The Edmond Sun

Opinion

November 16, 2012

THE ASTUTE INVESTOR: Looking for the smart money

EDMOND — Have you ever read an investment report that made reference to the “smart money?” You’ll hear comments how the “smart money” is going into certain stocks or market sectors. My favorite is “watch what the smart money is doing.”

Well, that sounds like good advice, but how do you know who is smart and who is not? More importantly, what is the standard for smart versus, well, not so smart? And where do you go to watch them? Maybe there is a look-out spot near Wall Street, or a favorite corner, where you can strategically place yourself for an afternoon of smart people watching. Perhaps it’s a lot like bird watching. Oh look! There’s one in a three-piece suit.

Usually it refers to what savvy corporate insiders, institutional investors, hedge-funds and other professional investors are doing at the time, in comparison to high or low levels of bullish investor sentiment. Unfortunately, the term “smart money” has led to increasing use of the term “dumb money” in some market writing, with the implication that non-professional investors must be dumb.

That is totally unfair and inaccurate. Individual investors are most definitely not dumb or stupid. That would be impossible just given the fact that they are able to be investors. Individual investors would have to be among the most intelligent, knowledgeable, successful people on the planet to have the success in their chosen careers that provide them with money that can be invested.

You don’t get to be a successful artist, attorney, doctor, engineer, scientist, business executive, salesperson, small business owner or whatever, by being anything but knowledgeable, intelligent and sometimes brilliant.

The term comes from the idea that the so-called “smart money” supposedly buys low, sells high and thrives from their investing. It also implies that most individual investors lose money over the long-term, or fail to match the gain they would make by simply leaving their money in the bank.

Numerous studies on the subject seem to verify this. Research firm Dalbar Inc. published a study in 2003 titled “Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behavior.” It showed that from 1984-2002 the average annual return on equities was 9.3 percent, while the average annual return of individual investors who invested in those equities was only 2.6 percent over the same period.

A similar Dalbar Inc. study of bond investors in 2006 showed that over the 20-year period from 1986-2005, the Long-Term Government Bond Index had an average annual return of 9.7 percent but the average annual return of individual bond investors was just 1.8 percent.

So what seems to be the problem for obviously intelligent and smart individual investors? According to other studies, the very fact that they are smart, knowledgeable, intelligent and successful — in whatever is their own field of expertise — may be the problem, as it may cultivate over-confidence when they step into money-management, a field that is not their area of expertise.

For instance, a survey by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation in 2001 revealed that 85 percent of U.S. individual investors were unable to pass a simple five-question investment “survival” quiz. In 2009, the Investor Education Foundation of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority conducted a similar investor survey. Sixty-seven percent of respondents rated their own financial knowledge not just average but high. Yet by far the majority failed FINRA’s test of their knowledge of even the most basic of financial questions.

In 2012, the Securities & Exchange Commission published a report on financial literacy among non-professional investors. Its conclusion was that “U.S. investors lack basic financial literacy, and have a weak grasp of even elementary financial concepts.” Yet the majority rated their financial knowledge as high.

It’s obviously a potential problem for investing success when those suffering the consequences don’t even realize they have a problem. Thus, many keep investing the same way in every cycle, making the same mistakes over and over, while expecting the results to be different. (As I recall, wasn’t that Einstein’s definition of insanity?)

Gerri Walsh, president of the FINRA Foundation says, “There are a lot of people who think they’re good at handling their money, but their results tell you otherwise. Those people are going to be particularly difficult to reach and educate because they don’t think they have a problem.”

The market is a great teacher, but its lessons are often not learned. If this describes you, perhaps you need to seek the assistance of a good financial adviser to help you.

SIPC Vice President Robert O’Hara said, “We’ve been at this for more than 50 years, and we see the same problem over and over again. Investors are enticed in during bull markets, but then don’t know what to do when things turn sour later. People need to take the time to learn the basics about investing, and how to put them into practice.”

It sounds like a reasonable suggestion given the statistics. In the meantime, who wants to join me for a little smart money watching? Maybe if we hide in the bushes we can see some walking by. Thanks for reading.

NICK MASSEY is a financial adviser and president of Householder Group Financial Advisors in Edmond. Massey can be reached at www.nickmassey.com. Securities offered through Securities Service Network Inc., member FINRA/SIPC.

 

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

  • Los Angeles Times: Congress extend jobless benefits again

    How’s this for irony: Having allowed federal unemployment benefits to run out in December, some lawmakers are balking at a bill to renew them retroactively because it might be hard to figure out who should receive them. Congress made this task far harder than it should have been, but the technical challenges aren’t insurmountable. Lawmakers should restore the benefits now and leave them in place until the unemployment rate reaches a more reasonable level.

    April 14, 2014

  • Many nations invested in Israel

    Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yoram Ettinger recently spoke to a gathering at the Chabad Center for Jewish Life and Learning in Oklahoma City. The event began with a presentation by Rabbi Ovadia Goldman, who told the attendee that the  upcoming Jewish holiday of Passover was an occasion for them to embrace the children of God, which is all of humanity.

    April 14, 2014

  • Coming soon: More ways to get to know your doctor

    Last week, the federal government released a massive database capable of providing patients with much more information about their doctors.
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government agency that runs Medicare, is posting on its website detailed information about how many visits and procedures individual health professionals billed the program for in 2012, and how much they were paid.
    This new trove of data, which covers 880,000 health professionals, adds to a growing body of information available to patients who don’t want to leave choosing a doctor to chance. But to put that information to good use, consumers need to be aware of what is available, what’s missing and how to interpret it.

    April 14, 2014

  • HEY HINK: Hateful bullies attempt to muffle free speech

    Hopefully we agree it should be a fundamental right to voice criticism of any religion you wish. And you should have the right to sing the praises of any religion you choose. If criticism of religion is unjust, feel free to make your best argument to prove it. If criticism is just, don’t be afraid to acknowledge and embrace it. If songs of praise are merited, feel free to join in. If not, feel free to ignore them. But no American should participate in curbing free speech just because expression of religious views makes someone uncomfortable.

    April 11, 2014

  • Putting Oklahoma parents in charge

    Oklahoma’s public schools serve many children very well. Still, for various reasons, some students’ needs are better met in private schools, in virtual schools or elsewhere. That is why two state lawmakers have introduced legislation to give parents debit cards, literally, to shop for the educational services that work best for their children.

    April 11, 2014

  • Israelis, Palestinians are losing their chance

    Developments in the Middle East suggest that prospects of success for the Israeli-Palestinian talks, to which Secretary of State John Kerry has devoted countless hours and trips, are weakening.

    April 11, 2014

  • Teens might trade naked selfies for mugshots

    Will teenagers ever learn? You think yours will. Maybe so. But it's likely that was also the hope of the parents of children who were so shamed by nude photos of themselves that went south - how else can they go - that they killed themselves.

    April 11, 2014

  • Tax deadline and no reform in sight

    The annual tax filing deadline, which comes next Tuesday, provides a good opportunity for tax reform advocates to decry the current law’s increasing complexity and inequities, and to urge enactment of a simpler, fairer system.

    April 10, 2014

  • To get quality care, it helps to be the right kind of patient

    I am a family physician. Sometimes I must step out of the comfort of my clinical role and into that of patient or family caregiver. Generally, these trips to the other side of the exam table inspire a fair amount of anxiety.

    April 8, 2014

Poll

Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

Agree
Disagree
Undecided
     View Results