Opinion
The case for educational choice scholarships
EDMOND — We like to have choices. We like to have options. Whether we are considering trivial items (think socks) or important ones (think doctors), we are happiest when we have the freedom to choose what we want. Yet, when it comes to one of the most important services any person will ever consume — one’s education — we artificially limit the number of choices from which parents can choose.
In the past few weeks nearly 700,000 Oklahoma schoolchildren have donned their new clothes, slung their backpacks over the shoulders and trudged back to school. More than 90 percent of those students will be attending their local public school. Unfortunately, this is not the result of parental choice as much as it is the result of governmental policy.
In Oklahoma a student’s school is not determined by the student’s needs or by the parent’s wishes. Instead, school enrollment is determined by two factors that should have no influence on this decision — wealth and location. Wealthy families are able to send their children to any school. Poor and middle-income families though, often have just one choice — their local public school.
In many cases that local public school will provide a quality education. However, providing a quality education for every child is not equivalent to providing the best education for every child. Admittedly, Oklahoma’s public schools often do a phenomenal job at fulfilling an impossible objective — they must educate every student that walks through their doors, regardless of student interest and parental support. Yet, because they must serve everyone, and because the population of Oklahoma schoolchildren is so diverse, it is impossible for the public school system to serve all of the needs of all of their students. For some students, private schools are better.
There are many reasons why parents might prefer a private school over a public one. First, some private schools might offer a more rigorous curriculum leading to higher levels of student achievement. Alternatively, some private schools might offer a different curriculum with a greater focus on the arts, or on science or even religious studies (more than 80 percent of private schools nationally have a religious affiliation). Finally, parents might prefer a private school because they believe it offers a better social setting for their children due to smaller class sizes, smaller schools or a more familial atmosphere. Clearly, private schools can better serve the needs of some students than can public schools.
Some try to dismiss such statements by labeling them as an attack on public schools and public school teachers. However, it is not an attack on (or even a criticism of) public schools and teachers to recognize that thousands of Oklahoma parents believe that a private school can better serve the needs of their children. After all, thousands of parents have already chosen a private school for their children. And thousands more would do so if they could afford it.
Thus, if we truly wanted to enact a policy that made it easier for every student to attend the best school — public or private — for them, then the government would start offering tuition scholarships to every K-12 student who enrolled in an accredited private school. At the federal level, a $3,000 tuition scholarship would cost less than $20 billion annually — less than what the government spends subsidizing millionaire farmers or spent this year on corporate bailouts. At the state level, a $3,000 tuition scholarship would cost only $100 million annually — less than 2 percent of the total state budget.
Such scholarship programs would make more educational choices more affordable for more Oklahoma families. Consequently, more Oklahoma families would be able to choose the school that they believe would best serve their children. In conclusion, this proposal would give Oklahoma’s parents more power. It would give Oklahoma’s parents more flexibility. It would give Oklahoma’s parents more happiness, all because it gives Oklahoma’s parents the freedom to choose.
MICKEY HEPNER is an associate professor of economics at the University of Central Oklahoma.
- Opinion
-
-
Edwards book missing some perspective
During his run for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination in 2008 John Edwards often spoke about the plight of the less fortunate in our society. At campaign events the former senator from North Carolina told of how American workers whose jobs had gone overseas as a result of globalization were unable to support their families and were now living in poverty.
-
Government purchasing process needs more transparency
In last week’s legislative update, I talked about how social media can be used as a feedback mechanism by businesses. I posited that state government should be allowed to take advantage of these same techniques, and I have heard from state officials how they need a clear set of policies to govern their actions in using social media projects.
-
Preparing for a Rainy Day
This year, Oklahoma faces one of the worst budget crises in our state’s history. The decisions that lie ahead for state leaders will be difficult, but I have no doubt that Oklahoma will weather this storm and emerge stronger.
-
HB 2914 could create jobs, expand economy
This last week the 2010 Legislative Session kicked off at the limestone palace on 23rd and Lincoln. While the Legislature will consider hundreds of bills in the next four months, there is one that is my favorite — HB 2914 by Rep. Danny Morgan.
-
Moving up in national testing scores
A long history of education reform is positively impacting our public schools, earning Oklahoma high marks on two recent national report cards. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s “Leaders and Laggards” national report card in late 2009 gave Oklahoma an “A” (second in the nation) for “Technology” for the use of Web-based programs and computer-based assessments, which was one of six categories graded. Our state received a “B” in the “Data” category for our state’s educational data system, ranking 11th in the nation.
-
Staying alive: The legacy of Will Rogers
Recently, I received an e-mail from a theatrical producer in Chicago. David happily shared with me the script of a new one-man show set to premiere at a theater in suburban Oakbrook in late March. Ticket sales are going great, he reported. People are excited, and two matinee performances are already sold out. The subject of the production just so happens to be a gum-chewing, lariat-tossing, wise and witty cowboy by the name of Will Rogers.
-
For Oklahoma: Less can really mean more
While Oklahoma digs out from massive winter storms the governor and Legislature are faced with digging Oklahoma out of a severe fiscal crisis.
The governor in his state message vowed to protect education and Oklahoma’s most vulnerable. This is an immediate challenge, but solutions must go beyond protection to implementation of long-term reforms for Oklahoma’s future. -
Cities attempt to eliminate accountability notices
Little things can make a big difference. Printed public notices in newspapers are little things, but they make a big difference when keeping government accountable to citizens and taxpayers.
It is no surprise the Oklahoma Municipal League has introduced legislative proposals to eliminate printed notices in newspapers. -
Brotherly love just as important as prayer
You hear a lot about prayer these days and it brings a story to mind. There are several versions of this old tale drifting around in different cultures but they all have the same basic outline.
A certain farmer found himself harvesting a crop that exceeded his wildest expectations. After years of living on the edge of poverty, his ship finally had come in and he was on the road to prosperity at last. -
Can the president reconnect with Americans?
You could tell President Obama’s State of the Union speech was shaped by public opinion polls. That’s not necessarily bad, especially when it comes to a presidency that has been veering off track, and losing key political battles.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Edwards book missing some perspective
