The Edmond Sun


June 6, 2014

HEY HINK: Prisoner trade deal shows lack of maturity from Obama

EDMOND — Some headlines this week have me reflecting on the hazards of immaturity. One of the common impulses American parents must overrule in dealing with immature children is this: “I want it and I don’t care how much it costs.” Maybe, the dividing line between childishness and maturity is the point where desires are carefully measured against consequences. We all know people who reach adulthood and never get past the “I-want-it-now-and-I’ll-consider-the-consequences-later,” stage of development. Usually, people like this make a shambles of their own lives and complicate the lives of everyone around them.

If the nation was saddled with a presidential administration that operated at this level of immaturity, what types of behavior might be expected from such an administration?

On the legislative level, such an administration might succumb to self-delusion about some grand scheme, like universal healthcare. That administration might allow itself to believe the objective is so beautiful we must achieve it — right this instant. Any effort to suggest that prudence requires a mature assessment of costs and consequences might be met with an impatient stamp of the foot and the assertion that, “We can’t wait. Let’s just pass it. We’ll see what’s in it later.”

Millions of “innocents” might yield to the enchantment of this dazzling idea and follow happily like children skipping after the Pied Piper without stopping to ask themselves the difficult question: “Exactly where is this pleasant music leading us?”

On the campaign trail, such an administration might be warned that statements like, “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor — period,” are untrue and the embarrassing facts are bound to come out. But truth might change the election equation. So the distortion is more apt to achieve the desired result. An immature administration would promulgate a known deceit and deal with the consequences later.

This week, our president decided to exchange five high level Taliban prisoners for a single American servicemen. Let’s credit his stated motivation. America never leaves its own behind. The timing was critical. The deal was necessary. Even so, we have no idea whether the president arrived at his decision after a mature disciplined assessment of the costs.

If we accept the president’s statement at face value, we’re lucky the Taliban didn’t demand a deed to California as part of the deal. Obviously, there’s a point where the price is too high.

The American public has been told that release of these Taliban prisoners was inevitable because the “war” was drawing to a close. Ordinarily, when hostilities end, the warring parties negotiate terms and sign a document outlining the conditions of peace. Here, there is no assurance that hostilities are doing anything but “taking a pause.” This exchange was not the result, the cause or the cost of peace.

In evaluating the wisdom of this deal, we hope the president made a mature assessment of the likelihood his decision might contribute to the deaths of Americans down the road. Would we negotiate for one serviceman if we knew the trade would cost the lives of 20 others? Of course not.

The public has no idea how much American blood was shed in the efforts to capture these prisoners. We don’t know how much American blood was on their hands at the time of their capture. We don’t know whether any or all of these known terrorists are so consumed with hatred that their thirst for American blood can never be quenched. We must pray that American service personnel of the future will not pay, with their lives, if it turns out this decision was poorly considered.

The most regrettable thing about this entire scenario is this: The default position of the American people is to trust their president. They want to know the commander-in-chief has a firm hand on the controls. They want to know that he’s making wise choices with the good of the country foremost in his mind. They want to know when the commander-in-chief addresses them he’s telling the truth. In this instance, we just don’t know.

Our confidence in the president’s competence has been shaken. Our ability to trust what he tells us has been compromised. His capacity to make mature well-reasoned decisions is questionable. We are beginning to suspect his commitment to the needs of the moment are superior to his commitment to the needs of the country. More than 2,000 years ago, Socrates made this comment about the cynical pragmatist: “In every sort of danger there are various ways of winning through if one is ready to do or say anything whatsoever.” Let’s hope things haven’t gone that far. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

Text Only
  • Welfare state grows as self-sufficiency declines

    For the past 50 years, the government’s annual poverty rate has hardly changed at all. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 15 percent of Americans still live in poverty, roughly the same rate as the mid-1960s when the War on Poverty was just starting.
    After adjusting for inflation, federal and state welfare spending today is 16 times greater than it was when President Lyndon B. Johnson launched the War on Poverty. If converted into cash, current means-tested spending is five times the amount needed to eliminate all official poverty in the U.S.
    How can the government spend so much while poverty remains unchanged? The answer is simple: The Census Bureau’s “poverty” figures are woefully incomplete.

    August 1, 2014

  • Let laughter reign in Turkey

    This week, Bulent Arinc, the Deputy Prime Minister of Turkey, verbally chastised Turkish women for laughing in public. Before we take a closer look at these remarks — in the interest of full disclosure — I need to confess a personal bias. I love to hear my wife’s laughter. Sometimes, when I review the day’s highlights, the most pleasant thing that comes to mind is her laugh — it’s frequent, genuine, pleasantly-pitched, melodious, appropriately timed, infectious and charming.

    August 1, 2014

  • Is English getting dissed?

    Is the English language being massacred by the young, the linguistically untidy and anyone who uses the Internet? Absolutely.
    Is that anything new? Hardly.
    Many words and expressions in common parlance today would have raised the hackles of language scolds in the not-so-distant past. For evidence, let’s look at some examples from recent newspaper articles.

    July 31, 2014

  • 'Too big to fail' equals 'too eager to borrow'

    Four years ago this month, President Barack Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law, promising that the 848-page financial law would “put a stop to taxpayer bailouts once and for all,” he said. But recently, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren told a Detroit crowd that “the biggest banks are even bigger than they were when they got too big to fail in 2008.”
    Who’s right?

    July 30, 2014

  • Sheltons travel for better life for family

    Some time around 1865 a mixed-race African American couple, William and Mary Shelton, made their way from Mississippi to east Texas. Nothing is known for certain of their origins in he Magnolia state, or the circumstances under which they began their new lives in Texas.

    July 29, 2014

  • Film critic Turan produces book

    Kenneth Turan, who is the film critic for National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition,” has written a book “Not to be Missed, Fifty-Four Favorites from a Life Time of Film.” His list of movies span the gamut from the beginnings of filmmaking through the present day.
    There are some surprising omissions on his list. While he includes two films, “A Touch of Evil” and Chimes at Midnight” made by Orson Welles, and one, “The Third Man,” that Welles starred in but did not direct. He did not however, include “Citizen Kane,” that was the first movie Welles made, that is  often cited by both film critics and historians as a favorite film.

    July 28, 2014

  • Logan County’s disputed zone

    Watchers of “Star Trek” may recall the episode from the original series entitled, “Day of the Dove.” In this episode, Captain Kirk and his crew are forced by a series of circumstances into a confrontation with the Klingons. The conflict eventually resolves after Kirk realizes that the circumstances have been intentionally designed by an alien force which feeds off negative emotions, especially fear and anger. Kirk and his crew communicate this fact to the Klingons and the conflict subsides. No longer feeding upon confrontation, the alien force is weakened and successfully driven away.

    July 28, 2014

  • Russell leads in Sun poll

    Polling results of an unscientific poll at show that Steve Russell, GOP candidate for the 5th District congressional seat, is in the lead with 57 percent of the vote ahead of the Aug. 26 runoff election. Thirty readers participated in the online poll.

    July 28, 2014

  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014


The runoff race for the 5th District congressional seat is set for Aug. 26. If the voting were today, which candidate would you support?

Al McAffrey
Tom Guild
     View Results