The Edmond Sun


July 12, 2013

HEY HINK: Racial bias has no place in courtrooms

EDMOND — This week marks the 53rd anniversary of the publication of Harper Lee’s masterpiece “To Kill a Mockingbird.” Some people regard this book as one of the most important literary treatments of racial issues ever written. In light of some unpleasant racial dynamics coursing through America’s social bloodstream, it might be good to revisit this groundbreaking novel.

We all remember the story. Tom Robinson, a black man, is accused of committing a violent attack on a white woman. As soon as the allegation becomes public, a prejudiced segment of society pronounces Tom guilty. Those so eager to convict have no interest in hearing Tom’s side of the story. To their biased minds, he is condemned simply because he is black and the victim is white.

These people see no need to wait for a trial. They had no interest in hearing the evidence. No matter how persuasive the facts, no matter how obvious the truth, they won’t be shaken from their self-righteous certainty that the white victim must be believed and the black defendant must be guilty.

To their shallow minds, they are justified in ignoring the safeguards of the law. They decide to lynch Tom without wasting time hearing the facts or allowing the judicial system to take its course. Tom’s life is saved — temporarily — when the lynch mob, “through the mouth of babes” is brought face-to-face with the sorry nature of its cowardly behavior.

But Tom’s ordeal doesn’t end when the lynch mob disbands. At his trial, any fair-minded person hearing the evidence would certainly conclude the state hadn’t and couldn’t establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. But the burden of proof is no obstacle to racial bigots. They hear only what they want to hear. The only evidence they credit is evidence that conforms to their preconceived notion that Tom is guilty. They seize on testimony that is inherently unbelievable offered by witnesses who are patently unreliable and biased. They are blind and deaf to anything that points to Tom’s innocence.

In the end, an innocent man is found guilty, not because he committed the crime, but because he is the victim of racially biased public opinion.

Harper Lee intends for the reader to be outraged and heartbroken at the terrible injustice of a life destroyed when racial prejudice predetermines outcome and blinds people to the truth. Any fair-minded person who reads this book must surely agree that racial bias — of any kind — has no legitimate place in rendering conclusions on matters of guilt or innocence. It would be just as wrong for a white defendant to be convicted because of his race as it was to convict Tom Robinson because of his.

Make no mistake. Those bigots who were so quick to cry out for Tom Robinson’s blood were convinced they were right. This is the disgusting nature of prejudice. It is blind to its own inherent evil.

Many of the most outspoken racists on the American scene today would deny the fact that they are racist. They are so busy pointing out the biased motes in the eyes of others, that they can’t see the racial beams in their own.

Those racists who are willing to acknowledge the fact to justify their prejudice by making arguments that fall under the rubric of “two wrongs make a right.” In other words, because a segment of society was racist and committed wrongful acts, it’s OK to use race as a bludgeon to punish their descendants. But racial justification for punishing others is wrong — no matter whom the punisher is.

I couldn’t help but think of To Kill a Mockingbird as I observed the emotional maelstrom sweeping George Zimmerman toward judgment. There is an aggressive and vocal segment of society that reached a judgment on Zimmerman’s guilt on the strength of race alone. These people would accept nothing short of a murder charge without regard to the underlying facts.

At trial, it is obvious that many observers are totally oblivious to any evidence tending to prove Mr. Zimmerman’s innocence. They are so emotionally invested in seeing him convicted that they refuse to see and hear any fact inconsistent with that outcome.

It would be a sad day in America if law enforcement officers, judges and juries become the hostages of racial prejudice. Bigotry triumphs when law officers fear to do the right thing because of a potential racial backlash. Prejudice is exalted when judges make or withhold rulings in court with an eye toward racial responses outside the courtroom. Injustice is the victor when a jury cannot acquit because racial bias stands in the way. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

Text Only
  • Instead of mothballing Navy ships, give them to our allies

    A bitter debate has raged in the Pentagon for several months about the wisdom of taking the nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington out of service to save money. The Washington, at 24 years old a relatively young vessel, is due for a costly refit, a routine procedure that all of the 11 large carriers in service undergo regularly.

    April 18, 2014

  • The pessimist’s guide to grizzly bears and Earth Day

    This coming Friday, to “celebrate Earth Day,” the Walt Disney Co. will release one of those cutesy, fun-for-all-ages, nature documentaries. “Bears” is about grizzly bears.
    The trailer says, “From DisneyNature comes a story that all parents share. About the love, the joy, the struggle and the strength it takes to raise a family.”
    Talk about your misguided “Hollywood values.” I previously have acknowledged a morbid, unreasonable fear of grizzly bears, stemming from a youth misspent reading grisly grizzly-attack articles in Readers Digest. This fear is only morbid and unreasonable because I live about 1,500 miles from the nearest wild grizzly bear. Still. ...

    April 16, 2014

  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

  • Los Angeles Times: Congress extend jobless benefits again

    How’s this for irony: Having allowed federal unemployment benefits to run out in December, some lawmakers are balking at a bill to renew them retroactively because it might be hard to figure out who should receive them. Congress made this task far harder than it should have been, but the technical challenges aren’t insurmountable. Lawmakers should restore the benefits now and leave them in place until the unemployment rate reaches a more reasonable level.

    April 14, 2014

  • Many nations invested in Israel

    Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yoram Ettinger recently spoke to a gathering at the Chabad Center for Jewish Life and Learning in Oklahoma City. The event began with a presentation by Rabbi Ovadia Goldman, who told the attendee that the  upcoming Jewish holiday of Passover was an occasion for them to embrace the children of God, which is all of humanity.

    April 14, 2014

  • Coming soon: More ways to get to know your doctor

    Last week, the federal government released a massive database capable of providing patients with much more information about their doctors.
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government agency that runs Medicare, is posting on its website detailed information about how many visits and procedures individual health professionals billed the program for in 2012, and how much they were paid.
    This new trove of data, which covers 880,000 health professionals, adds to a growing body of information available to patients who don’t want to leave choosing a doctor to chance. But to put that information to good use, consumers need to be aware of what is available, what’s missing and how to interpret it.

    April 14, 2014

  • HEY HINK: Hateful bullies attempt to muffle free speech

    Hopefully we agree it should be a fundamental right to voice criticism of any religion you wish. And you should have the right to sing the praises of any religion you choose. If criticism of religion is unjust, feel free to make your best argument to prove it. If criticism is just, don’t be afraid to acknowledge and embrace it. If songs of praise are merited, feel free to join in. If not, feel free to ignore them. But no American should participate in curbing free speech just because expression of religious views makes someone uncomfortable.

    April 11, 2014

  • Putting Oklahoma parents in charge

    Oklahoma’s public schools serve many children very well. Still, for various reasons, some students’ needs are better met in private schools, in virtual schools or elsewhere. That is why two state lawmakers have introduced legislation to give parents debit cards, literally, to shop for the educational services that work best for their children.

    April 11, 2014

  • Israelis, Palestinians are losing their chance

    Developments in the Middle East suggest that prospects of success for the Israeli-Palestinian talks, to which Secretary of State John Kerry has devoted countless hours and trips, are weakening.

    April 11, 2014

  • Teens might trade naked selfies for mugshots

    Will teenagers ever learn? You think yours will. Maybe so. But it's likely that was also the hope of the parents of children who were so shamed by nude photos of themselves that went south - how else can they go - that they killed themselves.

    April 11, 2014


Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

     View Results