The Edmond Sun


July 26, 2013

Women’s high-dollar products used as deterrents

EDMOND — This week, science makes a stunning disclosure about the hidden meaning of women’s handbags. As men have long suspected, there’s a much deeper, perhaps sinister message conveyed by a woman’s choice of this portable accessory. After all, Americans spend more than $250 billion (that’s right — billion) on women’s luxury products each year. The average woman adds three new handbags to her wardrobe annually.

The obvious explanations are plausible but not altogether satisfying. Sure, an expensive handbag may serve as an easy-to-see proclamation about a woman’s social status. A nice handbag may be confirmation the owner has a good sense of style. No doubt, a nice new handbag may provide a boost to a woman’s self-esteem.

But as surely as dog whistles communicate on an auditory level beyond the ear of man, a woman’s handbag sends a message not accessible to us guys.

Researchers at the University of Minnesota conducted a number of experiments involving 649 women of varying ages, social standing and relationship status. The purpose of this research was to discover (if possible) the existential meaning behind a woman’s choice of her handbag. The results are shocking. According to Associate Professor Vladas Griskevicius, “Conspicuous consumption is actually smart for women who want to protect their relationship. When a woman is flaunting designer products, it says to other women ‘back off my man.’” In other words, the seemingly irrational craving for luxury goods is, in reality, motivated by the owner’s desire to protect her relationship.

This only works, of course, if potential rivals get the message. PhD student Yajin Wang, who participated in the study, suggests this is precisely the case. “We found that a woman who is wearing luxury items and designer brands is perceived to have a more devoted partner and as a result other women are less likely to flirt with him.

Regardless of who actually purchased the items, other women inferred that the man had something to do with it and is thus more devoted to her.”

At this point, the logical mind naturally generates a question: What about women who are “unattached?” They seem as eager to possess designer goods as married ladies. Isn’t this a flaw in the theory? As it turns out — no. “Many single women obviously want designer products. But instead of those products saying back off my current man, the single woman is saying back off my future man,” according to Wang. At this point, the logical mind naturally generates another question: How do potential rivals arrive at the conclusion that an unattached lady, because she has luxury goods today, will someday have a man who would have bought those goods if he was around and, oh yeah, he’ll be impervious to flirtation when he finally does show up?

These are complicated questions which will, no doubt, be answered by future scientific studies.

Even so, the surprising conclusions can be backed up with experimental findings. In one study, Griskevicius and Wang triggered jealous impulses in their subjects by prompting them to imagine another woman flirting with “their man.” Thereafter, the women were asked to draw luxury brand logos on handbags. Predictably, those women who felt jealous drew designer logos twice the size of those drawn in other conditions. Obviously, jealousy heightens a woman’s craving for luxury goods. The meaning is inescapable — right? In Wang’s words, “The feeling that a relationship is being threatened by another woman automatically triggers women to want to flash Gucci, Chanel and Fendi to other women. A designer handbag or pair of expensive shoes seems to work like a shield, where wielding a Fendi handbag successfully fends off romantic rivals.”


In another experiment, Griskevicius and Wang found when romantic relationships are threatened, women not only desire more expensive handbags, cars, cell phones and shoes, they also spend 32 percent more of their own money for a chance to win a luxury spending spree.

Once again, the logical mind generates a question: If women crave luxury goods as a means of protecting their relationships, what accounts for men who are equally drawn to expensive cars, cell phones etc.?

Though the article doesn’t furnish scientific backup, the researchers suggest rather than preserving a relationship, men display expensive products to attract the opposite sex.

So what does this mean in practical terms? Men should be flattered when their wives and girlfriends load up on luxury items. They’re really saying to the world, “My man buys me expensive stuff and he’s devoted. So you other gals keep your hands off.” I don’t know about you, my brothers, but I don’t feel that much better about it. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.


MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney

and Edmond resident.

Text Only
  • 'Too big to fail' equals 'too eager to borrow'

    Four years ago this month, President Barack Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law, promising that the 848-page financial law would “put a stop to taxpayer bailouts once and for all,” he said. But recently, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren told a Detroit crowd that “the biggest banks are even bigger than they were when they got too big to fail in 2008.”
    Who’s right?

    July 30, 2014

  • Sheltons travel for better life for family

    Some time around 1865 a mixed-race African American couple, William and Mary Shelton, made their way from Mississippi to east Texas. Nothing is known for certain of their origins in he Magnolia state, or the circumstances under which they began their new lives in Texas.

    July 29, 2014

  • Film critic Turan produces book

    Kenneth Turan, who is the film critic for National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition,” has written a book “Not to be Missed, Fifty-Four Favorites from a Life Time of Film.” His list of movies span the gamut from the beginnings of filmmaking through the present day.
    There are some surprising omissions on his list. While he includes two films, “A Touch of Evil” and Chimes at Midnight” made by Orson Welles, and one, “The Third Man,” that Welles starred in but did not direct. He did not however, include “Citizen Kane,” that was the first movie Welles made, that is  often cited by both film critics and historians as a favorite film.

    July 28, 2014

  • Logan County’s disputed zone

    Watchers of “Star Trek” may recall the episode from the original series entitled, “Day of the Dove.” In this episode, Captain Kirk and his crew are forced by a series of circumstances into a confrontation with the Klingons. The conflict eventually resolves after Kirk realizes that the circumstances have been intentionally designed by an alien force which feeds off negative emotions, especially fear and anger. Kirk and his crew communicate this fact to the Klingons and the conflict subsides. No longer feeding upon confrontation, the alien force is weakened and successfully driven away.

    July 28, 2014

  • Russell leads in Sun poll

    Polling results of an unscientific poll at show that Steve Russell, GOP candidate for the 5th District congressional seat, is in the lead with 57 percent of the vote ahead of the Aug. 26 runoff election. Thirty readers participated in the online poll.

    July 28, 2014

  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

  • Remembering lessons from 1974

    This week marks the 40th anniversary of an important milestone in America’s constitutional history. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to order the Nixon White House to turn over audiotapes that would prove the president and his close aides were guilty of criminal violations. This ruling established with crystal clarity that the executive branch could not hide behind the shield of executive privilege to protect itself from the consequences of illegal behavior. It was a triumph for the continued vitality of our constitutional form of government.

    July 25, 2014

  • RedBlueAmerica: Is parenting being criminalized in America?

    Debra Harrell was arrested recently after the McDonald’s employee let her daughter spend the day playing in a nearby park while she worked her shift. The South Carolina woman says her daughter had a cell phone in case of danger, and critics say that children once were given the independence to spend a few unsupervised hours in a park.
    Is it a crime to parent “free-range” kids? Does Harrell deserve her problems? Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuk, the RedBlueAmerica columnists, debate the issue.

    July 24, 2014

  • Technology that will stimulate journalism’s future is now here

    To say technology has changed the newspaper media industry is understating the obvious. While much discussion focuses on how we read the news, technology is changing the way we report the news. The image of a reporter showing up to a scene with a pen and a pad is iconic but lost to the vestiges of time.
    I am asked frequently about the future of newspapers and, in particular, what does a successful future look like. For journalists, to be successful is to command multiple technologies and share news with readers in new and exciting ways.

    July 23, 2014


The runoff race for the 5th District congressional seat is set for Aug. 26. If the voting were today, which candidate would you support?

Al McAffrey
Tom Guild
     View Results