The Edmond Sun

Opinion

June 29, 2012

'Bait and switch' may be biggest U.S. tax hike

EDMOND — According to legend, Shi Huangdi, the first Emperor of China, was obsessed with immortality. He couldn’t conceive of a world deprived of his imperial presence. Consequently, his minions scoured the world in search of the elixir of immortality. Unfortunately for the Emperor, the elixir was never found. He died while on a journey two months distant from his capitol. His courtiers feared that news of the Emperor’s death would spark unrest throughout the empire. They hatched a plan to conceal Shi Huangdi death until they returned to the capitol to see a new emperor safely enthroned.

Problem was, on a two-month return trip, the Emperor’s body was bound to “ripen.” Someone was apt to suspect the truth. These devious courtiers came up with a crafty device to keep the Emperor’s subjects in the dark. They loaded two carts with rotting fish; one before the royal convoy, the other at the rear. The stench of these decoys overpowered the decaying remains of Shi Huangdi. The deceit worked. By the time the truth emerged, the new regime was in place and the oppressed subjects were stuck with it.

The moral of the story is this: If the emperor’s caravan smells like a load of rotting fish, somebody’s hiding something.

This story was on my mind this week as I followed the news coverage of the Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of “The Affordable Health Care Act” — also known as “AHA” or “Obamacare.”

By now, the nation knows the court determined Obamacare is a constitutional exercise of congressional taxing authority.

In the president’s post-decision remarks, he encouraged all Americans to let bygones be bygones. He urged us all to resist the temptation to “rehash” the debates leading up to the statute’s passage. He assured us we would all look back in years to come and be thankful for this groundbreaking legislation.

But here’s the problem. Something still smells funny and the president, so far, has done nothing to clear the air. The original legislative package was deceptively portrayed by the president and his courtiers. In fairness, now that the truth about the content is exposed, shouldn’t we take another look? Or are we, like Shi Huangdi’s disgusted subjects, stuck with it?

The American public was told — unequivocally — that Obamacare was not a tax increase. In an interview on nationwide television, President Obama insisted, somewhat angrily, that “I absolutely reject that notion.” He insisted again and again in interviews and addresses to Congress that he wouldn’t raise taxes on the middle class by “one dime.” In the public campaign leading up to the legislative vote, the White House website proclaimed “What President Obama is proposing is not a tax, but a requirement to comply with the law … .” When Jeff Zients, then acting White House budget director, appeared before Congress, he was asked whether the president’s proposed legislation was a tax. He replied “No.”

When Health and Human Services Secretary Sibelius appeared before Congress, she was asked to explain the administration’s position as there were conflicting signals coming from the White House. She responded by saying “It operates in the same way as a tax would operate, but it is not, per se, a tax.”

But in the course of litigation over the constitutionality of the act, the Obama administration took both positions — “It is a tax, it isn’t a tax.” Justice Samuel Alito seemed to indicate some frustration with the plastic nature of the administration’s position by observing, “Today you are arguing that the penalty is not a tax … . Tomorrow you’re going to be back and you’ll be arguing that the penalty is a tax.”

Now we know. It is, undeniably, a tax. In fact, with all the figuring and refiguring concerning the ultimate cost of Obamacare, this may turn out to be one of the largest tax increases in the history of this nation.

Ordinarily, once the Supreme Court has spoken, the litigated issue is put to rest — at least temporarily. In this case, however, the American taxpayer is the victim of one of the most blatant “bait and switch” schemes in history. No one has a crystal ball, of course, but it is highly unlikely this act would have passed if those legislators voting for it had come clean with their constituents.

Luckily, our system works. The Supreme Court has thrown the issue back in the lap of the voting public. As we approach the upcoming election, we have clear choices. Will we call the deceivers to account? Or will we shrug it off as business as usual? Personally, I could use some fresh air. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is an Edmond resident and retired attorney.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • The pessimist’s guide to grizzly bears and Earth Day

    This coming Friday, to “celebrate Earth Day,” the Walt Disney Co. will release one of those cutesy, fun-for-all-ages, nature documentaries. “Bears” is about grizzly bears.
    The trailer says, “From DisneyNature comes a story that all parents share. About the love, the joy, the struggle and the strength it takes to raise a family.”
    Talk about your misguided “Hollywood values.” I previously have acknowledged a morbid, unreasonable fear of grizzly bears, stemming from a youth misspent reading grisly grizzly-attack articles in Readers Digest. This fear is only morbid and unreasonable because I live about 1,500 miles from the nearest wild grizzly bear. Still. ...

    April 16, 2014

  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

  • Los Angeles Times: Congress extend jobless benefits again

    How’s this for irony: Having allowed federal unemployment benefits to run out in December, some lawmakers are balking at a bill to renew them retroactively because it might be hard to figure out who should receive them. Congress made this task far harder than it should have been, but the technical challenges aren’t insurmountable. Lawmakers should restore the benefits now and leave them in place until the unemployment rate reaches a more reasonable level.

    April 14, 2014

  • Many nations invested in Israel

    Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yoram Ettinger recently spoke to a gathering at the Chabad Center for Jewish Life and Learning in Oklahoma City. The event began with a presentation by Rabbi Ovadia Goldman, who told the attendee that the  upcoming Jewish holiday of Passover was an occasion for them to embrace the children of God, which is all of humanity.

    April 14, 2014

  • Coming soon: More ways to get to know your doctor

    Last week, the federal government released a massive database capable of providing patients with much more information about their doctors.
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government agency that runs Medicare, is posting on its website detailed information about how many visits and procedures individual health professionals billed the program for in 2012, and how much they were paid.
    This new trove of data, which covers 880,000 health professionals, adds to a growing body of information available to patients who don’t want to leave choosing a doctor to chance. But to put that information to good use, consumers need to be aware of what is available, what’s missing and how to interpret it.

    April 14, 2014

  • HEY HINK: Hateful bullies attempt to muffle free speech

    Hopefully we agree it should be a fundamental right to voice criticism of any religion you wish. And you should have the right to sing the praises of any religion you choose. If criticism of religion is unjust, feel free to make your best argument to prove it. If criticism is just, don’t be afraid to acknowledge and embrace it. If songs of praise are merited, feel free to join in. If not, feel free to ignore them. But no American should participate in curbing free speech just because expression of religious views makes someone uncomfortable.

    April 11, 2014

  • Putting Oklahoma parents in charge

    Oklahoma’s public schools serve many children very well. Still, for various reasons, some students’ needs are better met in private schools, in virtual schools or elsewhere. That is why two state lawmakers have introduced legislation to give parents debit cards, literally, to shop for the educational services that work best for their children.

    April 11, 2014

  • Israelis, Palestinians are losing their chance

    Developments in the Middle East suggest that prospects of success for the Israeli-Palestinian talks, to which Secretary of State John Kerry has devoted countless hours and trips, are weakening.

    April 11, 2014

  • Teens might trade naked selfies for mugshots

    Will teenagers ever learn? You think yours will. Maybe so. But it's likely that was also the hope of the parents of children who were so shamed by nude photos of themselves that went south - how else can they go - that they killed themselves.

    April 11, 2014

  • Tax deadline and no reform in sight

    The annual tax filing deadline, which comes next Tuesday, provides a good opportunity for tax reform advocates to decry the current law’s increasing complexity and inequities, and to urge enactment of a simpler, fairer system.

    April 10, 2014

Poll

Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

Agree
Disagree
Undecided
     View Results