The Edmond Sun


May 2, 2013

Austerity, like supply side, is a scam

CNHI News Service — Used to be, economists knew that the way to growth was through robust economic activity: corporations would invest in their long-term economic health by hiring workers with good wages and producing goods everyone could buy and use.

It was more than an economic theory. All economists had to do was look at American communities and watch them  work. Things began changing in the 1970s and took a radical turn in the 1980s with supply-side economics, which said that money should be funneled to the rich, primarily through tax cuts, and they would use their wealth to create new businesses and jobs.

Their largesse would trickle down to everyone.

What should have been discredited from the beginning based on the fundamental nature of capitalism, took hold because it made the rich a lot richer. But a funny thing happened. The rich kept their money, moved production overseas, cut jobs and closed factories. They figured that if politicians were dumb enough to let them, they’d take everything in sight and give nothing back. That’s been the dominant economic policy of conservatives for the past generation. Texas Gov. Rick Perry said during the presidential campaign that supply side being the only economic system that worked was a settled matter.

When George W. Bush was appointed president, he inherited a large surplus, which he promptly plunged into a deep deficit. No conservatives, even economists, decried the deficit in those years, but they’ve been relentless in criticizing President Obama about runaway government spending. Republicans have spent the last four years arguing for spending cuts that will hurt the poor and tax cuts that will enable the rich.

This process, called austerity, has grown up in stark contrast to the liberals’ preferred method of boosting the economy: stimulus, not cuts, along the lines Keynes outlined.

In 2010, conservatives got the intellectual boost they needed to say “game over” in favor of austerity. A report issued by two Harvard economists, Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff, argued that when debt rises to 90 percent of GDP, growth suffers. A recent study, however, from an economics team at the University of Massachusetts, trashes the Reinhart-Rogoff report by showing that it left out countries that experienced growth after debt reached 90 percent of GDP. The Reinhart-Rogoff report maintained a growth rate of -0.1 percent with 90 percent debt load. Put in the countries they left out of the mix and growth is 2.2 percent.

A report in the Wall Street Journal last week told of Europe slowly turning away from austerity in favor of stimulus. Why? Because austerity aggravates issues such as unemployment and putting food on the table.

Paul Krugman, in his April 26 New York Times column, had as good a takedown of Reinhart-Rogoff as has been written. The rich, he noted, know that austerity is leveled at the working classes and poor but won’t touch the wealthy. It’s top-down class warfare to slap on austerity measures on the working public already reeling by the supply-side money grab.

Krugman doesn’t get around to asking why. Why do the true believers on the right think austerity will work? The answer is they don’t or, if they do, they don’t care. If there are draconian spending cuts that will put new money in the market to enable debtors and investors to rake in more cash, conservatives are all for it. That’s why they favor privatizing Social Security and Medicare. This would pump billions into the great casino on Wall Street where the rich would go after it as if the USA turned the mint over to Dow Jones.

All conservative economic theories — austerity, supply side —  have to burst because their premises are based on a flaw: that the rich need more money so it can trickle down. After more than 30 years of this scam, you can look at American communities and see that it’s not working.

STEPHEN DICK is an editor at The Herald Bulletin in Anderson, Ind.  He can be reached at

Text Only
  • Is English getting dissed?

    Is the English language being massacred by the young, the linguistically untidy and anyone who uses the Internet? Absolutely.
    Is that anything new? Hardly.
    Many words and expressions in common parlance today would have raised the hackles of language scolds in the not-so-distant past. For evidence, let’s look at some examples from recent newspaper articles.

    July 31, 2014

  • 'Too big to fail' equals 'too eager to borrow'

    Four years ago this month, President Barack Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law, promising that the 848-page financial law would “put a stop to taxpayer bailouts once and for all,” he said. But recently, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren told a Detroit crowd that “the biggest banks are even bigger than they were when they got too big to fail in 2008.”
    Who’s right?

    July 30, 2014

  • Sheltons travel for better life for family

    Some time around 1865 a mixed-race African American couple, William and Mary Shelton, made their way from Mississippi to east Texas. Nothing is known for certain of their origins in he Magnolia state, or the circumstances under which they began their new lives in Texas.

    July 29, 2014

  • Film critic Turan produces book

    Kenneth Turan, who is the film critic for National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition,” has written a book “Not to be Missed, Fifty-Four Favorites from a Life Time of Film.” His list of movies span the gamut from the beginnings of filmmaking through the present day.
    There are some surprising omissions on his list. While he includes two films, “A Touch of Evil” and Chimes at Midnight” made by Orson Welles, and one, “The Third Man,” that Welles starred in but did not direct. He did not however, include “Citizen Kane,” that was the first movie Welles made, that is  often cited by both film critics and historians as a favorite film.

    July 28, 2014

  • Logan County’s disputed zone

    Watchers of “Star Trek” may recall the episode from the original series entitled, “Day of the Dove.” In this episode, Captain Kirk and his crew are forced by a series of circumstances into a confrontation with the Klingons. The conflict eventually resolves after Kirk realizes that the circumstances have been intentionally designed by an alien force which feeds off negative emotions, especially fear and anger. Kirk and his crew communicate this fact to the Klingons and the conflict subsides. No longer feeding upon confrontation, the alien force is weakened and successfully driven away.

    July 28, 2014

  • Russell leads in Sun poll

    Polling results of an unscientific poll at show that Steve Russell, GOP candidate for the 5th District congressional seat, is in the lead with 57 percent of the vote ahead of the Aug. 26 runoff election. Thirty readers participated in the online poll.

    July 28, 2014

  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

  • Remembering lessons from 1974

    This week marks the 40th anniversary of an important milestone in America’s constitutional history. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to order the Nixon White House to turn over audiotapes that would prove the president and his close aides were guilty of criminal violations. This ruling established with crystal clarity that the executive branch could not hide behind the shield of executive privilege to protect itself from the consequences of illegal behavior. It was a triumph for the continued vitality of our constitutional form of government.

    July 25, 2014

  • RedBlueAmerica: Is parenting being criminalized in America?

    Debra Harrell was arrested recently after the McDonald’s employee let her daughter spend the day playing in a nearby park while she worked her shift. The South Carolina woman says her daughter had a cell phone in case of danger, and critics say that children once were given the independence to spend a few unsupervised hours in a park.
    Is it a crime to parent “free-range” kids? Does Harrell deserve her problems? Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuk, the RedBlueAmerica columnists, debate the issue.

    July 24, 2014


The runoff race for the 5th District congressional seat is set for Aug. 26. If the voting were today, which candidate would you support?

Al McAffrey
Tom Guild
     View Results