The Edmond Sun


January 11, 2013

Who knew coffee was so revolutionary?

EDMOND — Let’s take a couple of minutes to talk about the relationship between coffee and misguided government. We’ll start with some general observations. First, for millions of us, coffee is among life’s great pleasures. One of the most satisfying activities a person can do — alone — is settle into a warm spot on a snowy day with a good book, some uplifting music and a hot cup of strong coffee.

What does this have to do with misguided government? Bear with me.

This is, admittedly, an oversimplification, but there are basically three types of government agenda operating in a democratic republic. First, one that’s good for the government and good for the people. Rigorous public education comes to mind. If the electorate is well grounded in the pitfalls of history and the mechanics of civil participation, that electorate is more likely to make wise choices leading to competent, responsible governance.

Next, an agenda may be good for the people and problematic for the government. Protection of free speech is an example. All governments make mistakes. All governments get heartburn when these mistakes are pointed out and freely discussed by an electorate having the power to change the government.

Then, there are agendas that are bad for the government and the people. Take Prohibition for example. This boondoggle unleashed a criminal scourge and promoted the growth of pseudo-governments operated by ruthless gangsters that, in some ways, exercised more power over people than federal, state and local authorities.

Now, about that coffee. When coffee first came to the attention of the authorities in Yemen, it was welcomed as a miracle drug. Sheik Omar, who gets credit for discovering coffee roasting and brewing, was granted sainthood by those grateful authorities. The government said “Coffee is good.”

In time, Yemeni authorities realized coffee’s potential commercial value. Desiring to create and maintain a “miracle drug” monopoly, they outlawed the export of any coffee seeds capable of producing live plants. The government said “The coffee trade must be controlled.”

In the early 1500s, coffee houses appeared in Mecca. As coffee promoted animated conversation and this conversation often turned to politics, the imams of Mecca grew fearful of these gatherings and banned coffee in 1511. The government said “Coffee drinkers are troublemakers and must be silenced.”

As coffee drinking spread into the Christian world, nervous clerics banned coffee because it was “a Muslim drink.” The government said “Coffee is unchristian and must be forbidden.”

Later, in 1600, over sharp objection from devout clergyman, Pope Clement VIII declared that coffee was, in fact, a Christian beverage. The government said “Coffee is redeemed. It is no longer heathen, so it’s OK.” Even so, Ethiopian Orthodox Christians prohibited coffee as a “Muslim drink” as late as 1889.

In 1670, Yemen still prohibited the export of coffee seeds. According to legend, Sufi Baba Budam strapped seven live coffee seeds to his chest and smuggled them to India. From there, coffee spread across the world.

Ultimately, Sultan Murad IV banned coffee throughout the Ottoman Empire. In Europe, Charles II attempted to ban coffeehouses as hotbeds of dangerous political discussion. The effort failed.

Today, all government fears, maneuvers and schemes notwithstanding, the pleasures of coffee are enjoyed by happy consumers worldwide. Not only is it a satisfying beverage, but science tells us moderate amounts may provide beneficial health effects. Among other things, coffee may reduce the risk of prostate cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease, heart disease, dementia, cirrhosis and gout.

Just this week, a new report released by the National Institute of Environmental Health Science suggests coffee drinkers may even have reduced risk for developing depression.

So what might we conclude from all this? If nothing else, our default position on matters of government control should always be one of thoughtful suspicion. Whether it’s coffee, marijuana, sugary drinks or armed citizens, the question must always be — what is the ultimate cost of this control? Governments, by their nature, are insatiable. They never have enough power or large enough share of the resources. Governments never sleep and they never tire of probing the limits of people’s willingness to barter their rights or cough up their money. Governments are incredibly resourceful at disguising the insidious hook hidden within the shiny, dangling appeal of something “good for you.” “This goody’s yours. Don’t concern yourself with the long-term costs. You can pay later.”

