The Edmond Sun

Opinion

August 30, 2012

Ayn Rand: A force in the 2012 election?

STILLWATER — The selection of Paul Ryan as the Republican vice presidential candidate has brought to the surface the prominence of Ayn Rand as the idealist of a prominent group of U.S. political figures.

Ryan has remarked, “The reason I got involved in public service, by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, one person, it would be Ayn Rand. And the fight we are in here … is a fight between individualism versus collectivism.”

Interestingly, Alan Greenspan, our previous chairman of the Federal Reserve System, wrote in his recent book “Ayn Rand became a stabilizing force in my life. … By the time … Nixon campaigned for the presidency in 1968 … I had decided to … advance free-market capitalism as an insider, rather than as a critical pamphleteer.”

Ayn Rand literally stood beside him as he took the oath of office as chairman of the Nixon Council of Economic Advisors. Ayn Rand was his model. Greenspan was one of the leaders who led the movement to deregulate banks and other businesses, and thus contributed to our present recession.

And apparently, according to his 2009 public statements, Ayn Rand is Paul Ryan’s idealist mentor for shaping public policy. It has become rather common knowledge that Grover Norquist, the pusher of no tax increase pledges in Congress, is committed to the same idealist philosopher.

And it is obvious that the so-called Tea Party, supporting Paul Ryan, is inspired by the Ayn Rand idealism. Other national figures who are devotees of Ayn Rand include Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, Congressman Ron Paul of Texas and his son, Sen. Rand Paul of Tennessee.

History is replete with idealist philosophers promoting revolution in politics and government. Everyone is acquainted with Karl Marx’s lengthy and rambling writings that Lenin and Stalin of Russia and Mao of China were guided by in establishing new political and economic systems.

Marx even predicted the fading of government organization, as his ideals came into play. However, in both Russia and China, cruel, vicious political systems came into existence that destroyed millions of lives and imposed hardships on the general population.

Or, one can reflect on the Nazi system in Germany based on Mein Kampf, or the Fascist system in Italy. Attempts at putting idealist systems in place have been very costly, even deadly, to general populations.

Are we facing another idealist effort that could be extremely costly to the general population of the United States? Let’s examine the Ayn Rand idealist philosophy that through her writings and organized efforts have influenced a large number of Americans.

Ayn Rand was not a communist, nor was she a fascist. Her writings, which have been prominent since 1943, are still popular — unusually so.

Rand migrated to the U.S. from the Soviet Union in 1926, after graduating from the University of Petrograd, where she studied philosophy and history. She had witnessed the terrible violence and disarray of the Communist revolution in Russia, and her parents had lost their business.

Early in her life she decided to be a philosopher and author. She became quite accomplished writing fiction (Fountainhead, 1943, and Atlas Shrugged, 1957) philosophical works in the 1930s and after.

She died in 1982, but her works are very much alive in promoting her philosophy of objectivism.

Rand’s concept of reality is that it “exists independent of man’s consciousness, independent of any observer’s knowledge, beliefs, feeling, desires or fears. This means … that facts are facts …and that the task of man’s consciousness is to perceive reality, not to create or invent it.”

Objectivism does not permit man to believe in any supernatural being or to create his own reality. Officials of Paul Ryan’s church have scolded him for placing a greater emphasis on the teachings of Ayn Rand than on the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Rand argues that man is rational and is fully capable of understanding reality. “… the choice that controls all the choices you make and determines your life and character” is determined by reason.

No other forces considered beyond our control — such as religion, fate, rearing, genetics or economic conditions that we live in — are acceptable. Reason only is the force of understanding reality. Ayn Rand and her thinking are uncompromising.

No person or organized institution has the right to seek value from any individual by physical force; and physical force against another is permissible only in self-defense.

Individuals can exchange value only in trade that is free and done by mutual consent.

“The only social system that bars physical force from human relationships is laissez-faire capitalism.” This is the only system that gives life to individual rights; and the only function of government is to protect individual rights.

“Statism — in fact and in principle — is nothing more than gang rule.”

Her ideal of “objectivism” rejects the so-called “mixed-economy” and rejects any regulation of or any redistribution of wealth in the economy. Government should not even collect taxes. People of means, she says, will make the contributions needed to support any needed limited government. (Alan Greenspan had some difficulties with this concept.)

She writes much more, but for our purposes this is enough to examine the usefulness (or lack thereof) of objectivism in our society today.

In keeping with the Rand philosophy, it is not difficult to understand Grover Norquist’s position on raising no taxes, or the expressed arguments opposing public safety nets for the poor, aged and persons who face unfortunate calamities such as the loss of everything in a fire or a storm.

Ayn Rand argues that there is no place for altruism in the ideal society she would create and predicts will be established.

In an Ayn Rand system of society every activity except government capabilities for protecting the individual from criminals, foreign invaders, and the settlement of disputes, would be private.

There would be no public education, libraries, medical research, scientific research, weather forecasting, social security, medicare or assistance to those facing natural calamities such as storms, floods or lightning-started fires.

Everyone would create his or her own security and happiness and would only be protected by government from criminals and foreign invaders.

It is even argued that there would be no depressions, recessions or corruption in the business community. Natural reality fully understood by man would serve all mankind — she proclaimed.

Several who broke relations or receded from Ayn Rand over time realized the unrealistic idealism of her philosophy — including Alan Greenspan, who receded.

