The Edmond Sun

Opinion

November 22, 2013

HEY HINK: Nuclear option stinks of political hypocrisy

EDMOND — On Feb. 12, 2003, Miguel Estrada became the first federal judicial nominee whose appointment was derailed by a filibuster in the Senate. His nomination was opposed by a group of Senate Democrats determined to obstruct as many of President Bush’s appointments as possible. This first defeat by filibuster was proof of the effectiveness of this Democratic campaign.

Statistics indicate during President Bush’s first term, 67 percent of his Court of Appeals nominees were confirmed where President Reagan’s success rate was 85 percent and President Clinton’s was 71 percent during their first terms.

At that time, Republicans held a majority in the Senate. In a show of frustration over this obstruction, Republicans floated the idea of implementing the so-called “nuclear option.” This procedural maneuver would bring presidential appointments up for a vote on the strength of a simple majority rather than the 60 votes required by long-standing cloture rules.

Had the nuclear option been employed, President Bush and the Republican majority would have been able to ram the president’s nominations down the minority’s throat without offering meaningful opportunity for reasonable compromise. But leaders drew back from introducing this level of raw spiteful partisan payback, which would certainly leave hateful footprints on all future administrations. Rather than resort to this cynical alteration of 200 years of revered senatorial practice, the parties got together and worked out a compromise.

This Thursday, Senate Democrats, frustrated by Republican efforts to obstruct President Obama’s appointments, pulled that trigger and voted to impose the nuclear option. Majority Leader Harry Reid and Obama were both outspoken opponents of the nuclear option when it threatened to curtail Democratic obstructionism. Even so, both these men made separate appearances before television cameras justifying use of the nuclear option now that it suits their purposes. In their words, this departure from centuries of senatorial practice is required by necessity. To paraphrase the words of an esteemed British statesman, necessity is the stated justification for every infringement of human freedom. Necessity is always the argument of tyrants.

For the moment, let’s leave aside any discussion of rank hypocrisy. The vile nature of politicians cynically condemning a form of behavior when it interferes with their desires and worshipping that same behavior when it gets them what they want speaks for itself.

But let’s talk about the melting away of public trust. Today, this country is reeling under the weight of the most onerous legislative regime ever imposed on American citizens. A Democratic majority swept aside all calls for caution and imposed, on an unwilling public, a massive bill heavily freighted with incomprehensible provisions that hardly anyone claims to understand. Every day, Americans are shocked by news that there are unintended consequences orbiting abound this bill that threaten to impact their day-to-day health care decisions in unwelcome and mostly negative ways.

Every new financial analysis discloses that the ultimate costs to the nation are going to exceed all former expectations. The health care savings that American families were told they might expect are proving to be an illusion. The repeated promises of the president and his legislative allies that people could keep their health care plans is now shown to be an outright falsehood. At a time when millions of American families are carefully monitoring how every household dollar is spent, hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars are being flushed down the drains of technological incompetence.

Again and again when Americans turn to their president for answers to disturbing questions, they are met with shrugs of executive shoulders and given answers like: I didn’t know; I just read it in the paper like you did; No one told me; I’m unaware; No one’s more surprised than I am. I’ll get to the bottom of this; Someone will be held accountable. Meanwhile, there are no answers, there are no firings or demotions, there are no satisfactory explanations and apologies are constantly followed by maddening, implausible excuses.

At a time when Americans desperately want someone to hit the proverbial “reset” button and start leading for a change, they see, instead, an unprecedented partisan game of “gotcha.” Unfortunately, the reverberations from this will send shocks into future administrations and these won’t do anything to promote the people’s business. It will, regrettably, start a new round of “Pay back is hell.”

Eric Hoffer once observed, “The benevolent despot who sees himself as a shepherd of the people still demands from others the submissiveness of sheep.” Because the president and the Senate majority can’t find a way to use the tools at hand to devise a compromise, they will demand that all political opponents simply submit. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Free trade on steroids: The threat of the Trans-Pacific Partnership

    Many supporters of the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, trade agreement are arguing that its fate rests on President Obama’s bilateral talks with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in Japan this week. If Japan and the United States can sort out market access issues for agriculture and automobiles, the wisdom goes, this huge deal — in effect, a North American Free Trade Agreement on steroids — can at last be concluded.

