The Edmond Sun


January 17, 2014

HEY HINK: Gullible taxpayers are forgetting misdeeds too soon

EDMOND — Some people must think there are no limits to American taxpayer gullibility. This week, the Wall Street Journal reports the Justice Department, prior to concluding its investigation, is signaling that no criminal charges will be filed in the IRS “political targeting” scandal. Unfortunately, the average American taxpayer is not equipped to know whether some ill-intentioned individual or some sinister group within the IRS unlawfully used the power of the agency to inhibit the political freedoms of law-abiding citizens. In the absence of all the facts, citizens have no choice but to rely on their common sense.

It may be, as the Wall Street Journal reports, the FBI investigation “did not uncover (note the choice of words here) the type of political bias or enemy hunting that could constitute a criminal violation. The evidence showed a mismanaged agency enforcing rules it did not understand on applications for tax exemptions.”

It may be the sanctity of America’s political freedoms was bloodied and bruised by the malfeasance of a bunch of clumsy, oafish, mismanaged, ignorant bureaucrats who trampled on the peoples’ fundamental rights by pure, “boy-am-I-red-faced” accident. The fact the tax exempt applications of mostly conservative groups received special restrictive review in the run-up to the 2012 elections may be an “oh-golly-gee” coincidence.

Likewise, the naming of Barbara Bosserman, a known supporter of Barack Obama’s presidential campaign, as the administration’s choice to head the Department of Justice investigation into the scandal may be on the up-and-up with no hint of partisan motivation. Some might insist that Bosserrman’s appointment, innocent or not, raises the specter of bias and creates the appearance of impropriety. In response, the Justice Department spokesperson pleads impotence. Inability to consider political activities in deciding who should head a politically charged investigation apparently trumps “appearance of impropriety” issues. As for any suspicions concerning Bosserman’s ability and/or willingness to be impartial — well, taxpayers will just have to “lump it.”

Taxpayers may not know, for certain, whether a crime was committed. But here’s what they do know. Something went dangerously haywire in the IRS. The Treasury Department Inspector General found that the IRS targeted civilian groups based on names and political themes.

If the applicant’s “case file” contained terms like “patriot,” “tea party,” “Israel,” “progressive”; or if the application referred to “government spending,” “government debt,” or “taxes”; if the purpose of the group was to advocate education concerning the Constitution or Bill of Rights; if the group proposed to challenge Obamacare or question the integrity of federal elections; if any of these conditions appeared in the applicant’s paperwork, that paperwork was flagged to run an additional gauntlet of red tape. This red tape noose around the throats of these groups effectively silenced them in the run-up to the 2012 election.

According to the Inspector General, 292 conservative groups came under IRS attention while, during the same period, only six liberal groups received that review. This constitutes 100 percent of the conservative applicants and 30 percent of the liberal groups applying for tax-exempt status. The numbers do not lie. So how are taxpayers expected to process the statistics? No matter what their common sense tells them, the FBI seems poised to dismiss the possibility of unlawful political bias or enemy hunting. The Department of Justice seems totally unafraid that the gullibility of the American taxpayer may be reaching its limit.

The docile American taxpayer seems content to forget that the administration erected a protective barrier between the public and the truth regarding those responsible for the “fast and furious” program, which provided weapons to drug-dealing assassins and contributed to the death of federal agent Brian Terry.

Taxpayer fury concerning the gross mishandling of security in Benghazi and the lies told in the aftermath of the murder of four brave Americans seems to be tapering off. To date, a veil of secrecy remains in place concerning what actually happened that night and who was responsible. There is no aggressive widespread outcry to lift that veil.

Taxpayer outrage over government spying on respected journalists never gathered much momentum. The Attorney General may have committed perjury regarding his knowledge of these activities but that’s all quieted down.

This seems to be the main administration strategy for dealing with taxpayer outrage: Say whatever is expedient in a crisis without regard to the truth. Vow to “get to the bottom of it” and hold those responsible, “accountable.” Weather the storm. Shield the culprits. Keep up the dodge until the dust settles. The taxpayers won’t stay mad long and they’ll believe almost anything. Ultimately, they’ll mistrust their own common sense. I wonder if they’re right. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.


Text Only
  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

  • Los Angeles Times: Congress extend jobless benefits again

    How’s this for irony: Having allowed federal unemployment benefits to run out in December, some lawmakers are balking at a bill to renew them retroactively because it might be hard to figure out who should receive them. Congress made this task far harder than it should have been, but the technical challenges aren’t insurmountable. Lawmakers should restore the benefits now and leave them in place until the unemployment rate reaches a more reasonable level.

    April 14, 2014

  • Many nations invested in Israel

    Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yoram Ettinger recently spoke to a gathering at the Chabad Center for Jewish Life and Learning in Oklahoma City. The event began with a presentation by Rabbi Ovadia Goldman, who told the attendee that the  upcoming Jewish holiday of Passover was an occasion for them to embrace the children of God, which is all of humanity.

    April 14, 2014

  • Coming soon: More ways to get to know your doctor

    Last week, the federal government released a massive database capable of providing patients with much more information about their doctors.
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government agency that runs Medicare, is posting on its website detailed information about how many visits and procedures individual health professionals billed the program for in 2012, and how much they were paid.
    This new trove of data, which covers 880,000 health professionals, adds to a growing body of information available to patients who don’t want to leave choosing a doctor to chance. But to put that information to good use, consumers need to be aware of what is available, what’s missing and how to interpret it.

    April 14, 2014

  • HEY HINK: Hateful bullies attempt to muffle free speech

    Hopefully we agree it should be a fundamental right to voice criticism of any religion you wish. And you should have the right to sing the praises of any religion you choose. If criticism of religion is unjust, feel free to make your best argument to prove it. If criticism is just, don’t be afraid to acknowledge and embrace it. If songs of praise are merited, feel free to join in. If not, feel free to ignore them. But no American should participate in curbing free speech just because expression of religious views makes someone uncomfortable.

    April 11, 2014

  • Putting Oklahoma parents in charge

    Oklahoma’s public schools serve many children very well. Still, for various reasons, some students’ needs are better met in private schools, in virtual schools or elsewhere. That is why two state lawmakers have introduced legislation to give parents debit cards, literally, to shop for the educational services that work best for their children.

    April 11, 2014

  • Israelis, Palestinians are losing their chance

    Developments in the Middle East suggest that prospects of success for the Israeli-Palestinian talks, to which Secretary of State John Kerry has devoted countless hours and trips, are weakening.

    April 11, 2014

  • Teens might trade naked selfies for mugshots

    Will teenagers ever learn? You think yours will. Maybe so. But it's likely that was also the hope of the parents of children who were so shamed by nude photos of themselves that went south - how else can they go - that they killed themselves.

    April 11, 2014

  • Tax deadline and no reform in sight

    The annual tax filing deadline, which comes next Tuesday, provides a good opportunity for tax reform advocates to decry the current law’s increasing complexity and inequities, and to urge enactment of a simpler, fairer system.

    April 10, 2014

  • To get quality care, it helps to be the right kind of patient

    I am a family physician. Sometimes I must step out of the comfort of my clinical role and into that of patient or family caregiver. Generally, these trips to the other side of the exam table inspire a fair amount of anxiety.

    April 8, 2014


Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

     View Results