The Edmond Sun

Opinion

September 28, 2013

Monumental consequences coming in health care

EDMOND — Today we are witnessing one of the most monumental political battles in America’s history. No United States citizen has the luxury of being a bystander. We are all participants in this scrap whether we like it or not. When the dust settles, millions of Americans might well be better off where their health care is concerned. But it’s also true that every single American may be a giant step closer to becoming an involuntary servant to a bloated, insatiable federal government.

The potentially onerous fallout won’t just rain down on the heads of today’s combatants. The withering effects may prove to be a burden on our children and their children to an extent no one but a bona fide clairvoyant could calculate.

Unfortunately, much of the debate surrounding Obamacare is so hysterical and lacking in reason that many of the partisans are incapable of discussing the issues rationally. Neither side has a monopoly on sympathy, good sense and clear thinking. Both sides have their share of liars, bullies and self-promoters. But it’s crucial for the good of the country and our descendants to be cool-headed in our analysis.

Let’s consider the undeniable facts. This act represents the most intense intrusion of the federal government into the health decisions of the American public in history. Everyone concedes there must be some overhaul of America’s health care system. But Obamacare threatens to do more harm than good. In the run-up to the act’s passage, it was presented to the American public clothed in the most pleasing promises; everyone will have healthcare, costs will go down, families making less than $250,000 a year won’t pay one dime in additional taxes, no tax payer satisfied with their current doctor would be forced to change, “we promise.”

There were no meaningful opportunities to analyze the law prior to passage. It comprised a monstrous 2,000 pages of confusing legal jargon. It was not placed in final form until brief hours prior to congressional vote. This left no realistic chance for legislators to review the details prior to reaching a decision.

Apprehensions in this regard were dismissed by the Speaker of the House who reassured us that we could find out what was in the bill after it was passed. This unwieldy conglomeration of a congressional act was passed under cover of darkness by a Democratically-controlled Congress and signed by a Democratic president. In doing so, Congress and the president ignored the misgivings and resistance of the American people and brushed aside any real effort to consult with Republican legislators. Even then, the act could not clear the technical procedural hurdles without unsavory back room wheeling and dealing with some favored senators. Enforcement of the most intrusive act in American history was placed in the hands of the IRS, the most dangerous bureau in the government.

Almost at once, the administration began to relieve certain entities from the act requirements by doling out waivers — thousands of them. Most notably, the Congress, in an act of unbelievable hypocrisy, exempted itself from participation in Obamacare.

As the act drew closer to implementation, we learned, rosy promises notwithstanding, that thousands of Americans would lose their preferred physicians, millions would see rises in their insurance premiums, deductibles and out-of-pocket expenses. As the nation’s businesses stumbled their way through the unbelievably complex maze of Obamacare regulations, it became apparent that the act provided incentives for the cancellation or delay of new hiring. It also provided incentives for employers to reduce the number of full-time employees which they accomplished by cutting hours of lower wage earners.

As the disastrous contours of the act’s real impact became clearer, even the president’s allies in Congress warned about the upcoming “train wreck.” Important unions who were tireless advocates for passage of the law now realize it will impose crushing burdens on their members. Many of them are joining the chorus of those crying out for a “re-do.”

The president, himself, recognizes that Obamacare is simply unworkable as drafted and passed. Time and again, he has postponed deadlines for implementation because this clumsy juggernaut is simply not working in real life as they hoped it would in theory. And now we learn, to our dismay (if not surprise) the IRS really cannot be trusted to be fair.

No doubt, many supporters of the act are motivated by genuine concern for the plight of the less fortunate. But no one believes Obamacare is the best we can do. Let’s remember. No matter how concerned we may be for the agonies of someone dying of thirst, we do no kindnesses by providing water that is poisoned. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Loosening constraints on campaign donations and spending doesn’t destroy democracy

    Campaign finance reformers are worried about the future. They contend that two Supreme Court rulings — the McCutcheon decision in March and the 2010 Citizens United decision — will magnify inequality in U.S. politics.
    In both cases, the court majority relaxed constraints on how money can be spent on or donated to political campaigns. By allowing more private money to flow to campaigns, the critics maintain, the court has allowed the rich an unfair advantage in shaping political outcomes and made “one dollar, one vote” (in one formulation) the measure of our corrupted democracy.
    This argument misses the mark for at least four reasons.

