The Edmond Sun

Opinion

August 30, 2012

Ayn Rand: A force in the 2012 election?

STILLWATER — The selection of Paul Ryan as the Republican vice presidential candidate has brought to the surface the prominence of Ayn Rand as the idealist of a prominent group of U.S. political figures.

Ryan has remarked, “The reason I got involved in public service, by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, one person, it would be Ayn Rand. And the fight we are in here … is a fight between individualism versus collectivism.”

Interestingly, Alan Greenspan, our previous chairman of the Federal Reserve System, wrote in his recent book “Ayn Rand became a stabilizing force in my life. … By the time … Nixon campaigned for the presidency in 1968 … I had decided to … advance free-market capitalism as an insider, rather than as a critical pamphleteer.”

Ayn Rand literally stood beside him as he took the oath of office as chairman of the Nixon Council of Economic Advisors. Ayn Rand was his model. Greenspan was one of the leaders who led the movement to deregulate banks and other businesses, and thus contributed to our present recession.

And apparently, according to his 2009 public statements, Ayn Rand is Paul Ryan’s idealist mentor for shaping public policy. It has become rather common knowledge that Grover Norquist, the pusher of no tax increase pledges in Congress, is committed to the same idealist philosopher.

And it is obvious that the so-called Tea Party, supporting Paul Ryan, is inspired by the Ayn Rand idealism. Other national figures who are devotees of Ayn Rand include Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, Congressman Ron Paul of Texas and his son, Sen. Rand Paul of Tennessee.

History is replete with idealist philosophers promoting revolution in politics and government. Everyone is acquainted with Karl Marx’s lengthy and rambling writings that Lenin and Stalin of Russia and Mao of China were guided by in establishing new political and economic systems.

Marx even predicted the fading of government organization, as his ideals came into play. However, in both Russia and China, cruel, vicious political systems came into existence that destroyed millions of lives and imposed hardships on the general population.

Or, one can reflect on the Nazi system in Germany based on Mein Kampf, or the Fascist system in Italy. Attempts at putting idealist systems in place have been very costly, even deadly, to general populations.

Are we facing another idealist effort that could be extremely costly to the general population of the United States? Let’s examine the Ayn Rand idealist philosophy that through her writings and organized efforts have influenced a large number of Americans.

Ayn Rand was not a communist, nor was she a fascist. Her writings, which have been prominent since 1943, are still popular — unusually so.

Rand migrated to the U.S. from the Soviet Union in 1926, after graduating from the University of Petrograd, where she studied philosophy and history. She had witnessed the terrible violence and disarray of the Communist revolution in Russia, and her parents had lost their business.

Early in her life she decided to be a philosopher and author. She became quite accomplished writing fiction (Fountainhead, 1943, and Atlas Shrugged, 1957) philosophical works in the 1930s and after.

She died in 1982, but her works are very much alive in promoting her philosophy of objectivism.

Rand’s concept of reality is that it “exists independent of man’s consciousness, independent of any observer’s knowledge, beliefs, feeling, desires or fears. This means … that facts are facts …and that the task of man’s consciousness is to perceive reality, not to create or invent it.”

Objectivism does not permit man to believe in any supernatural being or to create his own reality. Officials of Paul Ryan’s church have scolded him for placing a greater emphasis on the teachings of Ayn Rand than on the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Rand argues that man is rational and is fully capable of understanding reality. “… the choice that controls all the choices you make and determines your life and character” is determined by reason.

No other forces considered beyond our control — such as religion, fate, rearing, genetics or economic conditions that we live in — are acceptable. Reason only is the force of understanding reality. Ayn Rand and her thinking are uncompromising.

No person or organized institution has the right to seek value from any individual by physical force; and physical force against another is permissible only in self-defense.

Individuals can exchange value only in trade that is free and done by mutual consent.

“The only social system that bars physical force from human relationships is laissez-faire capitalism.” This is the only system that gives life to individual rights; and the only function of government is to protect individual rights.

“Statism — in fact and in principle — is nothing more than gang rule.”

Her ideal of “objectivism” rejects the so-called “mixed-economy” and rejects any regulation of or any redistribution of wealth in the economy. Government should not even collect taxes. People of means, she says, will make the contributions needed to support any needed limited government. (Alan Greenspan had some difficulties with this concept.)

She writes much more, but for our purposes this is enough to examine the usefulness (or lack thereof) of objectivism in our society today.

In keeping with the Rand philosophy, it is not difficult to understand Grover Norquist’s position on raising no taxes, or the expressed arguments opposing public safety nets for the poor, aged and persons who face unfortunate calamities such as the loss of everything in a fire or a storm.

Ayn Rand argues that there is no place for altruism in the ideal society she would create and predicts will be established.

