The Edmond Sun


October 19, 2012

President’s words far from plain

EDMOND — As I watched the recent presidential debate, a quote by Thomas Fuller, a 17th century English writer, came to mind. To paraphrase: “Plain speaking is a jewel, but they that wear it are out of fashion.” Things haven’t changed much in the past 400 years, have they? I suppose we might amend Fuller’s statement: Those who wear the jewel of plain speaking aren’t just out of fashion, they’re invisible.

Today, the virtue of plain speaking often gives way to the oily concept of plausible deniability. Most of the doubletalk, hyperbole and hogwash we hear is irritating but harmless. No matter how much hot air any candidate gives out, we know that actions speak louder than words. We’re better off making our choices based on the candidate’s record rather than the promises.

The election ordeal would simplify if plain speech went hand-in-hand with a history of accomplishment. But today we must recognize that “spin” is a distasteful fact of modern political life. Candidates running on sorry records can’t win unless the other guy’s record is sorrier or unless they manufacture some razzle-dazzle and make us believe this mess is a “silk purse.”

But there are situations where we must not tolerate verbal trickery. There are times when our public servants have two options and two options only: Tell us the truth or keep your mouth shut. There are times when the American people have the right to expect and demand plain speaking.

We know, of course, there are situations where it’s OK to withhold facts. We accept this. When someone is injured or killed, we know identities will be withheld until the family can be notified. We understand the good sense and decency of this policy. We know information is sometimes withheld because disclosure would compromise an investigation, national security or some other important interest. Fine. If we’re kept in the dark for good reasons, just tell us.

What we can’t abide — what we should never allow — is a maze of misdirection and word games when someone has a duty to tell us the plain truth. It’s better to tell us nothing than play tricky shell games.

So here’s what I’m leading up to. How hard is it to say: My fellow Americans, I know you have many questions about the circumstances surrounding the death of our ambassador in Libya. We are gathering information and, once we have a clearer picture of what happened, we will answer as many questions as we can. In the meantime, please be patient as we work to get to the bottom of this. Or this: It’s too early to be certain, but preliminary intelligence suggests the attack on our embassy and the death of our ambassador are products of a terrorist attack. We will provide more information as it becomes available and verifiable.

Instead, what we got was a thoroughly misleading series of party-line misdirections about spontaneous out-of-control spinoffs from demonstrations provoked by obscure video. The maddening thing about this is the fact it was known to be poppycock for the bulk of the time it was being handed out.

We might be inclined to put the blame on the president’s subordinates. Maybe the nameless “intelligence community” falsified reports. Maybe they sent confusing reports. Maybe some functionaries at the State Department distorted and falsified the facts for reasons of their own. Maybe the president was taken off guard with the rest of us when the truth came out.

But the president, during the most recent debate, suggested that he told us from the Rose Garden on the day after the attack that it was an act of terrorism. The debate moderator backed him up on this. If that’s what the president meant to say in the Rose Garden, it’s buried in the verbiage of his remarks. If he meant to inform us that the attack on our embassy and the death of our ambassador were the result of a terrorist attack, he left the American people to wonder and guess at his meaning.

If we give the president the benefit of the doubt; if he knew the day after the attack that it was an act of terrorism and if he intended to tell us that, what are we left with? The president is a poor communicator. The administration’s internal lines of communication are pathetic. And the administration’s ability to discern and correct gross errors is ridiculously slow.

We are reminded of Abraham Lincoln’s illustration: “If you call a tail a leg how many legs does a horse have? Four, because calling a tail a leg doesn’t make a leg.” I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is an Edmond resident and retired attorney.

Text Only
  • Film critic Turan produces book

    Kenneth Turan, who is the film critic for National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition,” has written a book “Not to be Missed, Fifty-Four Favorites from a Life Time of Film.” His list of movies span the gamut from the beginnings of filmmaking through the present day.
    There are some surprising omissions on his list. While he includes two films, “A Touch of Evil” and Chimes at Midnight” made by Orson Welles, and one, “The Third Man,” that Welles starred in but did not direct. He did not however, include “Citizen Kane,” that was the first movie Welles made, that is  often cited by both film critics and historians as a favorite film.

    July 28, 2014

  • Logan County’s disputed zone

    Watchers of “Star Trek” may recall the episode from the original series entitled, “Day of the Dove.” In this episode, Captain Kirk and his crew are forced by a series of circumstances into a confrontation with the Klingons. The conflict eventually resolves after Kirk realizes that the circumstances have been intentionally designed by an alien force which feeds off negative emotions, especially fear and anger. Kirk and his crew communicate this fact to the Klingons and the conflict subsides. No longer feeding upon confrontation, the alien force is weakened and successfully driven away.

    July 28, 2014

  • Russell leads in Sun poll

    Polling results of an unscientific poll at show that Steve Russell, GOP candidate for the 5th District congressional seat, is in the lead with 57 percent of the vote ahead of the Aug. 26 runoff election. Thirty readers participated in the online poll.

    July 28, 2014

  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

  • Remembering lessons from 1974

    This week marks the 40th anniversary of an important milestone in America’s constitutional history. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to order the Nixon White House to turn over audiotapes that would prove the president and his close aides were guilty of criminal violations. This ruling established with crystal clarity that the executive branch could not hide behind the shield of executive privilege to protect itself from the consequences of illegal behavior. It was a triumph for the continued vitality of our constitutional form of government.

    July 25, 2014

  • RedBlueAmerica: Is parenting being criminalized in America?

    Debra Harrell was arrested recently after the McDonald’s employee let her daughter spend the day playing in a nearby park while she worked her shift. The South Carolina woman says her daughter had a cell phone in case of danger, and critics say that children once were given the independence to spend a few unsupervised hours in a park.
    Is it a crime to parent “free-range” kids? Does Harrell deserve her problems? Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuk, the RedBlueAmerica columnists, debate the issue.

    July 24, 2014

  • Technology that will stimulate journalism’s future is now here

    To say technology has changed the newspaper media industry is understating the obvious. While much discussion focuses on how we read the news, technology is changing the way we report the news. The image of a reporter showing up to a scene with a pen and a pad is iconic but lost to the vestiges of time.
    I am asked frequently about the future of newspapers and, in particular, what does a successful future look like. For journalists, to be successful is to command multiple technologies and share news with readers in new and exciting ways.

    July 23, 2014

  • New Orleans features its own “Running of the Bulls”

    On July12, the streets of the Warehouse District of New Orleans were filled with thousands of young men who were seeking to avoid being hit with plastic bats wielded by women on roller skates as part of the annual “Running of the Bulls” that takes place in New Orleans.
    The event is based on the “Running of the Bulls” that occurs in Pamplona, Spain, that is  part of an annual occurrence in which a group of bulls rampage through the streets of Pamplona while men run from them to avoid being gored by their sharp horns. That event was introduced to the English-speaking world by Ernest Hemingway, who included scenes from it in his critically acclaimed 1926 novel “The Sun also Rises.”

    July 22, 2014

  • OTHER VIEW: Newsday: Lapses on deadly diseases demand explanation

    When we heard that the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had created a potentially lethal safety risk by improperly sending deadly pathogens — like anthrax — to other laboratories around the country, our first reaction was disbelief.

    July 22, 2014


If the Republican runoff for the 5th District congressional seat were today, which candidate would you vote for?

Patrice Douglas
Steve Russell
     View Results