Opinion
Texas tort reform not so alluring
The allure of Texas to tort reform backers is unmistakable. It also has proved a red herring. You’ve probably read about how Proposition 12, Texas’ 10-gallon tort reform, has rejuvenated our neighbor’s health care system and made the state a haven for well-intentioned doctors fleeing runaway juries.
Too bad things aren’t that simple. Nothing gets in the way of a good tale like the truth.
“Five years later, the ($250,000) cap is being credited for slashing liability insurance premiums, boosting the ranks of doctors in the state, and improving medical access to patients,” the American Medical Association crowed last month (See “5 years of tort reform: Lone Star success story,” American Medical News, Sept. 15, 2008).
Yes, tort reform has brought doctors to Texas. They just haven’t flocked to areas that need them most, undercutting what was perhaps supporters’ strongest argument in favor of passing the constitutional amendment.
The Texas Observer chronicled the influx of doctors (See “Baby, I Lied,” Oct. 19, 2007) and made some disturbing findings.
Prior to Proposition 12’s passage 152 counties had no obstetrician. Four years later the number remained the same. Moreover, 49 percent of Texas counties had no obstetrician, neurosurgeon or orthopedic surgeon, and a number of counties had no physicians. “Proposition 12, and the far-reaching changes in Texas civil law that it dragged behind it, was built on a foundation of mistruths and sketchy assumptions. The number of doctors in the state was not falling, it was steadily rising,” the newspaper reported, citing Texas Medical Board data. “There was little statistical evidence showing that frivolous lawsuits were a significant force driving increases in malpractice premiums.
“The campaign’s promise, that tort reform would cause doctors to begin returning to the state’s sparsely populated regions, has now been tested for four years. It has not proven to be true,” the newspaper concluded.
A study in the recent issue of Health Affairs examined county-by-county data to determine how often doctors move, where they go and why they go there (See “The Diffusion Of Physicians,” September/October 2008).
“The overall tendency of movers was to go to places with lower physician-to-population ratios but higher per capita incomes and lower unemployment,” the authors wrote. “These trends, if they continue, may help decrease access to physician care in rural and urban underserved areas.”
Doctors, it turns out, move for many of the same reasons the rest of us move and choose many of the same places.
However, the most important factor in where physicians choose to practice, the authors found, is residency location.
Research shows Oklahoma doesn’t have a shortage of doctors, either.
The Journal Record newspaper (See “Is Oklahoma losing doctors?” April 3, 2008) found 4,787 medical doctors and 880 medical and osteopathic physicians, respectively, practiced in the state in 1997. By 2007 the numbers had risen to 5,718 and 1,324, respectively.
Oklahoma’s mid-2007 population estimate was 3,617,316, Census data show. Its mid-1997 population estimate was 3,372,900. This is a 7 percent increase.
The state’s doctor population grew by 24 percent during the same decade.
If improving access to health care is the goal, tort reform has failed to live up to its promise in the Lone Star State. That’s one distinction we should let Texas keep.
JEFF RAYMOND is executive director of the Oklahoma Foundation for Consumer & Patient Rights.
- Opinion
-
-
Free File Alliance benefits Oklahoma taxpayers
Earlier this month, I was pleased to help announce a program that will help many Oklahomans complete their state and federal income taxes and be sure they have claimed all the credits and exemptions for which they are eligible.
-
House video feed yields positive results
I have enjoyed observing the first signs of tangible impact from the recent decision by state House Speaker Chris Benge to provide a live video feed of House proceedings on the Internet.
When I served as a City Councilman in Guthrie, I made the observation that the city policymakers’ decision to televise City Council meetings had an impact on city policy. No longer could councilmen count on supporting bad policy with the knowledge that the public would be unable to see their actions in context. -
Hatred based on religion nothing new
The late Richard Hofstadter was a professor of American History at Columbia University in New York City. He also authored several books, one of which was titled “The Paranoid Style of American Politics.”
-
Ready, set, wait for grocery tax cut
This past week the Oklahoma State Senate approved a measure to eliminate the sales tax on groceries. However, you shouldn’t be counting all the money you will save just yet — unless you are already preparing your shopping list for 2016.
-
Spring break ideas for families
The old saying, “No matter how long the winter, spring is sure to follow” comes to mind this time of year. Robins are taking wing and the daffodils are starting to peek out of the ground.
For many boys and girls, the traditional “spring break” cannot come soon enough, and most Oklahoma schools will observe this time off between March 15 and March 19. However, some school boards do not schedule a spring break, and a few opt to schedule a one- or two-day break only. -
Daring to dream can bring fulfillment
The Everly Brothers sang, “All I have to do is dream.” Dreams are of pretty cool stuff but also about aspirations and hopes for a lifetime. Growing up we all have dreams we reach for. To some it’s in sports, others politics, others to be in the movies. We “dream” of what things will be like when we only get older.
-
Deficits have their dark sides
Once upon a time there was a deficit. By our standards, it wouldn’t amount to much, but in its day, it was big enough and unruly enough that it managed to set historical forces in motion and we’re still hearing echoes of that little deficit today.
Now this little deficit, like all deficits, didn’t have a name of its own. It was just called “deficit.” And, like many other deficits, it was cultivated, nourished and born with the idea it would serve a good purpose. This particular deficit was meant to cover a war. -
Resident offers health care rebuttal
Congressman Tom Cole continued the Republicans’ misleading depiction of the health insurance reform bill and congressional machinations related to it in his essay in Tuesday’s Edmond Sun. He included so many inaccuracies that it is hard to clarify everything.
He falsely called the proposal a “government takeover of health care.” Health care is delivered by providers. Under both the current system and the proposed revisions of the system, a consumer selects a provider based on whether or not there is a means to pay that particular provider. -
Partisan political tactics stifle health-care debate
The process Democrats are pursuing to pass government-run health care has become as flawed as the legislation itself. And that’s really saying something. From the beginning, the attempt to force through a government takeover of health care has been marked by disregard for the views of the American people. Now, Democratic leaders are disregarding standard legislative procedures and well-established precedents, as well.
-
South of border business deals could expand local economy
There is one of the original copies of the Magna Carta on display in the British Museum in London, England. That document, which was signed by King John of England in 1215 under duress, imposed limits on the power of the monarchy.
A copy of the Magna Carta, along with the American Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution and the Oklahoma Constitution are included in the volumes that contain the statutes enacted by the Oklahoma Legislature. Paragraph 41 of the Magna Carta mandated that “All merchants shall have safe and secure conduct, to go out of, and to come into England, and to stay there, and to pass as well by land and water, for buying and selling by the ancient and allowed customs, without any evil tolls.” - More Opinion Headlines
-
Free File Alliance benefits Oklahoma taxpayers