    April 23, 2014

  • The top 12 government programs ever

    Which federal programs and policies succeed in being cost-effective and targeting those who need them most? These two tests are obvious: After all, why would we spend taxpayers' money on a program that isn't worth what it costs or helps those who do not need help?

    April 23, 2014

  • Free trade on steroids: The threat of the Trans-Pacific Partnership

    Many supporters of the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, trade agreement are arguing that its fate rests on President Obama’s bilateral talks with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in Japan this week. If Japan and the United States can sort out market access issues for agriculture and automobiles, the wisdom goes, this huge deal — in effect, a North American Free Trade Agreement on steroids — can at last be concluded.

    April 22, 2014

  • Can Hillary Clinton rock the cradle and the world?

    What's most interesting to contemplate is the effect becoming a grandmother will have on Hillary's ambition. It's one of life's unfairnesses that a woman's peak career years often coincide with her peak childbearing years.

    April 22, 2014

  • Chicago Tribune: If Walgreen Co. moves its HQ to Europe, blame Washington’s tax failure

    The Walgreen Co. drugstore chain got its start nearly a century ago in downstate Dixon, Ill., before moving its corporate headquarters to Chicago and eventually to north suburban Deerfield, Ill.
    Next stop? Could be Bern, Switzerland.
    A group of shareholders reportedly is pressuring the giant retail chain for a move to the land of cuckoo clocks. The reason: lower taxes. Much lower taxes.
    If Walgreen changes its legal domicile to Switzerland, where it recently acquired a stake in European drugstore chain Alliance Boots, the company could save big bucks on its corporate income-tax bill. The effective U.S. income-tax rate for Walgreen, according to analysts at Swiss Bank UBS: 37 percent. For Alliance Boots: about 20 percent.

    April 21, 2014

  • Sulphur a future major tourist destination?

    Greta Garbo says, “I want to be alone,” in the 1932 film “Grand Hotel.” That MGM film starred Garbo, John and Lionel Barrymore, Wallace Beery and a young actress from Lawton named Joan Crawford. It told the stories of several different people who were staying at an exclusive hotel of that name in Berlin Germany.
    It was critically well received and it inspired more recent films such as “Gosford Park” and television shows such as “Downton Abbey” in that it detailed the relationship between powerful and wealthy people and those who served them. The film opened amidst much fanfare and it received the Oscar for best picture in the year of its release.

    April 21, 2014

  • St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Why poverty across the world matters to Americans

    A child starving in South Sudan should matter to Americans. That was the message delivered last week by Nancy Lindborg, whose job at the U.S. Agency for International Development is to lead a federal bureau spreading democracy and humanitarian assistance across the world.
    That world has reached a critical danger zone, with three high-level crises combining military conflict with humanitarian catastrophes affecting millions of innocents in Syria, the South Sudan and the Central African Republic.
    But back to that child.

    April 18, 2014

  • Government leadership complicit in overfilling prisons

    One of the thorniest problems facing any society is the question of what to do with transgressors. Obviously, the more complicated a culture becomes, the more factors come into play in trying to figure out what to do with those who choose not to “play by the rules.”

    April 18, 2014

  • My best days are ones normal people take for granted

    It is a weekend for working around the house. My fiancee, Erin, and I have the baby’s room to paint and some IKEA furniture to assemble. I roll out of bed early — 10:30 — and get into my wheelchair. Erin is already making coffee in the kitchen.
    “I started the first wall,” she says. “I love that gray.” Erin never bugs me about sleeping late. For a few months after I was injured in the Boston Marathon bombings, I often slept 15 hours a day. The doctors said my body needed to heal. It must still be healing because I hardly ever see 8 a.m. anymore.

    April 18, 2014

  • Instead of mothballing Navy ships, give them to our allies

    A bitter debate has raged in the Pentagon for several months about the wisdom of taking the nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington out of service to save money. The Washington, at 24 years old a relatively young vessel, is due for a costly refit, a routine procedure that all of the 11 large carriers in service undergo regularly.

    April 18, 2014

Poll

Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

Agree
Disagree
Undecided
     View Results