The Edmond Sun

Opinion

April 26, 2013

HEY HINK: Europe’s euthanasia enthusiasm is alarming

EDMOND — Have you heard of “The Groningen Protocol?” It may sound like a spy novel or suspense movie about shadowy conspiracies hatched in ivory towers by cadres of cynical utopian thinkers determined to co-opt society’s understanding of what it means to have a life worth living. Think “Soylent Green,” the science fiction movie where social planners faced with overpopulation and food shortages decide to alleviate the problem by encouraging senior citizens to embrace euthanasia. Their remains are then processed into nutritious green squares.

The Groningen Protocol is a set of guidelines specifying when physicians in the Netherlands can end the lives of infants without the fear of legal prosecution.

Before we take a closer look, let me admit to a bias you can factor in as you read on. My ethical antennae go up whenever humans make cool, rational, systematic decisions to end the lives of other humans not able to speak for themselves. I’m not saying I would categorically oppose this without regard to any argument that might be advanced. I’m just saying my default reaction to the idea of killing anyone who can’t speak for themselves is to say: “Stop. You can’t, you mustn’t cross that line. Because, once you embrace that principle — that we ourselves can decide which lives are worth living and which are not — the next step becomes easier.”

Now let’s take a look at that Groningen Protocol. In 2004, Dr. Eduard Verhagen, medical director of the Department of Pediatrics at the University Medical Center in Groningen, Netherlands, after consultation with various doctors and prosecutors, proposed criteria under which physicians could perform active ending of the lives of infants (children under 12). This protocol was ratified by the Dutch National Association of Pediatricians. Here are the guidelines: 1. The presence of hopeless and unbearable suffering; 2. Consent of the parents to the termination of life; 3. In consultation with appropriate medical personnel; and 4. Careful execution of the termination.

According to the statistics I was able to locate, more than 20 children have been killed (I could, of course, choose a softer word, but I’m not inclined to sugarcoat hard facts — they were killed) pursuant to this protocol. Most of them suffered from spina bifida or hydrocephalus. The rationale for this “killing” without the victim’s (yes victim) request or consent is this: The quality of this life is so miserable that the “victim” would, no doubt, approve (if they had mental legal capacity) and tell us so (if they could speak for themselves.) They would, no doubt, request euthanasia if they could. Maybe so. But something inside me quakes when I consider the ramifications of reasoning like this. Imagine someone saying: “Surely these poor orphaned infants would choose death over a life of privation, disease and malnutrition they’ll surely face if left to grow up in the squalor of this Kenyan slum.” Such a statement would rightly be met with outrage.

Conflicting heartstrings will be plucked as decent caring readers consider the merits of both sides of this argument. Surely putting these poor babies out of their misery is “an act of mercy.” But even assuming there’s some force to this argument, the line won’t be permanently drawn at the point of undeniable mercy. Someone will always be looking for “wiggle room.”

According to an article appearing in the May 1 issue of the journal “First Things,” Wesley J. Smith, senior fellow at The Discovery Institution’s Center on Human Exceptionalism and consultant for The Patient’s Rights Council, documents the creeping expansion of euthanasia in Europe. What started as a last resort for those facing unbearable pain or irreversible and progressive disease is expanded now to include those who are simply tired of coping with the challenges of life. By coincidence, those poor souls who make the decision to “end it all” under state-approved doctor supervision are becoming increasingly appealing sources for harvested organs to be used in transplants. Think variation on the “Soylent Green” thesis.

Already, the Groningen Protocol has been respectfully cited in the New England Journal of Medicine. Writers like bioethicist Jacob M. Appel of New York University is quoted as saying the protocol is “working and should be expanded.” This tendency to expand is exactly what worries us.

The eagerness to discard long-held and deeply treasured notions of what constitutes right and wrong is gathering speed. Many traditional Americans are alarmed at the disappearance of values that served as the bedrock for the strength and community of this country. Hopefully, progressive medical advances like the Groningen Protocol will not be permitted to successfully take root here. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is an Edmond resident and retired attorney.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Free trade on steroids: The threat of the Trans-Pacific Partnership

    Many supporters of the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, trade agreement are arguing that its fate rests on President Obama’s bilateral talks with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in Japan this week. If Japan and the United States can sort out market access issues for agriculture and automobiles, the wisdom goes, this huge deal — in effect, a North American Free Trade Agreement on steroids — can at last be concluded.