Paul Ryan’s thoughts reflected in his budget, which Mitt Romney has stated is “marvelous,” suggest that he has not discovered the idealistic fallacies of Ayn Rand, though he has rejected her atheism.

Attempts to put her ideal system in place, in my judgment, could lead to the demise of the middle class and the establishment of a plutocratic dictatorship.

It could result in much human misery and disaster for our great nation.

Our constitutional democratic system has its faults and failures, but it reflects the realities of a complex society, made up of many different and valuable communities, who seek equality of opportunity, justice and human compassion.

Let’s be truly realistic and politically powerful, but compassionate and responsive to human needs, and work toward flexible and pragmatic democratic ideals!

Let’s not get lured away by the sirens of radical systems like historically the Russians, Chinese and Germans did.

HAROLD SARE is a regents service professor, emeritus, political science, at Oklahoma State University.

 

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Free trade on steroids: The threat of the Trans-Pacific Partnership

    Many supporters of the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, trade agreement are arguing that its fate rests on President Obama’s bilateral talks with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in Japan this week. If Japan and the United States can sort out market access issues for agriculture and automobiles, the wisdom goes, this huge deal — in effect, a North American Free Trade Agreement on steroids — can at last be concluded.

    April 22, 2014

  • Can Hillary Clinton rock the cradle and the world?

    What's most interesting to contemplate is the effect becoming a grandmother will have on Hillary's ambition. It's one of life's unfairnesses that a woman's peak career years often coincide with her peak childbearing years.

    April 22, 2014

  • Chicago Tribune: If Walgreen Co. moves its HQ to Europe, blame Washington’s tax failure

    The Walgreen Co. drugstore chain got its start nearly a century ago in downstate Dixon, Ill., before moving its corporate headquarters to Chicago and eventually to north suburban Deerfield, Ill.
    Next stop? Could be Bern, Switzerland.
    A group of shareholders reportedly is pressuring the giant retail chain for a move to the land of cuckoo clocks. The reason: lower taxes. Much lower taxes.
    If Walgreen changes its legal domicile to Switzerland, where it recently acquired a stake in European drugstore chain Alliance Boots, the company could save big bucks on its corporate income-tax bill. The effective U.S. income-tax rate for Walgreen, according to analysts at Swiss Bank UBS: 37 percent. For Alliance Boots: about 20 percent.

    April 21, 2014

  • Sulphur a future major tourist destination?

    Greta Garbo says, “I want to be alone,” in the 1932 film “Grand Hotel.” That MGM film starred Garbo, John and Lionel Barrymore, Wallace Beery and a young actress from Lawton named Joan Crawford. It told the stories of several different people who were staying at an exclusive hotel of that name in Berlin Germany.
    It was critically well received and it inspired more recent films such as “Gosford Park” and television shows such as “Downton Abbey” in that it detailed the relationship between powerful and wealthy people and those who served them. The film opened amidst much fanfare and it received the Oscar for best picture in the year of its release.

    April 21, 2014

  • St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Why poverty across the world matters to Americans

    A child starving in South Sudan should matter to Americans. That was the message delivered last week by Nancy Lindborg, whose job at the U.S. Agency for International Development is to lead a federal bureau spreading democracy and humanitarian assistance across the world.
    That world has reached a critical danger zone, with three high-level crises combining military conflict with humanitarian catastrophes affecting millions of innocents in Syria, the South Sudan and the Central African Republic.
    But back to that child.

    April 18, 2014

  • Government leadership complicit in overfilling prisons

    One of the thorniest problems facing any society is the question of what to do with transgressors. Obviously, the more complicated a culture becomes, the more factors come into play in trying to figure out what to do with those who choose not to “play by the rules.”

    April 18, 2014

  • My best days are ones normal people take for granted

    It is a weekend for working around the house. My fiancee, Erin, and I have the baby’s room to paint and some IKEA furniture to assemble. I roll out of bed early — 10:30 — and get into my wheelchair. Erin is already making coffee in the kitchen.
    “I started the first wall,” she says. “I love that gray.” Erin never bugs me about sleeping late. For a few months after I was injured in the Boston Marathon bombings, I often slept 15 hours a day. The doctors said my body needed to heal. It must still be healing because I hardly ever see 8 a.m. anymore.

    April 18, 2014

  • Instead of mothballing Navy ships, give them to our allies

    A bitter debate has raged in the Pentagon for several months about the wisdom of taking the nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington out of service to save money. The Washington, at 24 years old a relatively young vessel, is due for a costly refit, a routine procedure that all of the 11 large carriers in service undergo regularly.

    April 18, 2014

  • The pessimist’s guide to grizzly bears and Earth Day

    This coming Friday, to “celebrate Earth Day,” the Walt Disney Co. will release one of those cutesy, fun-for-all-ages, nature documentaries. “Bears” is about grizzly bears.
    The trailer says, “From DisneyNature comes a story that all parents share. About the love, the joy, the struggle and the strength it takes to raise a family.”
    Talk about your misguided “Hollywood values.” I previously have acknowledged a morbid, unreasonable fear of grizzly bears, stemming from a youth misspent reading grisly grizzly-attack articles in Readers Digest. This fear is only morbid and unreasonable because I live about 1,500 miles from the nearest wild grizzly bear. Still. ...

    April 16, 2014

  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

Poll

Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

Agree
Disagree
Undecided
     View Results