EDMOND — Sometimes a single phone call can change your life. Whether it is an actress receiving a call telling her that she has been nominated for an Oscar, a student being told she has been accepted to Harvard or a ballplayer being called up to the big leagues, a single phone call can represent the culmination of a lifetime of hard work and big dreams. Such a phone call can confirm that you are one of the best.
Sadly though, many people will never receive such a call. After all, not everyone can be among the best. However, thanks to the voters in Oklahoma City last week, all Oklahomans soon might have a chance to experience the feeling such a call can bring.
On March 4, Oklahoma City voters overwhelmingly approved a 15-month extension of a penny sales tax that originally was enacted to fund the MAPS projects. The revenue from the extension will fund $121 million in improvements to the Ford Center in order to make the arena suitable for a viable NBA franchise.
Since the NBA will decide in the next few months whether to approve the move of the Seattle Supersonics basketball team to Oklahoma City, the March 4 vote (and the magnitude of the victory) only can reinforce to league officials the idea that Oklahoma City is ready for the NBA. Consequently, we soon can expect a call from league officials informing us that the NBA is ready for Oklahoma City, too.
While few Oklahomans object to the NBA coming to Oklahoma City, there are some who object to spending taxpayer dollars to make it happen. It is true that economists generally are leery about the idea of government subsidies supporting a business enterprise — economists typically prefer that market forces alone prevail. However, economists also recognize there is a justification for subsidizing businesses that provide benefits for society as a whole. Generally, economic research finds that arena subsidies do provide important benefits for cities trying to attract and retain professional sports teams.
Interestingly though, the benefits to cities are not in the form of tangible financial benefits, but in the intangible benefits like enhanced civic pride. It turns out that the direct financial benefits of stadium subsidies are quite small. Yes, with an NBA team people will spend money attending the games, buying merchandise and dining out before and after games. Yet this just means that people will spend less money elsewhere.
Even the $121 million in construction spending does little to stimulate the local economy. Yes, there will be an additional $121 million spent on construction, but that just means that taxpayers have $121 million less to spend elsewhere. The net effect of this spending on the city and state will be relatively small.
But economists long have recognized that non-financial benefits matter just as much as the financial ones. In fact, economic studies of similar decisions made in cities like Baltimore and Indianapolis find that the non-financial benefits of stadium subsidies far outweigh the direct financial benefits.
For Oklahoma, the situation is similar. Having an NBA team is our chance to show the world that we can compete with world-class cities like New York, Los Angeles, Chicago and Dallas. This is our chance to show everyone that Oklahoma is more than OK — and that is worth a lot.
Just like the day a ballplayer is first called to the big leagues is one of the most important days in his life, the day Oklahoma City is called to join the NBA will be one of the most important days in Oklahoma’s history. As a state we have shown that we can support an NBA team during the short-term. With the vote last week, Oklahoma showed we are willing to make the investment needed to support a team during the long-term as well. We have done all we can to show we are a big league city worthy of a big league team. Now all that is left, is to wait for the phone to ring.
MICKEY HEPNER is an associate professor of economics at the University of Central Oklahoma.
Opinion
Waiting for the phone to ring
- Opinion
-
-
OUR VIEW: Feb. 14 vote about ideas
If you read any of the letters to the editor in the past two weeks regarding Tuesday’s District 2 Edmond school board race, then you already know that this election is not about the individual candidates so much as it’s about what type of school board do Edmond residents really want governing their school district?
-
What are your presidential 10 Commandments?
As we brace for the upcoming presidential campaign, we should be honest about our responsibility in the process. Before we get pushed, pulled, bribed, frightened, bullied, flattered, fooled or charmed into voting for a candidate, let’s take a mature thoughtful look at what the profile of the president should look like. In order to do that, let’s do an exercise. Sit down with a pencil and paper and draft your proposal for the Ten Commandments to be obeyed by the president. Let me share some of my suggestions.
-
What would Reagan do today in Oklahoma?
As we celebrated the 101st anniversary of Ronald Reagan’s birth on Feb. 6, several of us at Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs started discussing what Reagan might do today. Here are some of the ideas we came up with.
- LETTER: School counselor says Roy ready to help all students
- LETTER: Supporter calls Duncan 'a firecracker'
-
Consequences of an overregulated nation
Overreaching government regulations are costing jobs and killing our economy. They are a heavy burden on our nation and its citizens — in some cases worse than our nation’s increasingly out-of-control debt.
-
LETTER: Supporter: Duncan shows passion for children’s needs
To the Editor:
The families in the Edmond Public School District are fortunate to have Kathleen Duncan as their advocate on the Edmond Board of Education. Duncan has worked tirelessly for the welfare and benefit of the Edmond schools’ students. -
LETTER: Teacher supports Duncan’s re-election
To the Editor:
On Feb. 14 patrons of District 2 have an opportunity to re-elect the current president of the Edmond School Board, Kathleen Duncan. Duncan has served as a board member for 10 years. When people move to the Oklahoma City area, they buy a home here because of the exceptional quality of Edmond Public Schools. This speaks to Duncan’s goal of “Excellence in Education for All Edmond Public School Students.” -
LETTER: Supporter: Duncan understands diverse issues
To the Editor:
Kathleen Duncan understands the diverse issues that effect our schools. She carefully studies the district’s issues and works tirelessly as an advocate for all students. Her votes as a board member have an impact for years to come and she takes that responsibility very seriously. - LETTER: Reader says incumbent's personal agenda in the way
- More Opinion Headlines
-
OUR VIEW: Feb. 14 vote about ideas
