The Edmond Sun


May 9, 2014

HEY HINK: Democrats should stop Benghazi boycott talk

EDMOND — When you read this column, the issue may be resolved in a responsible fashion. It may have been wrongly decided, in which case we must all prepare to endure another round of petty partisan outrage. If the issue is still open for discussion, the voice of the American people might be helpful.

This week, John Boehner, Speaker of the House, decided to appoint a select committee to investigate the facts surrounding the attack on our diplomatic facility in Benghazi. As of the writing of this column, minority leader, Nancy Pelosi, and Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer have transmitted a letter to the speaker objecting to the select committee’s organization. They demand changes including an equal number of Democratic members on the committee. As matters now stand, the committee will be comprised of seven Republicans and five Democrats.

If Republicans don’t yield to Democratic demands, there is rumbling there will be a Democratic “boycott.” Jim Clyburn, one of the Democratic leaders, says boycott is likely. The ostensible justification for the boycott threat is this: If you don’t do it our way, it’s a waste of time and we won’t participate.

Such a boycott would be bad for the Democratic Party. Here’s why. Even if this is a flawed tool, it may be the only tool available to get the comprehensive facts surrounding the Benghazi tragedy. But a boycott is also bad for the people. It may be a short-term expedient to a partisan agenda, but it delivers another needless blow to the people’s confidence in their government.

Let’s examine the stated reasons why a boycott is justified.

Reason No. 1: We already have all the facts. If this is true, the only downside to convening the committee is the time and money spent arriving at the conclusion that we already knew everything we needed to know. But if the time and money spent disposes of the groundswell of suspicion that facts are being concealed, it’s time and money well spent.

Even if the committee’s time and effort proves a waste, there’s an aroma of hypocrisy hovering around a determination not to participate in this particular waste. American voters are accustomed to seeing their Congress wallow in wasteful practices. When some legislator indignantly refuses to participate in some wasteful activity, voters would be justified in wondering, “Why is this particular waste more offensive than the usual variety of gross waste you participate in every day?” Voters would be justified in suspecting there’s more to this “waste” than meets the eye.

But what if there is still important evidence being withheld? Is there any reason to believe this is a possibility?

There’s no need to review the long roster of misstatements, distortions, half-truths, omissions and surprising revelations that plagued every effort to get to the truth about what happened in Benghazi. At numerous points along the way, we’ve been told, “OK, now you have all the important facts.” Each time this assertion is made, something new emerges. The recent Rhodes email indicating there was greater White House involvement in the initial misrepresentation is sufficient smoke to believe there are still some undiscovered flames.

Reason No. 2: If Democrats can’t have equal membership, they won’t participate. Since there are numerous instances where the majority party constitutes committees with majority membership this objection has a whiff of cynical pretext. One of the most common dodges in the “spoiled child” playbook is, “play by my rules or I won’t play at all.” There’s no need to spend much time explaining why boycott on this basis would be … unworthy.

If Democrats boycott and nothing new emerges, Republicans will get a credibility boost for “letting the chips fall where they may.” Democrats may have the pleasure of smirking, “told ya so.” But there’s not much mileage to be gained from a rejoinder like this if the inquiry is justified in the first place.

On the other hand, if additional damaging evidence comes to light, voters might suspect these embarrassing facts are the real reason for the boycott. They might suspect the true motivation for attempting to sabotage the committee’s work is a desire to conceal the truth.

But the real losers in a boycott would be the American voters. The momentum in the level of dysfunction plaguing our government is picking up speed by the day. Someone has to slow this momentum down or we’ll all get suffocated. A boycott would be a new low in partisan tantrums.          

Hopefully, as you read this column, everyone has come to their senses. If not, the American voter must speak up and demand that the Congress do its job. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

Text Only
  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

  • Remembering lessons from 1974

    This week marks the 40th anniversary of an important milestone in America’s constitutional history. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to order the Nixon White House to turn over audiotapes that would prove the president and his close aides were guilty of criminal violations. This ruling established with crystal clarity that the executive branch could not hide behind the shield of executive privilege to protect itself from the consequences of illegal behavior. It was a triumph for the continued vitality of our constitutional form of government.

    July 25, 2014

  • RedBlueAmerica: Is parenting being criminalized in America?

    Debra Harrell was arrested recently after the McDonald’s employee let her daughter spend the day playing in a nearby park while she worked her shift. The South Carolina woman says her daughter had a cell phone in case of danger, and critics say that children once were given the independence to spend a few unsupervised hours in a park.
    Is it a crime to parent “free-range” kids? Does Harrell deserve her problems? Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuk, the RedBlueAmerica columnists, debate the issue.

    July 24, 2014

  • Technology that will stimulate journalism’s future is now here

    To say technology has changed the newspaper media industry is understating the obvious. While much discussion focuses on how we read the news, technology is changing the way we report the news. The image of a reporter showing up to a scene with a pen and a pad is iconic but lost to the vestiges of time.
    I am asked frequently about the future of newspapers and, in particular, what does a successful future look like. For journalists, to be successful is to command multiple technologies and share news with readers in new and exciting ways.

    July 23, 2014

  • New Orleans features its own “Running of the Bulls”

    On July12, the streets of the Warehouse District of New Orleans were filled with thousands of young men who were seeking to avoid being hit with plastic bats wielded by women on roller skates as part of the annual “Running of the Bulls” that takes place in New Orleans.
    The event is based on the “Running of the Bulls” that occurs in Pamplona, Spain, that is  part of an annual occurrence in which a group of bulls rampage through the streets of Pamplona while men run from them to avoid being gored by their sharp horns. That event was introduced to the English-speaking world by Ernest Hemingway, who included scenes from it in his critically acclaimed 1926 novel “The Sun also Rises.”

    July 22, 2014

  • OTHER VIEW: Newsday: Lapses on deadly diseases demand explanation

    When we heard that the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had created a potentially lethal safety risk by improperly sending deadly pathogens — like anthrax — to other laboratories around the country, our first reaction was disbelief.

    July 22, 2014

  • Holding government accountable for open meeting violations

    A few weeks ago I wrote about the recent success of three important government transparency proposals which will go into law this year.

    July 21, 2014

  • GUEST OPINION — Oklahoma GOP voters want educational choices

    A Braun Research survey released in January showed that Oklahoma voters — Republicans, Democrats, and Independents alike — favor parental choice in education.

    July 21, 2014

  • HEY HINK: IRS interferes with citizens’ rights of free speech

    The patient is gravely ill. We have detected traces of a deadly venom in the bloodstream. We don’t know how widespread the poison is, but we know, if not counteracted, toxins of this kind can rot the patient’s vital organs and could ultimately prove fatal.

    July 19, 2014


If the Republican runoff for the 5th District congressional seat were today, which candidate would you vote for?

Patrice Douglas
Steve Russell
     View Results