EDMOND — In the past few months I’ve visited with thousands of Oklahomans who are concerned about how the health-care reform bills moving through Congress will affect their lives and their families’ lives. Politicians in Washington have talked a good game about pursuing common reform goals, such as reducing costs and improving access and quality. Unfortunately, the plan backed by congressional leaders not only falls far short of the goals of reform, but will place new burdens on families, seniors and state agencies.
First, the plan’s sponsors have claimed that if you like what you have you can keep it. That isn’t true. You may be forced to drop your current plan, especially if Congress includes an aggressive “public option” — a government-run health plan. According to one estimate by the Lewin Group, if the public option language in the bill passed by the House of Representatives becomes law as many as 40 percent of Americans could lose their private insurance and be forced into a government-run plan. The public option has been scaled back in subsequent versions of the legislation but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has clearly stated she wants the final bill to include the strongest possible public option. “There is no way I can pass a bill in the House of Representatives without a public option,” she said.
If you do manage to keep what you have, you can expect to pay significantly higher premiums, according to 10 separate government and independent studies. A self-employed Oklahoman or one working for a small business could see a premium increase of $1,600 annually, or $4,400 for a family policy. Small business owners could pay an extra $814 per employee to cover each of their employees, or they could face penalties imposed on them by the IRS.
Seniors will be hit hardest by the so-called reform bills. One out of every eight seniors in Oklahoma is enrolled in a program called Medicare Advantage, which provides Medicare patients with greater choices. Seniors enrolled in that program in our state — more than 81,000 seniors — could be forced to drop their plan and pick up the tab for any benefits they will lose. Bill sponsors are justifying cutting Medicare because it will supposedly help “pay for” reform. If congressional leaders were serious about paying for their plan they would eliminate their pet projects and some of the $350 billion government wastes every year. Instead, they are hoping to pay for their plan on the backs of seniors who are enrolled in the Medicare Advantage program they oppose on ideological grounds.
The bills also will place enormous new burdens on state agencies in Oklahoma, which already are facing 5 percent monthly reductions for the rest of the fiscal year because of declining state revenues. Provisions in the plan expanding Medicaid will force the state of Oklahoma to come up with at least $100 million in additional funds. It’s wrong for politicians in Washington who refuse to prioritize spending to outsource hard choices and fiscal responsibility to individuals, states and local communities.
Adding insult to injury, congressional leaders are expecting taxpayers in Oklahoma to subsidize the re-election campaigns of senators representing the states of Michigan, Nevada, Oregon and Rhode Island, all of which are exempted from additional Medicaid expenses for five years.
Every Oklahoman can expect to pay higher taxes if this plan passes. When the plan is implemented in 2013 thousands of state employees will be forced to pay an additional $1,100 in taxes every year because their plans will be considered too generous and will be hit with an excise tax.
Yet, what is even more troubling than what we know about the reform bills is what we don’t know. Congress has a terrible track record of estimating the long-term costs of government health programs. For instance, when Medicare was created in 1965 Congress predicted it would cost $12 billion in 1990. Instead, it cost $110 billion in 1990. Medicaid now costs 37 times what it did when it was launched in 1965; Medicare 16 times, both adjusted for inflation. If Congress’ projections are off again income tax rates will skyrocket.
I believe health care needs to be reformed, which is why I introduced a bill several months ago called the Patients’ Choice Act that empowers individuals rather than government bureaucrats. My plan gives every American access to high-quality plans, reduces health care costs, promotes prevention and lets doctors and patients decide what is best. Real reform is possible but the current plan is not real reform. America has the best health care in the world but it is far too costly. Unfortunately, the leading plan will destroy what is working in American health care and make existing problems, such as cost, worse for most Americans.
With the health care bills moving toward a vote in Congress I encourage you to keep up the pressure on Washington. Because you have made your voices heard, the bills have been moderated somewhat from the versions that were released this summer. Yet, Oklahomans should have no illusions about the goals of the politicians leading this process. This effort is about moving the country as close as possible to a single-payer health care system run by the government and paid for by higher taxes and premium costs for every American. Speaker Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and President Obama will take as big an incremental step toward their ultimate goal they believe they can get away with.
I can promise you that I’ll be on the Senate floor every possible moment conveying both my experience as a practicing physician and the common sense I’ve heard from people across our state. It’s time for Washington to keep the promises it already has made rather than making new promises we can’t afford.
SEN. TOM COBURN, R-Oklahoma, serves the state in the U.S. Senate. He may be reached by calling 231-4941 in Oklahoma City or 202-224-5754 in Washington, D.C.
Opinion
Health care reform bills will hurt Oklahoma’s seniors, families
- Opinion
-
-
Aerospace tax credits ensure viability of industry
April 15, 1953. Tax day again. It also marked the last time the U.S. lost a soldier from an enemy air attack.
-
Tax outrage stems from moral distaste
A study published this week in the journal Symbolic Interaction revisits the relationship between taxation and morality.
-
Suddenly, Asperger’s Syndrome is cured
My 11-year-old grandson just took his first trip off the diving board.
-
Book recalls Anastasia's story
In February of 1916 a young woman was pulled from the icy waters of a canal in Berlin, Germany.
-
iRead, you read, we all win
I’m thrilled to be able to announce the Oklahoma State Department of Education’s iRead initiative. Check out our iRead page on our website, http://ok.gov/sde/newsblogs/iRead.
With iRead, our goal is to ensure literacy for all Oklahomans from birth to 12th grade. Literacy is more than just reading. Being literate encompasses listening, speaking, reading, and writing — really all of communication. -
Growth revenue should go back to taxpayers
Over the next few days, the Legislature will consider a proposal to reduce Oklahoma’s income tax.
-
Thunder Up for Oklahoma
The Thunder basketball team has a big impact on the state of Oklahoma. Not just because we are excelling in the NBA playoffs.
-
Growth revenue should go back to taxpayers
Over the next few days, the Legislature will consider a proposal to reduce Oklahoma’s income tax. This year, Oklahoma state government will have more than $200 million of new growth revenue to spend. I believe it is vital for this revenue to go back to the taxpayers who overfinanced state government. This is important, because if the money is not returned, it will almost certainly be used to grow the size of government.
-
Tax cuts don’t make the grade
When is not big enough also too big?
-
Tax plan means keeping more of what you earn
The discussion about cutting Oklahoma’s income tax started before the legislative session.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Aerospace tax credits ensure viability of industry

