The Edmond Sun


August 24, 2012

How can civilized societies define punishment?

EDMOND — A trio of items in the news this week raises an interesting question: What does society hope to accomplish by inflicting punishment on criminals? Let’s take a look.

Item 1: Pakistani authorities arrested a girl who, according to some reports, is as young as 11 years old and may suffer from some developmental disorder, possibly Down’s syndrome. She is accused of committing the crime of blasphemy for desecrating the Koran. Guilt, in her case, may lead to a life sentence. Authorities reportedly took her parents into “protective custody” after an angry mob threatened violence against the child, her Christian family and other Christian families living in the neighborhood. Question: What good purpose is served by punishing this child for blasphemy?

Item 2: Gary Haugen is on Oregon’s death row. In 1981, he murdered his girlfriend’s mother and, while in prison for that crime, he participated in the murder of another inmate for which he was convicted and sentenced to death. Gov. John Kitzhaber, a vocal critic of the death penalty, granted a blanket reprieve to all death penalty prisoners confined in Oregon. Haugen said, “Thanks but no thanks” and went to court to secure a ruling that he could drop all appeals and reject the reprieve and go forward with his execution. Earlier this month, a senior circuit judge held that Haugen cannot be legally forced to accept the reprieve. He can reject the governor’s offer of clemency and have his execution by lethal objection carried out. Once these court proceedings are concluded, a hearing will be scheduled to set Haugen’s execution date. Question: What good purpose is served by putting Haugen to death?

Item 3: Researchers from the University of Utah submitted a survey to 281 judges in 19 states seeking to determine the role brain pathology plays on the severity of criminal sentencing. The results are published in the latest issue of the journal Science. According to the analysis of these completed surveys, American judges are likely to be more lenient on criminals whose violent behavior is shown to result in whole or in part from some brain abnormality as demonstrated on an MRI scan. Question: What good purpose is served by moderating the sentences of those whose brain abnormalities interfere with their abilities to make choices?

In the case of the disabled Pakistani girl, we can say, no matter how we may feel about blasphemy laws, infliction of severe punishment on children for religious offenses cannot be justified. No civilized theory of crime and punishment can countenance the imposition of massive penalties on children — especially children who, for whatever reason, cannot fully appreciate the gravity of the offenses they are accused of committing.

In the case of the tendency of American jurists to be lenient with those suffering from brain pathology, we have a natural tendency to make allowances. No one wants to inflict punishment on those who lack the normal capability to make intelligent choices. But we must be mindful of those who seek to exploit this natural tendency to be lenient. Lately, we have seen resourceful lawyers advance such theories of defense as, “My client is not responsible because she was under the influence of a package of sugar rich Twinkies.” Before we allow our penal system to be manipulated by ever more colorful appeals to the unusual constraints on normal behavior, we must be sure the underlying science is sound. It’s one thing to be soft-hearted and another to be soft-headed.

In the case of Gary Haugen, there is a growing worldwide chorus of social critics who claim the imposition of the death penalty, in all cases, is barbaric. Amnesty International announced the launching of a movement to eliminate capital punishment around the world in 2013. There are potent arguments on either side of the capital punishment argument. Those in favor point to the Haugen case and say, “All other considerations aside, once the death sentence is carried out, Gary Haugen will never take another life.” On the other hand, opponents say “Imposition of the death penalty makes the state, itself, a murderer.” No matter which side of the capital punishment argument you find yourself on, you must admit that Mr. Haugen has the right to decide for himself whether he will accept an unwanted reprieve.

Each of these three news items raises controversial issues concerning the rational role of punishment in civilized society. It’s good, in reflecting on these issues, to keep in mind a quote by Albert Einstein: “If people are good only because they fear punishment and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.” I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is an Edmond resident and retired attorney.

Text Only
  • Film critic Turan produces book

    Kenneth Turan, who is the film critic for National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition,” has written a book “Not to be Missed, Fifty-Four Favorites from a Life Time of Film.” His list of movies span the gamut from the beginnings of filmmaking through the present day.
    There are some surprising omissions on his list. While he includes two films, “A Touch of Evil” and Chimes at Midnight” made by Orson Welles, and one, “The Third Man,” that Welles starred in but did not direct. He did not however, include “Citizen Kane,” that was the first movie Welles made, that is  often cited by both film critics and historians as a favorite film.

    July 28, 2014

  • Logan County’s disputed zone

    Watchers of “Star Trek” may recall the episode from the original series entitled, “Day of the Dove.” In this episode, Captain Kirk and his crew are forced by a series of circumstances into a confrontation with the Klingons. The conflict eventually resolves after Kirk realizes that the circumstances have been intentionally designed by an alien force which feeds off negative emotions, especially fear and anger. Kirk and his crew communicate this fact to the Klingons and the conflict subsides. No longer feeding upon confrontation, the alien force is weakened and successfully driven away.

    July 28, 2014

  • Russell leads in Sun poll

    Polling results of an unscientific poll at show that Steve Russell, GOP candidate for the 5th District congressional seat, is in the lead with 57 percent of the vote ahead of the Aug. 26 runoff election. Thirty readers participated in the online poll.

    July 28, 2014

  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

  • Remembering lessons from 1974

    This week marks the 40th anniversary of an important milestone in America’s constitutional history. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to order the Nixon White House to turn over audiotapes that would prove the president and his close aides were guilty of criminal violations. This ruling established with crystal clarity that the executive branch could not hide behind the shield of executive privilege to protect itself from the consequences of illegal behavior. It was a triumph for the continued vitality of our constitutional form of government.

    July 25, 2014

  • RedBlueAmerica: Is parenting being criminalized in America?

    Debra Harrell was arrested recently after the McDonald’s employee let her daughter spend the day playing in a nearby park while she worked her shift. The South Carolina woman says her daughter had a cell phone in case of danger, and critics say that children once were given the independence to spend a few unsupervised hours in a park.
    Is it a crime to parent “free-range” kids? Does Harrell deserve her problems? Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuk, the RedBlueAmerica columnists, debate the issue.

    July 24, 2014

  • Technology that will stimulate journalism’s future is now here

    To say technology has changed the newspaper media industry is understating the obvious. While much discussion focuses on how we read the news, technology is changing the way we report the news. The image of a reporter showing up to a scene with a pen and a pad is iconic but lost to the vestiges of time.
    I am asked frequently about the future of newspapers and, in particular, what does a successful future look like. For journalists, to be successful is to command multiple technologies and share news with readers in new and exciting ways.

    July 23, 2014

  • New Orleans features its own “Running of the Bulls”

    On July12, the streets of the Warehouse District of New Orleans were filled with thousands of young men who were seeking to avoid being hit with plastic bats wielded by women on roller skates as part of the annual “Running of the Bulls” that takes place in New Orleans.
    The event is based on the “Running of the Bulls” that occurs in Pamplona, Spain, that is  part of an annual occurrence in which a group of bulls rampage through the streets of Pamplona while men run from them to avoid being gored by their sharp horns. That event was introduced to the English-speaking world by Ernest Hemingway, who included scenes from it in his critically acclaimed 1926 novel “The Sun also Rises.”

    July 22, 2014

  • OTHER VIEW: Newsday: Lapses on deadly diseases demand explanation

    When we heard that the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had created a potentially lethal safety risk by improperly sending deadly pathogens — like anthrax — to other laboratories around the country, our first reaction was disbelief.

    July 22, 2014


If the Republican runoff for the 5th District congressional seat were today, which candidate would you vote for?

Patrice Douglas
Steve Russell
     View Results