Government’s track record on protecting us from our pleasures and peculiarities is grim. They may have given up on coffee, for now, but they’ll always be looking for some other control. For now, I think I’ll just enjoy my “cup o’ joe.” I’m Hink and I’ll see you ya.

MIKE HINKLE is an Edmond resident and retired attorney.

Text Only
  • 'Too big to fail' equals 'too eager to borrow'

    Four years ago this month, President Barack Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law, promising that the 848-page financial law would “put a stop to taxpayer bailouts once and for all,” he said. But recently, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren told a Detroit crowd that “the biggest banks are even bigger than they were when they got too big to fail in 2008.”
    Who’s right?

    July 30, 2014

  • Sheltons travel for better life for family

    Some time around 1865 a mixed-race African American couple, William and Mary Shelton, made their way from Mississippi to east Texas. Nothing is known for certain of their origins in he Magnolia state, or the circumstances under which they began their new lives in Texas.

    July 29, 2014

  • Film critic Turan produces book

    Kenneth Turan, who is the film critic for National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition,” has written a book “Not to be Missed, Fifty-Four Favorites from a Life Time of Film.” His list of movies span the gamut from the beginnings of filmmaking through the present day.
    There are some surprising omissions on his list. While he includes two films, “A Touch of Evil” and Chimes at Midnight” made by Orson Welles, and one, “The Third Man,” that Welles starred in but did not direct. He did not however, include “Citizen Kane,” that was the first movie Welles made, that is  often cited by both film critics and historians as a favorite film.

    July 28, 2014

  • Logan County’s disputed zone

    Watchers of “Star Trek” may recall the episode from the original series entitled, “Day of the Dove.” In this episode, Captain Kirk and his crew are forced by a series of circumstances into a confrontation with the Klingons. The conflict eventually resolves after Kirk realizes that the circumstances have been intentionally designed by an alien force which feeds off negative emotions, especially fear and anger. Kirk and his crew communicate this fact to the Klingons and the conflict subsides. No longer feeding upon confrontation, the alien force is weakened and successfully driven away.

    July 28, 2014

  • Russell leads in Sun poll

    Polling results of an unscientific poll at show that Steve Russell, GOP candidate for the 5th District congressional seat, is in the lead with 57 percent of the vote ahead of the Aug. 26 runoff election. Thirty readers participated in the online poll.

    July 28, 2014

  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

  • Remembering lessons from 1974

    This week marks the 40th anniversary of an important milestone in America’s constitutional history. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to order the Nixon White House to turn over audiotapes that would prove the president and his close aides were guilty of criminal violations. This ruling established with crystal clarity that the executive branch could not hide behind the shield of executive privilege to protect itself from the consequences of illegal behavior. It was a triumph for the continued vitality of our constitutional form of government.

    July 25, 2014

  • RedBlueAmerica: Is parenting being criminalized in America?

    Debra Harrell was arrested recently after the McDonald’s employee let her daughter spend the day playing in a nearby park while she worked her shift. The South Carolina woman says her daughter had a cell phone in case of danger, and critics say that children once were given the independence to spend a few unsupervised hours in a park.
    Is it a crime to parent “free-range” kids? Does Harrell deserve her problems? Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuk, the RedBlueAmerica columnists, debate the issue.

    July 24, 2014

  • Technology that will stimulate journalism’s future is now here

    To say technology has changed the newspaper media industry is understating the obvious. While much discussion focuses on how we read the news, technology is changing the way we report the news. The image of a reporter showing up to a scene with a pen and a pad is iconic but lost to the vestiges of time.
    I am asked frequently about the future of newspapers and, in particular, what does a successful future look like. For journalists, to be successful is to command multiple technologies and share news with readers in new and exciting ways.

    July 23, 2014


The runoff race for the 5th District congressional seat is set for Aug. 26. If the voting were today, which candidate would you support?

Al McAffrey
Tom Guild
     View Results