The Edmond Sun


July 26, 2013

Women’s high-dollar products used as deterrents

EDMOND — This week, science makes a stunning disclosure about the hidden meaning of women’s handbags. As men have long suspected, there’s a much deeper, perhaps sinister message conveyed by a woman’s choice of this portable accessory. After all, Americans spend more than $250 billion (that’s right — billion) on women’s luxury products each year. The average woman adds three new handbags to her wardrobe annually.

The obvious explanations are plausible but not altogether satisfying. Sure, an expensive handbag may serve as an easy-to-see proclamation about a woman’s social status. A nice handbag may be confirmation the owner has a good sense of style. No doubt, a nice new handbag may provide a boost to a woman’s self-esteem.

But as surely as dog whistles communicate on an auditory level beyond the ear of man, a woman’s handbag sends a message not accessible to us guys.

Researchers at the University of Minnesota conducted a number of experiments involving 649 women of varying ages, social standing and relationship status. The purpose of this research was to discover (if possible) the existential meaning behind a woman’s choice of her handbag. The results are shocking. According to Associate Professor Vladas Griskevicius, “Conspicuous consumption is actually smart for women who want to protect their relationship. When a woman is flaunting designer products, it says to other women ‘back off my man.’” In other words, the seemingly irrational craving for luxury goods is, in reality, motivated by the owner’s desire to protect her relationship.

This only works, of course, if potential rivals get the message. PhD student Yajin Wang, who participated in the study, suggests this is precisely the case. “We found that a woman who is wearing luxury items and designer brands is perceived to have a more devoted partner and as a result other women are less likely to flirt with him.

Regardless of who actually purchased the items, other women inferred that the man had something to do with it and is thus more devoted to her.”

At this point, the logical mind naturally generates a question: What about women who are “unattached?” They seem as eager to possess designer goods as married ladies. Isn’t this a flaw in the theory? As it turns out — no. “Many single women obviously want designer products. But instead of those products saying back off my current man, the single woman is saying back off my future man,” according to Wang. At this point, the logical mind naturally generates another question: How do potential rivals arrive at the conclusion that an unattached lady, because she has luxury goods today, will someday have a man who would have bought those goods if he was around and, oh yeah, he’ll be impervious to flirtation when he finally does show up?

These are complicated questions which will, no doubt, be answered by future scientific studies.

Even so, the surprising conclusions can be backed up with experimental findings. In one study, Griskevicius and Wang triggered jealous impulses in their subjects by prompting them to imagine another woman flirting with “their man.” Thereafter, the women were asked to draw luxury brand logos on handbags. Predictably, those women who felt jealous drew designer logos twice the size of those drawn in other conditions. Obviously, jealousy heightens a woman’s craving for luxury goods. The meaning is inescapable — right? In Wang’s words, “The feeling that a relationship is being threatened by another woman automatically triggers women to want to flash Gucci, Chanel and Fendi to other women. A designer handbag or pair of expensive shoes seems to work like a shield, where wielding a Fendi handbag successfully fends off romantic rivals.”


In another experiment, Griskevicius and Wang found when romantic relationships are threatened, women not only desire more expensive handbags, cars, cell phones and shoes, they also spend 32 percent more of their own money for a chance to win a luxury spending spree.

Once again, the logical mind generates a question: If women crave luxury goods as a means of protecting their relationships, what accounts for men who are equally drawn to expensive cars, cell phones etc.?

Though the article doesn’t furnish scientific backup, the researchers suggest rather than preserving a relationship, men display expensive products to attract the opposite sex.

So what does this mean in practical terms? Men should be flattered when their wives and girlfriends load up on luxury items. They’re really saying to the world, “My man buys me expensive stuff and he’s devoted. So you other gals keep your hands off.” I don’t know about you, my brothers, but I don’t feel that much better about it. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.


MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney

and Edmond resident.

