The Edmond Sun

Opinion

January 17, 2014

HEY HINK: Gullible taxpayers are forgetting misdeeds too soon

EDMOND — Some people must think there are no limits to American taxpayer gullibility. This week, the Wall Street Journal reports the Justice Department, prior to concluding its investigation, is signaling that no criminal charges will be filed in the IRS “political targeting” scandal. Unfortunately, the average American taxpayer is not equipped to know whether some ill-intentioned individual or some sinister group within the IRS unlawfully used the power of the agency to inhibit the political freedoms of law-abiding citizens. In the absence of all the facts, citizens have no choice but to rely on their common sense.

It may be, as the Wall Street Journal reports, the FBI investigation “did not uncover (note the choice of words here) the type of political bias or enemy hunting that could constitute a criminal violation. The evidence showed a mismanaged agency enforcing rules it did not understand on applications for tax exemptions.”

It may be the sanctity of America’s political freedoms was bloodied and bruised by the malfeasance of a bunch of clumsy, oafish, mismanaged, ignorant bureaucrats who trampled on the peoples’ fundamental rights by pure, “boy-am-I-red-faced” accident. The fact the tax exempt applications of mostly conservative groups received special restrictive review in the run-up to the 2012 elections may be an “oh-golly-gee” coincidence.

Likewise, the naming of Barbara Bosserman, a known supporter of Barack Obama’s presidential campaign, as the administration’s choice to head the Department of Justice investigation into the scandal may be on the up-and-up with no hint of partisan motivation. Some might insist that Bosserrman’s appointment, innocent or not, raises the specter of bias and creates the appearance of impropriety. In response, the Justice Department spokesperson pleads impotence. Inability to consider political activities in deciding who should head a politically charged investigation apparently trumps “appearance of impropriety” issues. As for any suspicions concerning Bosserman’s ability and/or willingness to be impartial — well, taxpayers will just have to “lump it.”

Taxpayers may not know, for certain, whether a crime was committed. But here’s what they do know. Something went dangerously haywire in the IRS. The Treasury Department Inspector General found that the IRS targeted civilian groups based on names and political themes.

If the applicant’s “case file” contained terms like “patriot,” “tea party,” “Israel,” “progressive”; or if the application referred to “government spending,” “government debt,” or “taxes”; if the purpose of the group was to advocate education concerning the Constitution or Bill of Rights; if the group proposed to challenge Obamacare or question the integrity of federal elections; if any of these conditions appeared in the applicant’s paperwork, that paperwork was flagged to run an additional gauntlet of red tape. This red tape noose around the throats of these groups effectively silenced them in the run-up to the 2012 election.

According to the Inspector General, 292 conservative groups came under IRS attention while, during the same period, only six liberal groups received that review. This constitutes 100 percent of the conservative applicants and 30 percent of the liberal groups applying for tax-exempt status. The numbers do not lie. So how are taxpayers expected to process the statistics? No matter what their common sense tells them, the FBI seems poised to dismiss the possibility of unlawful political bias or enemy hunting. The Department of Justice seems totally unafraid that the gullibility of the American taxpayer may be reaching its limit.

The docile American taxpayer seems content to forget that the administration erected a protective barrier between the public and the truth regarding those responsible for the “fast and furious” program, which provided weapons to drug-dealing assassins and contributed to the death of federal agent Brian Terry.

Taxpayer fury concerning the gross mishandling of security in Benghazi and the lies told in the aftermath of the murder of four brave Americans seems to be tapering off. To date, a veil of secrecy remains in place concerning what actually happened that night and who was responsible. There is no aggressive widespread outcry to lift that veil.

Taxpayer outrage over government spying on respected journalists never gathered much momentum. The Attorney General may have committed perjury regarding his knowledge of these activities but that’s all quieted down.

This seems to be the main administration strategy for dealing with taxpayer outrage: Say whatever is expedient in a crisis without regard to the truth. Vow to “get to the bottom of it” and hold those responsible, “accountable.” Weather the storm. Shield the culprits. Keep up the dodge until the dust settles. The taxpayers won’t stay mad long and they’ll believe almost anything. Ultimately, they’ll mistrust their own common sense. I wonder if they’re right. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

 

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Is English getting dissed?

    Is the English language being massacred by the young, the linguistically untidy and anyone who uses the Internet? Absolutely.
    Is that anything new? Hardly.
    Many words and expressions in common parlance today would have raised the hackles of language scolds in the not-so-distant past. For evidence, let’s look at some examples from recent newspaper articles.

    July 31, 2014

  • 'Too big to fail' equals 'too eager to borrow'

    Four years ago this month, President Barack Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law, promising that the 848-page financial law would “put a stop to taxpayer bailouts once and for all,” he said. But recently, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren told a Detroit crowd that “the biggest banks are even bigger than they were when they got too big to fail in 2008.”
    Who’s right?

    July 30, 2014

  • Sheltons travel for better life for family

    Some time around 1865 a mixed-race African American couple, William and Mary Shelton, made their way from Mississippi to east Texas. Nothing is known for certain of their origins in he Magnolia state, or the circumstances under which they began their new lives in Texas.

    July 29, 2014

  • Film critic Turan produces book

    Kenneth Turan, who is the film critic for National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition,” has written a book “Not to be Missed, Fifty-Four Favorites from a Life Time of Film.” His list of movies span the gamut from the beginnings of filmmaking through the present day.
    There are some surprising omissions on his list. While he includes two films, “A Touch of Evil” and Chimes at Midnight” made by Orson Welles, and one, “The Third Man,” that Welles starred in but did not direct. He did not however, include “Citizen Kane,” that was the first movie Welles made, that is  often cited by both film critics and historians as a favorite film.

    July 28, 2014

  • Logan County’s disputed zone

    Watchers of “Star Trek” may recall the episode from the original series entitled, “Day of the Dove.” In this episode, Captain Kirk and his crew are forced by a series of circumstances into a confrontation with the Klingons. The conflict eventually resolves after Kirk realizes that the circumstances have been intentionally designed by an alien force which feeds off negative emotions, especially fear and anger. Kirk and his crew communicate this fact to the Klingons and the conflict subsides. No longer feeding upon confrontation, the alien force is weakened and successfully driven away.

    July 28, 2014

  • Russell leads in Sun poll

    Polling results of an unscientific poll at www.edmondsun.com show that Steve Russell, GOP candidate for the 5th District congressional seat, is in the lead with 57 percent of the vote ahead of the Aug. 26 runoff election. Thirty readers participated in the online poll.

    July 28, 2014

  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

  • Remembering lessons from 1974

    This week marks the 40th anniversary of an important milestone in America’s constitutional history. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to order the Nixon White House to turn over audiotapes that would prove the president and his close aides were guilty of criminal violations. This ruling established with crystal clarity that the executive branch could not hide behind the shield of executive privilege to protect itself from the consequences of illegal behavior. It was a triumph for the continued vitality of our constitutional form of government.

    July 25, 2014

  • RedBlueAmerica: Is parenting being criminalized in America?

    Debra Harrell was arrested recently after the McDonald’s employee let her daughter spend the day playing in a nearby park while she worked her shift. The South Carolina woman says her daughter had a cell phone in case of danger, and critics say that children once were given the independence to spend a few unsupervised hours in a park.
    Is it a crime to parent “free-range” kids? Does Harrell deserve her problems? Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuk, the RedBlueAmerica columnists, debate the issue.

    July 24, 2014

Poll

The runoff race for the 5th District congressional seat is set for Aug. 26. If the voting were today, which candidate would you support?

Al McAffrey
Tom Guild
Undecided
     View Results