The Edmond Sun


June 21, 2014

How gullible are we this week? (Hey Hink 6-21)

EDMOND — Let’s do something for the IRS they practically never do for us. Let’s give them the benefit of the doubt. Let’s assume when they announced last Friday that Lois Lerner’s computer crashed in 2011, that’s what happened. We all remember Ms. Lerner. She was head of the IRS “Exempt Organizations Division” during the time the IRS was illegally impeding efforts by certain organizations to receive tax exempt status. We recall when she was called to testify concerning her conduct during that time she refused to answer questions because her testimony might tend to incriminate her.

Let’s assume the alleged 2011 computer crash destroyed any potentially incriminating emails that might shed light on Lerner’s culpability as well as any culpability of possible co-conspirators.

Let’s assume, further, that the IRS is telling the truth when they say that all the king’s horses and all the king’s men can do nothing to recover the data that was on Lerner’s hard drive.

Now, let’s cut them some more slack. Let’s assume the IRS is plagued by an unbelievably embarrassing and inconvenient series of coincidences. When they announced earlier this week that the computer crash wiped out not only Lerner’s emails, but the emails of another six IRS employees, let’s assume it’s nothing more than a case of incredibly bad luck.

Let’s assume the IRS had a really good reason for withholding from Inspector General and congressional investigators the details of this “oh-so-inconvenient” computer crash until this very moment. Let’s assume there’s nothing willfully underhanded about the timing of these announcements. Let’s give the IRS the benefit of any doubt and assume they are as interested in getting to the truth is we are.

But let’s not stop there. As long as we’re at it, let’s accept the president’s statements about the situation at face value. Let’s assume he learned about the IRS abuses when the facts broke in the public media. This requires us to believe that his closest advisers were also in the dark or that they knew what was about to break and decided, for whatever reason, to keep these important facts from the boss.

Let’s assume when the president said he was “outraged,” that he really was. Let’s assume when he told the American public he intended to get to the bottom of things, he really meant to. Earlier this year, when he said there wasn’t a “smidgen” of corruption associated with the “targeting scandal” let’s assume he believed that.

Now let’s assume he knows, like the rest of us, about this computer crash and these lost emails. Let’s assume he has intelligence and judgment enough to know how suspicious this looks. Let’s assume he’s a principled man who is determined to keep his promise to “get to the bottom” of this, find out who’s responsible and hold them accountable. Let’s assume these are not empty words delivered for purely cosmetic purposes.

Now let’s assume our president is a capable problem solver. Let’s assume his conscience forces him to spend some time figuring out how to reassure the American public that there’s no cover-up going on; no sinister conspiracy to conceal evidence; no intent to deceive the American public with a “cock-and-bull” story about mysterious computer crashes. Let’s assume he’s not counting on the public to be intentionally gullible because they really want to believe their president — this time.

If all these assumptions are true, the IRS is innocent but plagued by bad luck; the president is honest and capable and committed to keeping his word. What would be the president’s next step? He knows Lerner’s emails were transmitted to other members of the executive branch. He knows the most potentially damning emails are those that might have been transmitted to the FBI, the FEC, other IRS branches, employees of the Justice Department and representatives of the White House.

A capable, principled president would issue a blanket order directing any federal employee in any of these agencies who sent or received emails from Lois Lerner or any other IRS operatives whose computers crashed to immediately notify Congress about the existence of those emails and start the wheels in motion to reconstruct those missing messages. Surely there’s sufficient power in the office of the president to accomplish this task — assuming the president really wants it accomplished.

Unless we’re lulled, once again, into a state of passive apathy, we’ll know, very soon, whether we are justified in extending the benefit of the doubt to the IRS and the president. Or we’ll know whether we are, once again, being taken for a population of fools. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

Text Only
  • 'Too big to fail' equals 'too eager to borrow'

    Four years ago this month, President Barack Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law, promising that the 848-page financial law would “put a stop to taxpayer bailouts once and for all,” he said. But recently, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren told a Detroit crowd that “the biggest banks are even bigger than they were when they got too big to fail in 2008.”
    Who’s right?

    July 30, 2014

  • Sheltons travel for better life for family

    Some time around 1865 a mixed-race African American couple, William and Mary Shelton, made their way from Mississippi to east Texas. Nothing is known for certain of their origins in he Magnolia state, or the circumstances under which they began their new lives in Texas.

    July 29, 2014

  • Film critic Turan produces book

    Kenneth Turan, who is the film critic for National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition,” has written a book “Not to be Missed, Fifty-Four Favorites from a Life Time of Film.” His list of movies span the gamut from the beginnings of filmmaking through the present day.
    There are some surprising omissions on his list. While he includes two films, “A Touch of Evil” and Chimes at Midnight” made by Orson Welles, and one, “The Third Man,” that Welles starred in but did not direct. He did not however, include “Citizen Kane,” that was the first movie Welles made, that is  often cited by both film critics and historians as a favorite film.

    July 28, 2014

  • Logan County’s disputed zone

    Watchers of “Star Trek” may recall the episode from the original series entitled, “Day of the Dove.” In this episode, Captain Kirk and his crew are forced by a series of circumstances into a confrontation with the Klingons. The conflict eventually resolves after Kirk realizes that the circumstances have been intentionally designed by an alien force which feeds off negative emotions, especially fear and anger. Kirk and his crew communicate this fact to the Klingons and the conflict subsides. No longer feeding upon confrontation, the alien force is weakened and successfully driven away.

    July 28, 2014

  • Russell leads in Sun poll

    Polling results of an unscientific poll at show that Steve Russell, GOP candidate for the 5th District congressional seat, is in the lead with 57 percent of the vote ahead of the Aug. 26 runoff election. Thirty readers participated in the online poll.

    July 28, 2014

  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

  • Remembering lessons from 1974

    This week marks the 40th anniversary of an important milestone in America’s constitutional history. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to order the Nixon White House to turn over audiotapes that would prove the president and his close aides were guilty of criminal violations. This ruling established with crystal clarity that the executive branch could not hide behind the shield of executive privilege to protect itself from the consequences of illegal behavior. It was a triumph for the continued vitality of our constitutional form of government.

    July 25, 2014

  • RedBlueAmerica: Is parenting being criminalized in America?

    Debra Harrell was arrested recently after the McDonald’s employee let her daughter spend the day playing in a nearby park while she worked her shift. The South Carolina woman says her daughter had a cell phone in case of danger, and critics say that children once were given the independence to spend a few unsupervised hours in a park.
    Is it a crime to parent “free-range” kids? Does Harrell deserve her problems? Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuk, the RedBlueAmerica columnists, debate the issue.

    July 24, 2014

  • Technology that will stimulate journalism’s future is now here

    To say technology has changed the newspaper media industry is understating the obvious. While much discussion focuses on how we read the news, technology is changing the way we report the news. The image of a reporter showing up to a scene with a pen and a pad is iconic but lost to the vestiges of time.
    I am asked frequently about the future of newspapers and, in particular, what does a successful future look like. For journalists, to be successful is to command multiple technologies and share news with readers in new and exciting ways.

    July 23, 2014


The runoff race for the 5th District congressional seat is set for Aug. 26. If the voting were today, which candidate would you support?

Al McAffrey
Tom Guild
     View Results