The Edmond Sun


February 22, 2013

A paternalistic government leads us down wrong path

EDMOND — An article in the March 7 issue of The New York Review of Books has me remembering a story about Confucius. According to legend, the great Chinese philosopher/teacher was traveling through a remote area with a group of students. At an out-of-the-way village, they came upon an old woman sitting by a grave grieving.

When Confucius inquired about her troubles, she said this was the grave of her only son who was killed by a tiger. The same predator had killed her husband and her husband’s father. “Why do you live in such a savage place?” “Because we may contend with vicious tigers, but the rulers leave us in peace.” Hearing this, Confucius turned to his followers: “This is an important lesson. Suffering from oppressive government is a worse fate than confronting savage tigers.”

Cass Sunstein, until recently President Obama’s administrator of the Office on Information and Regulatory Affairs, reviewed a book called “Against Autonomy” by Sarah Conley, assistant professor of philosophy at Bowdoin College. The title of Sunstein’s review is “For Your Own Good.”

Before we consider Professor Conley’s book, however, a word about Sunstein. He is a prolific and respected writer and a proponent of a theory called “libertarian paternalism,” which holds that government should, under certain circumstances, constrict individual choices when people are unlikely to make the correct choices for themselves. Sunstein believes the president, not the federal courts, should interpret the meaning of federal statute. He believes we should “celebrate tax day” because “In what sense is the money in our pockets and bank accounts fully ours?”

He urges a ban on government-sanctioned marriage. “Under our proposal, the word marriage would no longer appear in any laws and marriage licenses would no longer be offered or recognized by any level of government.”

Sunstein’s notions about individual freedom, government checks and balances and the institution of marriage, right or wrong, depart considerably from traditional American attitudes on these subjects.

I point this out because Sunstein seems to be largely in agreement with the main thesis of Professor Conley’s book: We’re too fat, too much in debt and save too little for the future. Therefore government coercion should not be ruled out in these areas. “… Autonomy is not valuable enough to offset what we lose by leaving people to their autonomous choices.” According to Sunstein and Conley, here are some reasons “the governed” are in need of greater involvement by paternalistic government.

According to these authors, average people have a “present bias” meaning they aren’t prone to weigh long-term benefits in connection with decision-making. They are also prone to “heuristic” thinking, meaning they take unreliable shortcuts in evaluating probabilities. “If people have recently suffered damage from a hurricane — they might well overestimate the risk. If they can recall few or no examples, they might well underestimate risk.” Furthermore “… most people are unrealistically optimistic in the sense that their own predictions about their behavior and their prospects are skewed in the optimistic direction.” Bottom line: “… outsiders may be in a much better position to know the probabilities than the people who are making choices themselves.”

Presumably, a junta of scientists, sociologists, social planners, politicians and bureaucrats taking account of the weaknesses of common thinking and the important social goals which, in the opinion of the junta, are better for us all, should coercively trump inconvenient individual choices

These notions, sincere as they may be, would be laughable if they weren’t so dangerous. If history teaches us anything about government, it’s this: Government is never satisfied. It never has enough power, money, information or predictable obedience. Every step we take in the direction of increased government ability to coercively limit our choices is a prelude to the next step and the next. And government abhors loosening its grip once it gets its regulatory fingers around the individual throat.

If thinkers like Sunstein and Conley carry the day, we’ll all end up like zoo animals. All our housing will be provided. Our health care will be provided. Our diets will be carefully monitored. All we lose is the freedom to make choices for ourselves. Personally, I prefer that rulers leave us alone and let us figure out how we choose to contend with wild tigers.

And by the way, Professor Conley’s next book is “One: Do We Have the Right to Have More Children?” In which she states “…the right to have a family doesn’t entail the right to have as many children as you want.” Presumably that choice too should be left to the government. Well, I dunno. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is an Edmond resident and retired attorney.

