The Edmond Sun

Opinion

April 15, 2014

Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

LOS ANGELES — Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.

The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

The answer to the first question may be debatable, but the second is not. We must have effective oversight of secret activities.

How did we fall into this quagmire and, more important, how do we get out?

After the 9/11 attacks, President George W. Bush correctly understood his responsibility: To do all he could to protect the nation from another attack. But his administration loosened us from our moorings by approving some aspects of the rendition and detention program, principally “enhanced interrogation techniques.” The CIA engaged in activity, such as waterboarding, that the U.S. had long regarded as torture. When details of the program were leaked, many Americans were repelled.

According to media accounts, the Senate report concludes that the program did not produce any significant intelligence and that CIA officers employed techniques more brutal than authorized and then misled their senior officers, who then misled Congress.

It is important to understand, as best we can, what happened. The CIA has said it agrees with a number of the findings but disagrees with others. The CIA should not hesitate to quickly declassify the Senate report, including details that are ugly or critical of the agency. As the report apparently contains graphic details, measures must be taken to protect Americans overseas from possible reaction to the document’s release.

When the dust settles, we are likely to conclude, as with President Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus and President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s internment of Japanese Americans, that we overreacted in a time of national emergency. We should commit to never do it again.

But it is not clear that another investigation of the program is warranted. The Justice Department and the CIA have investigated it several times and no criminal charges have resulted.

Moreover, CIA officers need to know that the limb will not be sawed off behind them if a program properly authorized by one administration and Congress is regarded as improper by a future administration or Congress. CIA officers must be held accountable for how they carry out the programs, but we should not criminalize activities that were properly authorized and executed.

And that brings us to the second question: Can Congress effectively oversee secret intelligence activities?

The Church and Pike congressional investigations of the mid-1970s led to a basic bargain that intelligence activities may be conducted under broad legislative authority provided that oversight committees are kept “fully and currently informed.” The committees are responsible for ensuring that intelligence activities are legal, consistent with our values and support policy objectives. Congress has placed its trust in these committees, and, by extension, so have the American people.

Oversight is crucial to the success of our intelligence activities. The CIA is often called on to undertake risky and potentially controversial missions. But no such mission can succeed if it is inconsistent with our basic values or not supported by the American people. That support results from candid discussion and debate in Congress. To ensure this support, intelligence agencies must be as open as possible with the committees. They must never lie to Congress.

Feinstein recently gave a blistering and very disturbing floor statement that accused the CIA of acting unconstitutionally by seeking to frustrate the committee’s investigation of the rendition and detention program. She was particularly angry about reports that the CIA referred actions by committee staff to the Justice Department as potential criminal violations.

There is a requirement for government agencies to report possible violations of law to the Justice Department. It may be that prudence called for informal discussions with Justice rather than a formal referral. It is Justice’s job, not the CIA’s, to consider issues of separation of powers and criminal prosecution.

This whole affair is now being investigated by the Justice Department and the Senate. Until we know the facts, I find it hard to believe that the CIA acted in bad faith or to intimidate the committee.

I am confident that Congress and the CIA want trust and regular order restored between the agency and the congressional committees. The nation faces critical security issues, and the sooner we can get the report released, the debate concluded and move on, the better.

JEFFREY H. SMITH was general counsel of the CIA from 1995 to 1996 and general counsel of the Senate Armed Services Committee from 1986 to 1988. He wrote this for the Los Angeles Times.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Film critic Turan produces book

    Kenneth Turan, who is the film critic for National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition,” has written a book “Not to be Missed, Fifty-Four Favorites from a Life Time of Film.” His list of movies span the gamut from the beginnings of filmmaking through the present day.
    There are some surprising omissions on his list. While he includes two films, “A Touch of Evil” and Chimes at Midnight” made by Orson Welles, and one, “The Third Man,” that Welles starred in but did not direct. He did not however, include “Citizen Kane,” that was the first movie Welles made, that is  often cited by both film critics and historians as a favorite film.

    July 28, 2014

  • Logan County’s disputed zone

    Watchers of “Star Trek” may recall the episode from the original series entitled, “Day of the Dove.” In this episode, Captain Kirk and his crew are forced by a series of circumstances into a confrontation with the Klingons. The conflict eventually resolves after Kirk realizes that the circumstances have been intentionally designed by an alien force which feeds off negative emotions, especially fear and anger. Kirk and his crew communicate this fact to the Klingons and the conflict subsides. No longer feeding upon confrontation, the alien force is weakened and successfully driven away.

    July 28, 2014

  • Russell leads in Sun poll

    Polling results of an unscientific poll at www.edmondsun.com show that Steve Russell, GOP candidate for the 5th District congressional seat, is in the lead with 57 percent of the vote ahead of the Aug. 26 runoff election. Thirty readers participated in the online poll.

    July 28, 2014

  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

  • Remembering lessons from 1974

    This week marks the 40th anniversary of an important milestone in America’s constitutional history. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to order the Nixon White House to turn over audiotapes that would prove the president and his close aides were guilty of criminal violations. This ruling established with crystal clarity that the executive branch could not hide behind the shield of executive privilege to protect itself from the consequences of illegal behavior. It was a triumph for the continued vitality of our constitutional form of government.

    July 25, 2014

  • RedBlueAmerica: Is parenting being criminalized in America?

    Debra Harrell was arrested recently after the McDonald’s employee let her daughter spend the day playing in a nearby park while she worked her shift. The South Carolina woman says her daughter had a cell phone in case of danger, and critics say that children once were given the independence to spend a few unsupervised hours in a park.
    Is it a crime to parent “free-range” kids? Does Harrell deserve her problems? Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuk, the RedBlueAmerica columnists, debate the issue.

    July 24, 2014

  • Technology that will stimulate journalism’s future is now here

    To say technology has changed the newspaper media industry is understating the obvious. While much discussion focuses on how we read the news, technology is changing the way we report the news. The image of a reporter showing up to a scene with a pen and a pad is iconic but lost to the vestiges of time.
    I am asked frequently about the future of newspapers and, in particular, what does a successful future look like. For journalists, to be successful is to command multiple technologies and share news with readers in new and exciting ways.

    July 23, 2014

  • New Orleans features its own “Running of the Bulls”

    On July12, the streets of the Warehouse District of New Orleans were filled with thousands of young men who were seeking to avoid being hit with plastic bats wielded by women on roller skates as part of the annual “Running of the Bulls” that takes place in New Orleans.
    The event is based on the “Running of the Bulls” that occurs in Pamplona, Spain, that is  part of an annual occurrence in which a group of bulls rampage through the streets of Pamplona while men run from them to avoid being gored by their sharp horns. That event was introduced to the English-speaking world by Ernest Hemingway, who included scenes from it in his critically acclaimed 1926 novel “The Sun also Rises.”

    July 22, 2014

  • OTHER VIEW: Newsday: Lapses on deadly diseases demand explanation

    When we heard that the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had created a potentially lethal safety risk by improperly sending deadly pathogens — like anthrax — to other laboratories around the country, our first reaction was disbelief.

    July 22, 2014

Poll

The runoff race for the 5th District congressional seat is set for Aug. 26. If the voting were today, which candidate would you support?

Al McAffrey
Tom Guild
Undecided
     View Results