    April 22, 2014

  • Can Hillary Clinton rock the cradle and the world?

    What's most interesting to contemplate is the effect becoming a grandmother will have on Hillary's ambition. It's one of life's unfairnesses that a woman's peak career years often coincide with her peak childbearing years.

    April 22, 2014

  • Chicago Tribune: If Walgreen Co. moves its HQ to Europe, blame Washington’s tax failure

    The Walgreen Co. drugstore chain got its start nearly a century ago in downstate Dixon, Ill., before moving its corporate headquarters to Chicago and eventually to north suburban Deerfield, Ill.
    Next stop? Could be Bern, Switzerland.
    A group of shareholders reportedly is pressuring the giant retail chain for a move to the land of cuckoo clocks. The reason: lower taxes. Much lower taxes.
    If Walgreen changes its legal domicile to Switzerland, where it recently acquired a stake in European drugstore chain Alliance Boots, the company could save big bucks on its corporate income-tax bill. The effective U.S. income-tax rate for Walgreen, according to analysts at Swiss Bank UBS: 37 percent. For Alliance Boots: about 20 percent.

    April 21, 2014

  • Sulphur a future major tourist destination?

    Greta Garbo says, “I want to be alone,” in the 1932 film “Grand Hotel.” That MGM film starred Garbo, John and Lionel Barrymore, Wallace Beery and a young actress from Lawton named Joan Crawford. It told the stories of several different people who were staying at an exclusive hotel of that name in Berlin Germany.
    It was critically well received and it inspired more recent films such as “Gosford Park” and television shows such as “Downton Abbey” in that it detailed the relationship between powerful and wealthy people and those who served them. The film opened amidst much fanfare and it received the Oscar for best picture in the year of its release.

    April 21, 2014

  • St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Why poverty across the world matters to Americans

    A child starving in South Sudan should matter to Americans. That was the message delivered last week by Nancy Lindborg, whose job at the U.S. Agency for International Development is to lead a federal bureau spreading democracy and humanitarian assistance across the world.
    That world has reached a critical danger zone, with three high-level crises combining military conflict with humanitarian catastrophes affecting millions of innocents in Syria, the South Sudan and the Central African Republic.
    But back to that child.

    April 18, 2014

  • Government leadership complicit in overfilling prisons

    One of the thorniest problems facing any society is the question of what to do with transgressors. Obviously, the more complicated a culture becomes, the more factors come into play in trying to figure out what to do with those who choose not to “play by the rules.”

    April 18, 2014

  • My best days are ones normal people take for granted

    It is a weekend for working around the house. My fiancee, Erin, and I have the baby’s room to paint and some IKEA furniture to assemble. I roll out of bed early — 10:30 — and get into my wheelchair. Erin is already making coffee in the kitchen.
    “I started the first wall,” she says. “I love that gray.” Erin never bugs me about sleeping late. For a few months after I was injured in the Boston Marathon bombings, I often slept 15 hours a day. The doctors said my body needed to heal. It must still be healing because I hardly ever see 8 a.m. anymore.

    April 18, 2014

  • Instead of mothballing Navy ships, give them to our allies

    A bitter debate has raged in the Pentagon for several months about the wisdom of taking the nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington out of service to save money. The Washington, at 24 years old a relatively young vessel, is due for a costly refit, a routine procedure that all of the 11 large carriers in service undergo regularly.

    April 18, 2014

  • The pessimist’s guide to grizzly bears and Earth Day

    This coming Friday, to “celebrate Earth Day,” the Walt Disney Co. will release one of those cutesy, fun-for-all-ages, nature documentaries. “Bears” is about grizzly bears.
    The trailer says, “From DisneyNature comes a story that all parents share. About the love, the joy, the struggle and the strength it takes to raise a family.”
    Talk about your misguided “Hollywood values.” I previously have acknowledged a morbid, unreasonable fear of grizzly bears, stemming from a youth misspent reading grisly grizzly-attack articles in Readers Digest. This fear is only morbid and unreasonable because I live about 1,500 miles from the nearest wild grizzly bear. Still. ...

    April 16, 2014

  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

Poll

Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

Agree
Disagree
Undecided
     View Results