The Edmond Sun

Opinion

June 22, 2012

Party politics take over what’s best for country

EDMOND — “Contempt, a feeling that a person or thing is beneath consideration were worthless or deserving scorn or extreme reproach.” These days, our political atmosphere is poisoned by all manner of contemptuous, scornful expression. These expressions have become so toxic and common that they are fouling the orderly operation of our government. There is no mystery concerning the source of this plague. Just follow your nose and it will lead directly to the hazard George Washington described in his farewell address as “… the baneful effects of the Spirit of Party….”

President Washington believed that the tendency of representative governments to divide into competing factions was the worst enemy of those governments. He uttered this prophetic warning: “… sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty.”

Today we are watching President Washington’s prophecy come true. The latest example of President Obama’s campaign to advance his own elevation at the expense of America’s governmental institutions is the last-minute assertion of executive privilege over documents he claims he’s never seen. This campaign is characterized by unprecedented party discord punctuated by acts of bewildering contempt.

The most recent scene in the drama is fairly straightforward. Someone in the Department of Justice approved an operation that knowingly put weapons in the hands of known killers. This operation appears to have contributed to the deaths of unknown numbers of Mexican citizens and at least one American law enforcement officer. In the course of congressional investigation into this operation, the Department of Justice has, undeniably, misstated material facts on at least two occasions. After a year and a half of inquiry, the American people still don’t know who is responsible for this clearly reckless and ultimately fatal operation.

The attorney general is admittedly withholding key documents. On the eve of a House vote on whether the attorney general is in contempt of Congress, the president, after denying any knowledge about the operation, stonewalls the investigation by asserting executive privilege.

So here’s the question: are the president and the attorney general in contempt of Congress? The answer is, of course, yes. But this administration, more than any other, has demonstrated overt contempt for American institutions of government. Consider the following:

In July 2009, President Obama contemptuously accused the Cambridge, Mass., Police Department of “acting stupidly” in connection with the arrest of a black professor even though the president didn’t know the underlying facts.

In January 2010, President Obama presumed to use his State of the Union Address to contemptuously lecture the U.S. Supreme Court for daring to hand down a decision on campaign finance that he disagreed with.

In late 2009, and early 2010, President Obama used the power of his office to ram a 2,000-page health care bill through Congress in contemptuous disregard for the opinions of millions of Americans who disapproved of the tricky late-night razzle-dazzle employed by party operatives to hurry the bill through.

In January 2012, President Obama, in contemptuous disregard of the law, made appointments to federal agencies without bothering to secure the approval of the Senate.

In April 2012, President Obama attempted to bully his way into U.S. Supreme Court deliberations by falsely pronouncing in public that any decision striking down his health care bill would be “unprecedented.”

In June 2012, President Obama, on his own, crafted an amendment to America’s immigration legislation by carving out an exception to the deportation regimen and instituting an autocratically created program of renewable work permits.

Within the past few days, it has become apparent that someone in the administration has utter contempt for the laws set up to protect against the unauthorized release of America’s sensitive intelligence information. It’s too soon to say whether the president by omission or commission is guilty of contempt in this regard.

Now, the president has an 11th hour epiphany that documents requested in connection with the “Fast and Furious” investigation have somehow become protected by claim of executive privilege.

It seems clear that during the course of his presidency, Obama has engaged in behavior evidencing contempt for American law enforcement, the sensibilities of the American voters, the U.S. Supreme Court, the House of Representatives, the Senate and the Congress as a whole. Each of these instances of contempt has been met by expressions of outrage. Unfortunately, Americans have been conditioned to question whether this outrage is an expression of conscientious concern for the welfare of America, or for the promotion and protection of party advantage. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is an Edmond resident and retired attorney.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Welfare state grows as self-sufficiency declines

    For the past 50 years, the government’s annual poverty rate has hardly changed at all. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 15 percent of Americans still live in poverty, roughly the same rate as the mid-1960s when the War on Poverty was just starting.
    After adjusting for inflation, federal and state welfare spending today is 16 times greater than it was when President Lyndon B. Johnson launched the War on Poverty. If converted into cash, current means-tested spending is five times the amount needed to eliminate all official poverty in the U.S.
    How can the government spend so much while poverty remains unchanged? The answer is simple: The Census Bureau’s “poverty” figures are woefully incomplete.

    August 1, 2014

  • Let laughter reign in Turkey

    This week, Bulent Arinc, the Deputy Prime Minister of Turkey, verbally chastised Turkish women for laughing in public. Before we take a closer look at these remarks — in the interest of full disclosure — I need to confess a personal bias. I love to hear my wife’s laughter. Sometimes, when I review the day’s highlights, the most pleasant thing that comes to mind is her laugh — it’s frequent, genuine, pleasantly-pitched, melodious, appropriately timed, infectious and charming.

    August 1, 2014

  • Is English getting dissed?

    Is the English language being massacred by the young, the linguistically untidy and anyone who uses the Internet? Absolutely.
    Is that anything new? Hardly.
    Many words and expressions in common parlance today would have raised the hackles of language scolds in the not-so-distant past. For evidence, let’s look at some examples from recent newspaper articles.

    July 31, 2014

  • 'Too big to fail' equals 'too eager to borrow'

    Four years ago this month, President Barack Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law, promising that the 848-page financial law would “put a stop to taxpayer bailouts once and for all,” he said. But recently, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren told a Detroit crowd that “the biggest banks are even bigger than they were when they got too big to fail in 2008.”
    Who’s right?

    July 30, 2014

  • Sheltons travel for better life for family

    Some time around 1865 a mixed-race African American couple, William and Mary Shelton, made their way from Mississippi to east Texas. Nothing is known for certain of their origins in he Magnolia state, or the circumstances under which they began their new lives in Texas.

    July 29, 2014

  • Film critic Turan produces book

    Kenneth Turan, who is the film critic for National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition,” has written a book “Not to be Missed, Fifty-Four Favorites from a Life Time of Film.” His list of movies span the gamut from the beginnings of filmmaking through the present day.
    There are some surprising omissions on his list. While he includes two films, “A Touch of Evil” and Chimes at Midnight” made by Orson Welles, and one, “The Third Man,” that Welles starred in but did not direct. He did not however, include “Citizen Kane,” that was the first movie Welles made, that is  often cited by both film critics and historians as a favorite film.

    July 28, 2014

  • Logan County’s disputed zone

    Watchers of “Star Trek” may recall the episode from the original series entitled, “Day of the Dove.” In this episode, Captain Kirk and his crew are forced by a series of circumstances into a confrontation with the Klingons. The conflict eventually resolves after Kirk realizes that the circumstances have been intentionally designed by an alien force which feeds off negative emotions, especially fear and anger. Kirk and his crew communicate this fact to the Klingons and the conflict subsides. No longer feeding upon confrontation, the alien force is weakened and successfully driven away.

    July 28, 2014

  • Russell leads in Sun poll

    Polling results of an unscientific poll at www.edmondsun.com show that Steve Russell, GOP candidate for the 5th District congressional seat, is in the lead with 57 percent of the vote ahead of the Aug. 26 runoff election. Thirty readers participated in the online poll.

    July 28, 2014

  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

Poll

The runoff race for the 5th District congressional seat is set for Aug. 26. If the voting were today, which candidate would you support?

Al McAffrey
Tom Guild
Undecided
     View Results