In an Ayn Rand system of society every activity except government capabilities for protecting the individual from criminals, foreign invaders, and the settlement of disputes, would be private.

There would be no public education, libraries, medical research, scientific research, weather forecasting, social security, medicare or assistance to those facing natural calamities such as storms, floods or lightning-started fires.

Everyone would create his or her own security and happiness and would only be protected by government from criminals and foreign invaders.

It is even argued that there would be no depressions, recessions or corruption in the business community. Natural reality fully understood by man would serve all mankind — she proclaimed.

Several who broke relations or receded from Ayn Rand over time realized the unrealistic idealism of her philosophy — including Alan Greenspan, who receded.

Paul Ryan’s thoughts reflected in his budget, which Mitt Romney has stated is “marvelous,” suggest that he has not discovered the idealistic fallacies of Ayn Rand, though he has rejected her atheism.

Attempts to put her ideal system in place, in my judgment, could lead to the demise of the middle class and the establishment of a plutocratic dictatorship.

It could result in much human misery and disaster for our great nation.

Our constitutional democratic system has its faults and failures, but it reflects the realities of a complex society, made up of many different and valuable communities, who seek equality of opportunity, justice and human compassion.

Let’s be truly realistic and politically powerful, but compassionate and responsive to human needs, and work toward flexible and pragmatic democratic ideals!

Let’s not get lured away by the sirens of radical systems like historically the Russians, Chinese and Germans did.

HAROLD SARE is a regents service professor, emeritus, political science, at Oklahoma State University.

 

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

  • Remembering lessons from 1974

    This week marks the 40th anniversary of an important milestone in America’s constitutional history. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to order the Nixon White House to turn over audiotapes that would prove the president and his close aides were guilty of criminal violations. This ruling established with crystal clarity that the executive branch could not hide behind the shield of executive privilege to protect itself from the consequences of illegal behavior. It was a triumph for the continued vitality of our constitutional form of government.

    July 25, 2014

  • RedBlueAmerica: Is parenting being criminalized in America?

    Debra Harrell was arrested recently after the McDonald’s employee let her daughter spend the day playing in a nearby park while she worked her shift. The South Carolina woman says her daughter had a cell phone in case of danger, and critics say that children once were given the independence to spend a few unsupervised hours in a park.
    Is it a crime to parent “free-range” kids? Does Harrell deserve her problems? Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuk, the RedBlueAmerica columnists, debate the issue.

    July 24, 2014

  • Technology that will stimulate journalism’s future is now here

    To say technology has changed the newspaper media industry is understating the obvious. While much discussion focuses on how we read the news, technology is changing the way we report the news. The image of a reporter showing up to a scene with a pen and a pad is iconic but lost to the vestiges of time.
    I am asked frequently about the future of newspapers and, in particular, what does a successful future look like. For journalists, to be successful is to command multiple technologies and share news with readers in new and exciting ways.

    July 23, 2014

  • New Orleans features its own “Running of the Bulls”

    On July12, the streets of the Warehouse District of New Orleans were filled with thousands of young men who were seeking to avoid being hit with plastic bats wielded by women on roller skates as part of the annual “Running of the Bulls” that takes place in New Orleans.
    The event is based on the “Running of the Bulls” that occurs in Pamplona, Spain, that is  part of an annual occurrence in which a group of bulls rampage through the streets of Pamplona while men run from them to avoid being gored by their sharp horns. That event was introduced to the English-speaking world by Ernest Hemingway, who included scenes from it in his critically acclaimed 1926 novel “The Sun also Rises.”

    July 22, 2014

  • OTHER VIEW: Newsday: Lapses on deadly diseases demand explanation

    When we heard that the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had created a potentially lethal safety risk by improperly sending deadly pathogens — like anthrax — to other laboratories around the country, our first reaction was disbelief.

    July 22, 2014

  • Holding government accountable for open meeting violations

    A few weeks ago I wrote about the recent success of three important government transparency proposals which will go into law this year.

    July 21, 2014

  • GUEST OPINION — Oklahoma GOP voters want educational choices

    A Braun Research survey released in January showed that Oklahoma voters — Republicans, Democrats, and Independents alike — favor parental choice in education.

    July 21, 2014

  • HEY HINK: IRS interferes with citizens’ rights of free speech

    The patient is gravely ill. We have detected traces of a deadly venom in the bloodstream. We don’t know how widespread the poison is, but we know, if not counteracted, toxins of this kind can rot the patient’s vital organs and could ultimately prove fatal.

    July 19, 2014

Poll

If the Republican runoff for the 5th District congressional seat were today, which candidate would you vote for?

Patrice Douglas
Steve Russell
Undecided
     View Results