The Edmond Sun


February 3, 2014

Maybe Legislature should not consider policy bills next year

GUTHRIE — Last week I wrote that it should be the goal of the Legislature to reduce the number of laws. Over the years, the number of state statutes has greatly increased, even though voters elected a new wave of small government conservatives.

Some may have felt that the vision articulated in last week’s article was a bit naive. You may recall the accompanying photo that showed Oklahoma’s 2011 law books towering over their counterparts from 2001. Can we really stop the out-of-control creation of new laws?

A possible solution has recently been discussed by various House members: What if Oklahoma adopted a system used by other states where policy proposals only could be considered every other year?

This would have three key benefits.

First, it would cut down on the amount of proposed laws. The proposals that are frivolous or unnecessary may not survive the test of time created by the two-year interval. This would result in fewer new laws, and when this reform is accompanied by our continued repealer efforts, perhaps we could reach our goal of repealing old laws as quickly as new ones are approved.

Second, legislators would be given a free hand to focus on the state budget in the non-policy years. Lawmakers constantly and correctly complain of their inability to get a handle on government spending. They appropriate millions of dollars each year only to be attacked for more money from the very recipients of that money during the ensuing months. They don’t have time to follow up and monitor the new spending before they are placed under the gun for even more.

When faced with the challenge of voting on and sponsoring policy, these lawmakers don’t focus on budget accountability as carefully as they should. They know they are falling short and not meeting the expectation of taxpayers to provide good stewardship, and it bothers them. They want the opportunity for more oversight!

Partly because of this sentiment, the House and Senate have made significant progress toward enhancing the budget oversight infrastructure. Both chambers have approved committees to monitor non-appropriated spending and the House has significantly expanded its appropriations subcommittees. They would benefit from an oversight environment in which they can solely focus on and expose the millions of wasteful spending that constantly occurs within state and local government. This will provide them with much more strength to resist the countless cries for new funding.

Third, it’s important to realize that many regulations occur through the propagation of agency-issued rules. A year free of policy proposals would allow our administrative rules overseers to greatly increase oversight of proposed rules. Perhaps lawmakers could even start repealing existing rules.

This common-sense reform would empower lawmakers to carry out their true responsibility to the taxpayers, as opposed to considering new and unnecessary laws every year.

Please mark your calendar for 7 p.m. Feb. 24 at Waterloo Road Baptist Church for the House District 31 town hall meeting. Our invited guest is House Speaker T.W. Shannon. If you can attend, I look forward to seeing you there.

REP. JASON MURPHEY, R-Guthrie, represents House District 31, which encompasses all of Logan County and a portion of northern Edmond. He may be reached via email at


Text Only
  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

  • Los Angeles Times: Congress extend jobless benefits again

    How’s this for irony: Having allowed federal unemployment benefits to run out in December, some lawmakers are balking at a bill to renew them retroactively because it might be hard to figure out who should receive them. Congress made this task far harder than it should have been, but the technical challenges aren’t insurmountable. Lawmakers should restore the benefits now and leave them in place until the unemployment rate reaches a more reasonable level.

    April 14, 2014

  • Many nations invested in Israel

    Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yoram Ettinger recently spoke to a gathering at the Chabad Center for Jewish Life and Learning in Oklahoma City. The event began with a presentation by Rabbi Ovadia Goldman, who told the attendee that the  upcoming Jewish holiday of Passover was an occasion for them to embrace the children of God, which is all of humanity.

    April 14, 2014

  • Coming soon: More ways to get to know your doctor

    Last week, the federal government released a massive database capable of providing patients with much more information about their doctors.
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government agency that runs Medicare, is posting on its website detailed information about how many visits and procedures individual health professionals billed the program for in 2012, and how much they were paid.
    This new trove of data, which covers 880,000 health professionals, adds to a growing body of information available to patients who don’t want to leave choosing a doctor to chance. But to put that information to good use, consumers need to be aware of what is available, what’s missing and how to interpret it.

    April 14, 2014

  • HEY HINK: Hateful bullies attempt to muffle free speech

    Hopefully we agree it should be a fundamental right to voice criticism of any religion you wish. And you should have the right to sing the praises of any religion you choose. If criticism of religion is unjust, feel free to make your best argument to prove it. If criticism is just, don’t be afraid to acknowledge and embrace it. If songs of praise are merited, feel free to join in. If not, feel free to ignore them. But no American should participate in curbing free speech just because expression of religious views makes someone uncomfortable.

    April 11, 2014

  • Putting Oklahoma parents in charge

    Oklahoma’s public schools serve many children very well. Still, for various reasons, some students’ needs are better met in private schools, in virtual schools or elsewhere. That is why two state lawmakers have introduced legislation to give parents debit cards, literally, to shop for the educational services that work best for their children.

    April 11, 2014

  • Israelis, Palestinians are losing their chance

    Developments in the Middle East suggest that prospects of success for the Israeli-Palestinian talks, to which Secretary of State John Kerry has devoted countless hours and trips, are weakening.

    April 11, 2014

  • Teens might trade naked selfies for mugshots

    Will teenagers ever learn? You think yours will. Maybe so. But it's likely that was also the hope of the parents of children who were so shamed by nude photos of themselves that went south - how else can they go - that they killed themselves.

    April 11, 2014

  • Tax deadline and no reform in sight

    The annual tax filing deadline, which comes next Tuesday, provides a good opportunity for tax reform advocates to decry the current law’s increasing complexity and inequities, and to urge enactment of a simpler, fairer system.

    April 10, 2014

  • To get quality care, it helps to be the right kind of patient

    I am a family physician. Sometimes I must step out of the comfort of my clinical role and into that of patient or family caregiver. Generally, these trips to the other side of the exam table inspire a fair amount of anxiety.

    April 8, 2014


Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

     View Results