    April 22, 2014

  • Can Hillary Clinton rock the cradle and the world?

    What's most interesting to contemplate is the effect becoming a grandmother will have on Hillary's ambition. It's one of life's unfairnesses that a woman's peak career years often coincide with her peak childbearing years.

    April 22, 2014

  • Chicago Tribune: If Walgreen Co. moves its HQ to Europe, blame Washington’s tax failure

    The Walgreen Co. drugstore chain got its start nearly a century ago in downstate Dixon, Ill., before moving its corporate headquarters to Chicago and eventually to north suburban Deerfield, Ill.
    Next stop? Could be Bern, Switzerland.
    A group of shareholders reportedly is pressuring the giant retail chain for a move to the land of cuckoo clocks. The reason: lower taxes. Much lower taxes.
    If Walgreen changes its legal domicile to Switzerland, where it recently acquired a stake in European drugstore chain Alliance Boots, the company could save big bucks on its corporate income-tax bill. The effective U.S. income-tax rate for Walgreen, according to analysts at Swiss Bank UBS: 37 percent. For Alliance Boots: about 20 percent.

    April 21, 2014

  • Sulphur a future major tourist destination?

    Greta Garbo says, “I want to be alone,” in the 1932 film “Grand Hotel.” That MGM film starred Garbo, John and Lionel Barrymore, Wallace Beery and a young actress from Lawton named Joan Crawford. It told the stories of several different people who were staying at an exclusive hotel of that name in Berlin Germany.
    It was critically well received and it inspired more recent films such as “Gosford Park” and television shows such as “Downton Abbey” in that it detailed the relationship between powerful and wealthy people and those who served them. The film opened amidst much fanfare and it received the Oscar for best picture in the year of its release.

    April 21, 2014

  • St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Why poverty across the world matters to Americans

    A child starving in South Sudan should matter to Americans. That was the message delivered last week by Nancy Lindborg, whose job at the U.S. Agency for International Development is to lead a federal bureau spreading democracy and humanitarian assistance across the world.
    That world has reached a critical danger zone, with three high-level crises combining military conflict with humanitarian catastrophes affecting millions of innocents in Syria, the South Sudan and the Central African Republic.
    But back to that child.

    April 18, 2014

  • Government leadership complicit in overfilling prisons

    One of the thorniest problems facing any society is the question of what to do with transgressors. Obviously, the more complicated a culture becomes, the more factors come into play in trying to figure out what to do with those who choose not to “play by the rules.”

    April 18, 2014

  • My best days are ones normal people take for granted

    It is a weekend for working around the house. My fiancee, Erin, and I have the baby’s room to paint and some IKEA furniture to assemble. I roll out of bed early — 10:30 — and get into my wheelchair. Erin is already making coffee in the kitchen.
    “I started the first wall,” she says. “I love that gray.” Erin never bugs me about sleeping late. For a few months after I was injured in the Boston Marathon bombings, I often slept 15 hours a day. The doctors said my body needed to heal. It must still be healing because I hardly ever see 8 a.m. anymore.

    April 18, 2014

  • Instead of mothballing Navy ships, give them to our allies

    A bitter debate has raged in the Pentagon for several months about the wisdom of taking the nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington out of service to save money. The Washington, at 24 years old a relatively young vessel, is due for a costly refit, a routine procedure that all of the 11 large carriers in service undergo regularly.

    April 18, 2014

  • The pessimist’s guide to grizzly bears and Earth Day

    This coming Friday, to “celebrate Earth Day,” the Walt Disney Co. will release one of those cutesy, fun-for-all-ages, nature documentaries. “Bears” is about grizzly bears.
    The trailer says, “From DisneyNature comes a story that all parents share. About the love, the joy, the struggle and the strength it takes to raise a family.”
    Talk about your misguided “Hollywood values.” I previously have acknowledged a morbid, unreasonable fear of grizzly bears, stemming from a youth misspent reading grisly grizzly-attack articles in Readers Digest. This fear is only morbid and unreasonable because I live about 1,500 miles from the nearest wild grizzly bear. Still. ...

    April 16, 2014

  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

Poll

Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

Agree
Disagree
Undecided
     View Results