The Edmond Sun

Opinion

June 22, 2012

Party politics take over what’s best for country

EDMOND — “Contempt, a feeling that a person or thing is beneath consideration were worthless or deserving scorn or extreme reproach.” These days, our political atmosphere is poisoned by all manner of contemptuous, scornful expression. These expressions have become so toxic and common that they are fouling the orderly operation of our government. There is no mystery concerning the source of this plague. Just follow your nose and it will lead directly to the hazard George Washington described in his farewell address as “… the baneful effects of the Spirit of Party….”

President Washington believed that the tendency of representative governments to divide into competing factions was the worst enemy of those governments. He uttered this prophetic warning: “… sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty.”

Today we are watching President Washington’s prophecy come true. The latest example of President Obama’s campaign to advance his own elevation at the expense of America’s governmental institutions is the last-minute assertion of executive privilege over documents he claims he’s never seen. This campaign is characterized by unprecedented party discord punctuated by acts of bewildering contempt.

The most recent scene in the drama is fairly straightforward. Someone in the Department of Justice approved an operation that knowingly put weapons in the hands of known killers. This operation appears to have contributed to the deaths of unknown numbers of Mexican citizens and at least one American law enforcement officer. In the course of congressional investigation into this operation, the Department of Justice has, undeniably, misstated material facts on at least two occasions. After a year and a half of inquiry, the American people still don’t know who is responsible for this clearly reckless and ultimately fatal operation.

The attorney general is admittedly withholding key documents. On the eve of a House vote on whether the attorney general is in contempt of Congress, the president, after denying any knowledge about the operation, stonewalls the investigation by asserting executive privilege.

So here’s the question: are the president and the attorney general in contempt of Congress? The answer is, of course, yes. But this administration, more than any other, has demonstrated overt contempt for American institutions of government. Consider the following:

In July 2009, President Obama contemptuously accused the Cambridge, Mass., Police Department of “acting stupidly” in connection with the arrest of a black professor even though the president didn’t know the underlying facts.

In January 2010, President Obama presumed to use his State of the Union Address to contemptuously lecture the U.S. Supreme Court for daring to hand down a decision on campaign finance that he disagreed with.

In late 2009, and early 2010, President Obama used the power of his office to ram a 2,000-page health care bill through Congress in contemptuous disregard for the opinions of millions of Americans who disapproved of the tricky late-night razzle-dazzle employed by party operatives to hurry the bill through.

In January 2012, President Obama, in contemptuous disregard of the law, made appointments to federal agencies without bothering to secure the approval of the Senate.

In April 2012, President Obama attempted to bully his way into U.S. Supreme Court deliberations by falsely pronouncing in public that any decision striking down his health care bill would be “unprecedented.”

In June 2012, President Obama, on his own, crafted an amendment to America’s immigration legislation by carving out an exception to the deportation regimen and instituting an autocratically created program of renewable work permits.

Within the past few days, it has become apparent that someone in the administration has utter contempt for the laws set up to protect against the unauthorized release of America’s sensitive intelligence information. It’s too soon to say whether the president by omission or commission is guilty of contempt in this regard.

Now, the president has an 11th hour epiphany that documents requested in connection with the “Fast and Furious” investigation have somehow become protected by claim of executive privilege.

It seems clear that during the course of his presidency, Obama has engaged in behavior evidencing contempt for American law enforcement, the sensibilities of the American voters, the U.S. Supreme Court, the House of Representatives, the Senate and the Congress as a whole. Each of these instances of contempt has been met by expressions of outrage. Unfortunately, Americans have been conditioned to question whether this outrage is an expression of conscientious concern for the welfare of America, or for the promotion and protection of party advantage. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is an Edmond resident and retired attorney.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Loosening constraints on campaign donations and spending doesn’t destroy democracy

    Campaign finance reformers are worried about the future. They contend that two Supreme Court rulings — the McCutcheon decision in March and the 2010 Citizens United decision — will magnify inequality in U.S. politics.
    In both cases, the court majority relaxed constraints on how money can be spent on or donated to political campaigns. By allowing more private money to flow to campaigns, the critics maintain, the court has allowed the rich an unfair advantage in shaping political outcomes and made “one dollar, one vote” (in one formulation) the measure of our corrupted democracy.
    This argument misses the mark for at least four reasons.

