The Edmond Sun

Opinion

May 17, 2013

HEY HINK: Some people just are not cut out for command

EDMOND — Recent headlines cause me to remember an incident that occurred on an army base some years ago. Warning here: I’m taking some liberties with names and details, but the basic outline of events is accurate.

A certain company commander, let’s call him Captain Duntz, had command of a motor pool on a large army base in the continental U.S.

One night, a Battalion First Sgt. made a surprise inspection of Captain Duntz’s company and found the enlisted man assigned to fire watch, asleep at his post. Sometime later, a utility truck in the motor pool threw a rod because someone neglected to make routine checks on the vehicle’s oil levels. A scheduled inspection of the motor pool mess hall found gross breaches of Army regulations and the mess hall was alarmingly unsanitary. Battalion review disclosed that Captain Duntz’s company consistently ranked near the top in numbers of soldiers going AWOL.

In evaluation of overall Battalion proficiency, Captain Duntz’s motor pool ranked consistently near or at the bottom.

One afternoon, Captain Duntz was summoned to Battalion headquarters. After an exchange of salutes, the battalion commander asked, “Captain Duntz, what’s the problem with Company X?”

Captain Duntz launched into a litany of denials, complaints, justifications and excuses. Army regulations were unduly burdensome. He didn’t know regulations were being ignored. The enlisted men assigned to this company were duds. His NCO’s had it in for him. Battalion inspectors were unfair, eetc.

The Battalion Commander heard him out and then said, “Captain Duntz, let me clarify. When I asked ‘what’s the problem with Company X,’ I was really asking, who is in command of Company X?” Blushing, Captain Duntz muttered, “I am Sir.”

The Commanding Officer continued. “In case you didn’t know, let me tell you something about command. One of your main jobs as commander is to keep these problems off my desk. Army regulations may be burdensome, but it’s your duty to see they’re carried out. The men in your company may be duds, but command requires that you make do with the personnel assigned to you. If you’re NCO’s are incompetent or disloyal, it’s your job to find out why and fix the problem. As for the unfairness of Army inspectors, every military man from the top down has to take that into account and compensate for it. Captain Duntz, I might be inclined to overlook one or two of these problems — even three. But when my attention is called to a single commander this many times for this many reasons, I can only draw one conclusion. Captain Duntz, you are simply not cut out for command. You are dismissed.”

Let me tell you why Captain Duntz is on my mind. This country has been wracked by demoralizing, embarrassing and tragic scandals for several years now. We have seen the nation held up to ridicule when members of our Secret Service become embroiled in sleazy disputes with prostitutes. We’ve been outraged to find that representatives of our government actually have been proactive in placing firearms in the hands of ruthless murderers.

We have been heartbroken when an upstanding young officer is killed in the service of his country and the murder weapon may have been placed in the hands of the killer by our own government. We have grieved when four of our brave countrymen die at the hands of terrorists and we agonize over the possibility that they might have been saved with the exercise of decisive command. We are bewildered by the fact that their deaths are surrounded by a thick fog of misrepresentation and CYA doublespeak.

We are appalled by the fact that the Internal Revenue Service is exploiting its enormous power to decide which taxpayers will receive the benefits of the law and which taxpayers will be denied those benefits based solely on expressions of political opinion disapproved by “the Bureau.”

We are stunned to learn that federal enforcement officers have launched a fishing expedition against a respected news organization and its reporters justifying this behavior by asserting “It’s all in the interest of national security.”

We have, of course, heard the litany of denials, excuses and justifications. We, as citizens, have delegated command to the President. Whether you are Republican or Democrat, liberal or conservative, old, young, white, black, Latino, Native American, Asian — whatever — you have a right to expect the person in command to keep these types of problems out of our headlines. And by out of our headlines, I don’t mean buried. I’m remembering the words of our Battalion Commander. Some people are just not cut out for command. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

 

MIKE HINKLE is an Edmond resident and retired attorney.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Why poverty across the world matters to Americans

    A child starving in South Sudan should matter to Americans. That was the message delivered last week by Nancy Lindborg, whose job at the U.S. Agency for International Development is to lead a federal bureau spreading democracy and humanitarian assistance across the world.
    That world has reached a critical danger zone, with three high-level crises combining military conflict with humanitarian catastrophes affecting millions of innocents in Syria, the South Sudan and the Central African Republic.
    But back to that child.