Text Only
  • St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Why poverty across the world matters to Americans

    A child starving in South Sudan should matter to Americans. That was the message delivered last week by Nancy Lindborg, whose job at the U.S. Agency for International Development is to lead a federal bureau spreading democracy and humanitarian assistance across the world.
    That world has reached a critical danger zone, with three high-level crises combining military conflict with humanitarian catastrophes affecting millions of innocents in Syria, the South Sudan and the Central African Republic.
    But back to that child.

    April 18, 2014

  • Government leadership complicit in overfilling prisons

    One of the thorniest problems facing any society is the question of what to do with transgressors. Obviously, the more complicated a culture becomes, the more factors come into play in trying to figure out what to do with those who choose not to “play by the rules.”

    April 18, 2014

  • My best days are ones normal people take for granted

    It is a weekend for working around the house. My fiancee, Erin, and I have the baby’s room to paint and some IKEA furniture to assemble. I roll out of bed early — 10:30 — and get into my wheelchair. Erin is already making coffee in the kitchen.
    “I started the first wall,” she says. “I love that gray.” Erin never bugs me about sleeping late. For a few months after I was injured in the Boston Marathon bombings, I often slept 15 hours a day. The doctors said my body needed to heal. It must still be healing because I hardly ever see 8 a.m. anymore.

    April 18, 2014

  • Instead of mothballing Navy ships, give them to our allies

    A bitter debate has raged in the Pentagon for several months about the wisdom of taking the nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington out of service to save money. The Washington, at 24 years old a relatively young vessel, is due for a costly refit, a routine procedure that all of the 11 large carriers in service undergo regularly.

    April 18, 2014

  • The pessimist’s guide to grizzly bears and Earth Day

    This coming Friday, to “celebrate Earth Day,” the Walt Disney Co. will release one of those cutesy, fun-for-all-ages, nature documentaries. “Bears” is about grizzly bears.
    The trailer says, “From DisneyNature comes a story that all parents share. About the love, the joy, the struggle and the strength it takes to raise a family.”
    Talk about your misguided “Hollywood values.” I previously have acknowledged a morbid, unreasonable fear of grizzly bears, stemming from a youth misspent reading grisly grizzly-attack articles in Readers Digest. This fear is only morbid and unreasonable because I live about 1,500 miles from the nearest wild grizzly bear. Still. ...

    April 16, 2014

  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

  • Los Angeles Times: Congress extend jobless benefits again

    How’s this for irony: Having allowed federal unemployment benefits to run out in December, some lawmakers are balking at a bill to renew them retroactively because it might be hard to figure out who should receive them. Congress made this task far harder than it should have been, but the technical challenges aren’t insurmountable. Lawmakers should restore the benefits now and leave them in place until the unemployment rate reaches a more reasonable level.

    April 14, 2014

  • Many nations invested in Israel

    Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yoram Ettinger recently spoke to a gathering at the Chabad Center for Jewish Life and Learning in Oklahoma City. The event began with a presentation by Rabbi Ovadia Goldman, who told the attendee that the  upcoming Jewish holiday of Passover was an occasion for them to embrace the children of God, which is all of humanity.

    April 14, 2014

  • Coming soon: More ways to get to know your doctor

    Last week, the federal government released a massive database capable of providing patients with much more information about their doctors.
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government agency that runs Medicare, is posting on its website detailed information about how many visits and procedures individual health professionals billed the program for in 2012, and how much they were paid.
    This new trove of data, which covers 880,000 health professionals, adds to a growing body of information available to patients who don’t want to leave choosing a doctor to chance. But to put that information to good use, consumers need to be aware of what is available, what’s missing and how to interpret it.

    April 14, 2014

  • HEY HINK: Hateful bullies attempt to muffle free speech

    Hopefully we agree it should be a fundamental right to voice criticism of any religion you wish. And you should have the right to sing the praises of any religion you choose. If criticism of religion is unjust, feel free to make your best argument to prove it. If criticism is just, don’t be afraid to acknowledge and embrace it. If songs of praise are merited, feel free to join in. If not, feel free to ignore them. But no American should participate in curbing free speech just because expression of religious views makes someone uncomfortable.

    April 11, 2014


Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

     View Results