The Edmond Sun

Opinion

August 26, 2008

Going green on the cheap

EDMOND — It used to be that when someone said they were green, they were admitting to being jealous. Now I proclaim that I’m not a bit jealous and I’m trying to be “green” but for a variety of reasons.

There’s an old saying that has been ascribed to American colonists that says, “Use it up, wear it out, make it do or do without.” Little girls might have embroidered samplers with these rugged ideals in the olden days, but now economists and credit counselors all across the country are urging us to reconsider our spending.

Environmentalists must call that attitude “green.” The less we buy, the less we waste. The less we buy the less packaging ends up in landfills. The less we buy, the more use we have from the stuff we already own. The less we buy, the fewer trips to the store we make in our fossil-fuel-slurping cars. The less we buy, the less we impact the planet.

In my deepest gut, I don’t think Americans are too worried about the amount of pollution their consumer habits cause, which is minuscule in comparison with other nations with horribly polluted air, water and landscape. Further, buying less is exactly the opposite of what “The Green Movement” really wants. I would love to hear some politician promote the idea of buying less to improve the environment. The Greenies would withdraw their support.

I humbly submit that businesses that use the environment as a hook are in business to make money like everybody else. They don’t want us to stay home and use what we already have, they want us to come to the store and buy large quantities of their products. That’s the unavoidable irony of the environmental business. The last thing in the world they want you to do is to stop shopping. They would convince you that you need their special equipment and additives to compost properly, when in truth, if you throw the garbage in a pile and add some grass, it’ll attract flies and other varmints and rot away into mother earth without any help from Al Gore.

I recently visited a health food store in search of bulk soy beans. I want to grind them up in my electric grinder and add them to baked goods to beef up the high-quality, low-cost protein and fiber in our diet. But they were so expensive, I would be better off buying filet mignon if I want high-quality, low-cost protein. I stared at the 1-pound package of little white beans wondering if Jack might have traded them for a cow and if I plant them, a beanstalk will bring me to a castle in the clouds.

If not magic, why were these ordinary beans so expensive? Then I noticed the word “organic” on the label and realized that the business wanted me to pay five times the cost of most beans because the farmer didn’t spend the extra money on pesticides to keep bugs out. He hauled manure from the cow pen and the chicken coop to fertilize his fields instead of buying it from the farm supply store. Since the word “organic” doesn’t require that my precious beans were hand picked, nor that the farmer hauled them to the market in a wheel barrow nor were they sold in a biodegradable sack, the only difference is the “green” effect on my psyche and the cash register.

The irony of the whole organic or green idea is that every farmer is motivated to take good care of his soil and control infestations with the least harm to his property. My research suggests that most agriculture would qualify under the legal definitions of “organic,” but the certification and verification process is so cumbersome that farmers serve Americans better by spending the certification money on bigger volumes at lower costs.

Another irony in the green movement is the idea of using corn oil produced fuels as “green” fuels. Corn is extremely hard on the soil and corn producers must amend the soil with additives and leave their fields fallow every few years to recover some of the nutrients stripped from the soil by the plant.

The bottom line of the “Green movement” is the bottom line. It’s a big, money-making business masquerading as our fairy godmother. I’m not buying. I’m going to impact the green in my wallet and the green planet by doing like the folks who built this nation did and make good use of the resources I have by buying less. It’s not my fault if I waste and pollute less along the way.

BETH STEPHENSON is an Edmond resident.

Text Only
Opinion
  • OUR VIEW: Feb. 14 vote about ideas

    If you read any of the letters to the editor in the past two weeks regarding Tuesday’s District 2 Edmond school board race, then you already know that this election is not about the individual candidates so much as it’s about what type of school board do Edmond residents really want governing their school district?

    February 11, 2012

  • What are your presidential 10 Commandments?

    As we brace for the upcoming presidential campaign, we should be honest about our responsibility in the process. Before we get pushed, pulled, bribed, frightened, bullied, flattered, fooled or charmed into voting for a candidate, let’s take a mature thoughtful look at what the profile of the president should look like. In order to do that, let’s do an exercise. Sit down with a pencil and paper and draft your proposal for the Ten Commandments to be obeyed by the president. Let me share some of my suggestions.

    February 11, 2012

  • What would Reagan do today in Oklahoma?

    As we celebrated the 101st anniversary of Ronald Reagan’s birth on Feb. 6, several of us at Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs started discussing what Reagan might do today. Here are some of the ideas we came up with.

    February 11, 2012

  • LETTER: School counselor says Roy ready to help all students

    February 9, 2012

  • LETTER: Supporter calls Duncan 'a firecracker'

    February 9, 2012

  • Consequences of an overregulated nation

    Overreaching government regulations are costing jobs and killing our economy. They are a heavy burden on our nation and its citizens — in some cases worse than our nation’s increasingly out-of-control debt.

    February 9, 2012

  • LETTER: Supporter: Duncan shows passion for children’s needs

    To the Editor:
    The families in the Edmond Public School District are fortunate to have Kathleen Duncan as their advocate on the Edmond Board of Education. Duncan has worked tirelessly for the welfare and benefit of the Edmond schools’ students.

    February 9, 2012

  • LETTER: Teacher supports Duncan’s re-election

    To the Editor:
    On Feb. 14 patrons of District 2 have an opportunity to re-elect the current president of the Edmond School Board, Kathleen Duncan. Duncan has served as a board member for 10 years. When people move to the Oklahoma City area, they buy a home here because of the exceptional quality of Edmond Public Schools. This speaks to Duncan’s goal of “Excellence in Education for All Edmond Public School Students.” 

    February 9, 2012

  • LETTER: Supporter: Duncan understands diverse issues

    To the Editor:
    Kathleen Duncan understands the diverse issues that effect our schools. She carefully studies the district’s issues and works tirelessly as an advocate for all students. Her votes as a board member have an impact for years to come and she takes that responsibility very seriously.

    February 9, 2012

  • LETTER: Reader says incumbent's personal agenda in the way

    February 8, 2012

Poll

Voters in the Edmond Public School District 2 will go to the polls from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Feb. 14 to decide between school board candidates Steve Roy and Kathleen Duncan. District 2 is roughly centered in northwest Edmond. Who will get your vote?

Steve Roy
Kathleen Duncan
     View Results