    April 18, 2014

  • Government leadership complicit in overfilling prisons

    One of the thorniest problems facing any society is the question of what to do with transgressors. Obviously, the more complicated a culture becomes, the more factors come into play in trying to figure out what to do with those who choose not to “play by the rules.”

    April 18, 2014

  • My best days are ones normal people take for granted

    It is a weekend for working around the house. My fiancee, Erin, and I have the baby’s room to paint and some IKEA furniture to assemble. I roll out of bed early — 10:30 — and get into my wheelchair. Erin is already making coffee in the kitchen.
    “I started the first wall,” she says. “I love that gray.” Erin never bugs me about sleeping late. For a few months after I was injured in the Boston Marathon bombings, I often slept 15 hours a day. The doctors said my body needed to heal. It must still be healing because I hardly ever see 8 a.m. anymore.

    April 18, 2014

  • Instead of mothballing Navy ships, give them to our allies

    A bitter debate has raged in the Pentagon for several months about the wisdom of taking the nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington out of service to save money. The Washington, at 24 years old a relatively young vessel, is due for a costly refit, a routine procedure that all of the 11 large carriers in service undergo regularly.

    April 18, 2014

  • The pessimist’s guide to grizzly bears and Earth Day

    This coming Friday, to “celebrate Earth Day,” the Walt Disney Co. will release one of those cutesy, fun-for-all-ages, nature documentaries. “Bears” is about grizzly bears.
    The trailer says, “From DisneyNature comes a story that all parents share. About the love, the joy, the struggle and the strength it takes to raise a family.”
    Talk about your misguided “Hollywood values.” I previously have acknowledged a morbid, unreasonable fear of grizzly bears, stemming from a youth misspent reading grisly grizzly-attack articles in Readers Digest. This fear is only morbid and unreasonable because I live about 1,500 miles from the nearest wild grizzly bear. Still. ...

    April 16, 2014

  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

  • Los Angeles Times: Congress extend jobless benefits again

    How’s this for irony: Having allowed federal unemployment benefits to run out in December, some lawmakers are balking at a bill to renew them retroactively because it might be hard to figure out who should receive them. Congress made this task far harder than it should have been, but the technical challenges aren’t insurmountable. Lawmakers should restore the benefits now and leave them in place until the unemployment rate reaches a more reasonable level.

    April 14, 2014

  • Many nations invested in Israel

    Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yoram Ettinger recently spoke to a gathering at the Chabad Center for Jewish Life and Learning in Oklahoma City. The event began with a presentation by Rabbi Ovadia Goldman, who told the attendee that the  upcoming Jewish holiday of Passover was an occasion for them to embrace the children of God, which is all of humanity.

    April 14, 2014

  • Coming soon: More ways to get to know your doctor

    Last week, the federal government released a massive database capable of providing patients with much more information about their doctors.
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government agency that runs Medicare, is posting on its website detailed information about how many visits and procedures individual health professionals billed the program for in 2012, and how much they were paid.
    This new trove of data, which covers 880,000 health professionals, adds to a growing body of information available to patients who don’t want to leave choosing a doctor to chance. But to put that information to good use, consumers need to be aware of what is available, what’s missing and how to interpret it.

    April 14, 2014

  • HEY HINK: Hateful bullies attempt to muffle free speech

    Hopefully we agree it should be a fundamental right to voice criticism of any religion you wish. And you should have the right to sing the praises of any religion you choose. If criticism of religion is unjust, feel free to make your best argument to prove it. If criticism is just, don’t be afraid to acknowledge and embrace it. If songs of praise are merited, feel free to join in. If not, feel free to ignore them. But no American should participate in curbing free speech just because expression of religious views makes someone uncomfortable.

    April 11, 2014

Poll

Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

Agree
Disagree
Undecided
     View Results