producing live plants. The government said “The coffee trade must be controlled.”

In the early 1500s, coffee houses appeared in Mecca. As coffee promoted animated conversation and this conversation often turned to politics, the imams of Mecca grew fearful of these gatherings and banned coffee in 1511. The government said “Coffee drinkers are troublemakers and must be silenced.”

As coffee drinking spread into the Christian world, nervous clerics banned coffee because it was “a Muslim drink.” The government said “Coffee is unchristian and must be forbidden.”

Later, in 1600, over sharp objection from devout clergyman, Pope Clement VIII declared that coffee was, in fact, a Christian beverage. The government said “Coffee is redeemed. It is no longer heathen, so it’s OK.” Even so, Ethiopian Orthodox Christians prohibited coffee as a “Muslim drink” as late as 1889.

In 1670, Yemen still prohibited the export of coffee seeds. According to legend, Sufi Baba Budam strapped seven live coffee seeds to his chest and smuggled them to India. From there, coffee spread across the world.

Ultimately, Sultan Murad IV banned coffee throughout the Ottoman Empire. In Europe, Charles II attempted to ban coffeehouses as hotbeds of dangerous political discussion. The effort failed.

Today, all government fears, maneuvers and schemes notwithstanding, the pleasures of coffee are enjoyed by happy consumers worldwide. Not only is it a satisfying beverage, but science tells us moderate amounts may provide beneficial health effects. Among other things, coffee may reduce the risk of prostate cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease, heart disease, dementia, cirrhosis and gout.

Just this week, a new report released by the National Institute of Environmental Health Science suggests coffee drinkers may even have reduced risk for developing depression.

So what might we conclude from all this? If nothing else, our default position on matters of government control should always be one of thoughtful suspicion. Whether it’s coffee, marijuana, sugary drinks or armed citizens, the question must always be — what is the ultimate cost of this control? Governments, by their nature, are insatiable. They never have enough power or large enough share of the resources. Governments never sleep and they never tire of probing the limits of people’s willingness to barter their rights or cough up their money. Governments are incredibly resourceful at disguising the insidious hook hidden within the shiny, dangling appeal of something “good for you.” “This goody’s yours. Don’t concern yourself with the long-term costs. You can pay later.”

Government’s track record on protecting us from our pleasures and peculiarities is grim. They may have given up on coffee, for now, but they’ll always be looking for some other control. For now, I think I’ll just enjoy my “cup o’ joe.” I’m Hink and I’ll see you ya.

MIKE HINKLE is an Edmond resident and retired attorney.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

  • Remembering lessons from 1974

    This week marks the 40th anniversary of an important milestone in America’s constitutional history. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to order the Nixon White House to turn over audiotapes that would prove the president and his close aides were guilty of criminal violations. This ruling established with crystal clarity that the executive branch could not hide behind the shield of executive privilege to protect itself from the consequences of illegal behavior. It was a triumph for the continued vitality of our constitutional form of government.

    July 25, 2014

  • RedBlueAmerica: Is parenting being criminalized in America?

    Debra Harrell was arrested recently after the McDonald’s employee let her daughter spend the day playing in a nearby park while she worked her shift. The South Carolina woman says her daughter had a cell phone in case of danger, and critics say that children once were given the independence to spend a few unsupervised hours in a park.
    Is it a crime to parent “free-range” kids? Does Harrell deserve her problems? Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuk, the RedBlueAmerica columnists, debate the issue.

    July 24, 2014

  • Technology that will stimulate journalism’s future is now here

    To say technology has changed the newspaper media industry is understating the obvious. While much discussion focuses on how we read the news, technology is changing the way we report the news. The image of a reporter showing up to a scene with a pen and a pad is iconic but lost to the vestiges of time.
    I am asked frequently about the future of newspapers and, in particular, what does a successful future look like. For journalists, to be successful is to command multiple technologies and share news with readers in new and exciting ways.

    July 23, 2014

  • New Orleans features its own “Running of the Bulls”

    On July12, the streets of the Warehouse District of New Orleans were filled with thousands of young men who were seeking to avoid being hit with plastic bats wielded by women on roller skates as part of the annual “Running of the Bulls” that takes place in New Orleans.
    The event is based on the “Running of the Bulls” that occurs in Pamplona, Spain, that is  part of an annual occurrence in which a group of bulls rampage through the streets of Pamplona while men run from them to avoid being gored by their sharp horns. That event was introduced to the English-speaking world by Ernest Hemingway, who included scenes from it in his critically acclaimed 1926 novel “The Sun also Rises.”

    July 22, 2014

  • OTHER VIEW: Newsday: Lapses on deadly diseases demand explanation

    When we heard that the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had created a potentially lethal safety risk by improperly sending deadly pathogens — like anthrax — to other laboratories around the country, our first reaction was disbelief.

    July 22, 2014

  • Holding government accountable for open meeting violations

    A few weeks ago I wrote about the recent success of three important government transparency proposals which will go into law this year.

    July 21, 2014

  • GUEST OPINION — Oklahoma GOP voters want educational choices

    A Braun Research survey released in January showed that Oklahoma voters — Republicans, Democrats, and Independents alike — favor parental choice in education.

    July 21, 2014

  • HEY HINK: IRS interferes with citizens’ rights of free speech

    The patient is gravely ill. We have detected traces of a deadly venom in the bloodstream. We don’t know how widespread the poison is, but we know, if not counteracted, toxins of this kind can rot the patient’s vital organs and could ultimately prove fatal.

    July 19, 2014

  • 130408_NT_BEA_good kids We're raising a generation of timid kids

    A week ago, a woman was charged with leaving her child in the car while she went into a store. Her 11-year-old child. This week, a woman was arrested for allowing her 9-year-old daughter to go to the park alone. Which raises just one question: America, what the heck is wrong with you?

    July 17, 2014 1 Photo

Poll

If the Republican runoff for the 5th District congressional seat were today, which candidate would you vote for?

Patrice Douglas
Steve Russell
Undecided
     View Results