    April 23, 2014

  • The top 12 government programs ever

    Which federal programs and policies succeed in being cost-effective and targeting those who need them most? These two tests are obvious: After all, why would we spend taxpayers' money on a program that isn't worth what it costs or helps those who do not need help?

    April 23, 2014

  • Free trade on steroids: The threat of the Trans-Pacific Partnership

    Many supporters of the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, trade agreement are arguing that its fate rests on President Obama’s bilateral talks with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in Japan this week. If Japan and the United States can sort out market access issues for agriculture and automobiles, the wisdom goes, this huge deal — in effect, a North American Free Trade Agreement on steroids — can at last be concluded.

    April 22, 2014

  • Can Hillary Clinton rock the cradle and the world?

    What's most interesting to contemplate is the effect becoming a grandmother will have on Hillary's ambition. It's one of life's unfairnesses that a woman's peak career years often coincide with her peak childbearing years.

    April 22, 2014

  • Chicago Tribune: If Walgreen Co. moves its HQ to Europe, blame Washington’s tax failure

    The Walgreen Co. drugstore chain got its start nearly a century ago in downstate Dixon, Ill., before moving its corporate headquarters to Chicago and eventually to north suburban Deerfield, Ill.
    Next stop? Could be Bern, Switzerland.
    A group of shareholders reportedly is pressuring the giant retail chain for a move to the land of cuckoo clocks. The reason: lower taxes. Much lower taxes.
    If Walgreen changes its legal domicile to Switzerland, where it recently acquired a stake in European drugstore chain Alliance Boots, the company could save big bucks on its corporate income-tax bill. The effective U.S. income-tax rate for Walgreen, according to analysts at Swiss Bank UBS: 37 percent. For Alliance Boots: about 20 percent.

    April 21, 2014

  • Sulphur a future major tourist destination?

    Greta Garbo says, “I want to be alone,” in the 1932 film “Grand Hotel.” That MGM film starred Garbo, John and Lionel Barrymore, Wallace Beery and a young actress from Lawton named Joan Crawford. It told the stories of several different people who were staying at an exclusive hotel of that name in Berlin Germany.
    It was critically well received and it inspired more recent films such as “Gosford Park” and television shows such as “Downton Abbey” in that it detailed the relationship between powerful and wealthy people and those who served them. The film opened amidst much fanfare and it received the Oscar for best picture in the year of its release.

    April 21, 2014

  • St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Why poverty across the world matters to Americans

    A child starving in South Sudan should matter to Americans. That was the message delivered last week by Nancy Lindborg, whose job at the U.S. Agency for International Development is to lead a federal bureau spreading democracy and humanitarian assistance across the world.
    That world has reached a critical danger zone, with three high-level crises combining military conflict with humanitarian catastrophes affecting millions of innocents in Syria, the South Sudan and the Central African Republic.
    But back to that child.

    April 18, 2014

  • Government leadership complicit in overfilling prisons

    One of the thorniest problems facing any society is the question of what to do with transgressors. Obviously, the more complicated a culture becomes, the more factors come into play in trying to figure out what to do with those who choose not to “play by the rules.”

    April 18, 2014

  • My best days are ones normal people take for granted

    It is a weekend for working around the house. My fiancee, Erin, and I have the baby’s room to paint and some IKEA furniture to assemble. I roll out of bed early — 10:30 — and get into my wheelchair. Erin is already making coffee in the kitchen.
    “I started the first wall,” she says. “I love that gray.” Erin never bugs me about sleeping late. For a few months after I was injured in the Boston Marathon bombings, I often slept 15 hours a day. The doctors said my body needed to heal. It must still be healing because I hardly ever see 8 a.m. anymore.

    April 18, 2014

  • Instead of mothballing Navy ships, give them to our allies

    A bitter debate has raged in the Pentagon for several months about the wisdom of taking the nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington out of service to save money. The Washington, at 24 years old a relatively young vessel, is due for a costly refit, a routine procedure that all of the 11 large carriers in service undergo regularly.

    April 18, 2014

Poll

Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

Agree
Disagree
Undecided
     View Results