Text Only
  • St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Why poverty across the world matters to Americans

    A child starving in South Sudan should matter to Americans. That was the message delivered last week by Nancy Lindborg, whose job at the U.S. Agency for International Development is to lead a federal bureau spreading democracy and humanitarian assistance across the world.
    That world has reached a critical danger zone, with three high-level crises combining military conflict with humanitarian catastrophes affecting millions of innocents in Syria, the South Sudan and the Central African Republic.
    But back to that child.

    April 18, 2014

  • Government leadership complicit in overfilling prisons

    One of the thorniest problems facing any society is the question of what to do with transgressors. Obviously, the more complicated a culture becomes, the more factors come into play in trying to figure out what to do with those who choose not to “play by the rules.”

    April 18, 2014

  • My best days are ones normal people take for granted

    It is a weekend for working around the house. My fiancee, Erin, and I have the baby’s room to paint and some IKEA furniture to assemble. I roll out of bed early — 10:30 — and get into my wheelchair. Erin is already making coffee in the kitchen.
    “I started the first wall,” she says. “I love that gray.” Erin never bugs me about sleeping late. For a few months after I was injured in the Boston Marathon bombings, I often slept 15 hours a day. The doctors said my body needed to heal. It must still be healing because I hardly ever see 8 a.m. anymore.

    April 18, 2014

  • Instead of mothballing Navy ships, give them to our allies

    A bitter debate has raged in the Pentagon for several months about the wisdom of taking the nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington out of service to save money. The Washington, at 24 years old a relatively young vessel, is due for a costly refit, a routine procedure that all of the 11 large carriers in service undergo regularly.

    April 18, 2014

  • The pessimist’s guide to grizzly bears and Earth Day

    This coming Friday, to “celebrate Earth Day,” the Walt Disney Co. will release one of those cutesy, fun-for-all-ages, nature documentaries. “Bears” is about grizzly bears.
    The trailer says, “From DisneyNature comes a story that all parents share. About the love, the joy, the struggle and the strength it takes to raise a family.”
    Talk about your misguided “Hollywood values.” I previously have acknowledged a morbid, unreasonable fear of grizzly bears, stemming from a youth misspent reading grisly grizzly-attack articles in Readers Digest. This fear is only morbid and unreasonable because I live about 1,500 miles from the nearest wild grizzly bear. Still. ...

    April 16, 2014

  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

  • Los Angeles Times: Congress extend jobless benefits again

    How’s this for irony: Having allowed federal unemployment benefits to run out in December, some lawmakers are balking at a bill to renew them retroactively because it might be hard to figure out who should receive them. Congress made this task far harder than it should have been, but the technical challenges aren’t insurmountable. Lawmakers should restore the benefits now and leave them in place until the unemployment rate reaches a more reasonable level.

    April 14, 2014

  • Many nations invested in Israel

    Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yoram Ettinger recently spoke to a gathering at the Chabad Center for Jewish Life and Learning in Oklahoma City. The event began with a presentation by Rabbi Ovadia Goldman, who told the attendee that the  upcoming Jewish holiday of Passover was an occasion for them to embrace the children of God, which is all of humanity.

    April 14, 2014

  • Coming soon: More ways to get to know your doctor

    Last week, the federal government released a massive database capable of providing patients with much more information about their doctors.
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government agency that runs Medicare, is posting on its website detailed information about how many visits and procedures individual health professionals billed the program for in 2012, and how much they were paid.
    This new trove of data, which covers 880,000 health professionals, adds to a growing body of information available to patients who don’t want to leave choosing a doctor to chance. But to put that information to good use, consumers need to be aware of what is available, what’s missing and how to interpret it.

    April 14, 2014

  • HEY HINK: Hateful bullies attempt to muffle free speech

    Hopefully we agree it should be a fundamental right to voice criticism of any religion you wish. And you should have the right to sing the praises of any religion you choose. If criticism of religion is unjust, feel free to make your best argument to prove it. If criticism is just, don’t be afraid to acknowledge and embrace it. If songs of praise are merited, feel free to join in. If not, feel free to ignore them. But no American should participate in curbing free speech just because expression of religious views makes someone uncomfortable.

    April 11, 2014


Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

     View Results