The Edmond Sun


August 30, 2013

HEY HINK: Global warming debate spreads thin

EDMOND — This week the BBC reported important news in the global warming debate. Before we get to that, let’s pause to consider the concept of “prejudice.” Break the word down into its constituent parts, and you’ll find “pre-,” which means “in advance,” and “judicium,” meaning judgment. One who is prejudiced, then, is one whose mind is made up and has no need for inconvenient facts. But, as John Adams pointed out, “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”

So what happens when a prejudiced person comes face-to-face with incontrovertible facts that contradict the prejudice? The profoundly stubborn, financially or emotionally invested in their biases, will simply deny the truth. (No matter what Galileo’s proof may be, you’ll never convince me the sun doesn’t revolve around the earth.)

The cynical partisan will grasp the truth, but continue to support the lie because it’s necessary to adhere to the party line and advance the agenda. Our comrades living under the glorious Soviet regime are the happiest people on earth.

But grown-ups who realize no one has a monopoly on the truth are willing to evaluate conflicting evidence on the strength of that evidence and judge on merit rather than prejudice.

Last week, former Vice President Gore in a Washington Post interview suggested those who disagree with his theories on global warming are comparable to homophobes, supporters of apartheid, advocates of slavery and families with alcoholic fathers. This seems unduly harsh and possibly alarmingly prejudiced in light with the current state of the science. But let’s take a look at the BBC article and you be the judge.

According to the Aug. 28 report, there has been a slowdown in global warming since 1998 even though there are increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Why? One explanation is that water vapor, soot and other aerosols in the atmosphere are reflecting sunlight back into space thus helping to cool the earth. Another possibility is that warming and cooling are the products of natural variability in the earth’s climate.

Whatever the explanation, this 1998 plateau in global warming is a difficult phenomenon for the doomsayers to explain. In the words of Professor Shang-Ping Xie of the Scripps Institute of Oceanography, “For people on the street, it is very confusing as to which story is closer to the truth.” Professor Xie is the principal author of a study suggesting that natural cooling, taking place in certain parts of the Pacific Ocean, is counteracting the effect of increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

According to Dr. Alex Sen Gupta of the University of New South Wales, this study “… clearly shows that recent slowdown is a consequence of natural oscillation.”

Evidently, there is a respected body of legitimate scientists pointing to objective data indicating, at least for the past 15 years, global warming has stopped and perhaps reversed in defiance of certain hysterical projections.

Despite the increasing temperature in the argument surrounding this debate, most of us are on the sidelines. We, as laypeople, are not competent to pass judgment on the scientific merits of these conflicting claims. It would be the height of arrogance and the grossest demonstration of vile prejudice to demonize the unpersuaded en masse as people who belong intellectually with homophobes and racists.

What other way the intractably prejudiced may respond to hard facts conflicting with their biases is to say this: OK, the evidence is against me now, but that doesn’t matter. Something will come up to prove me right later on. There are scientists, social engineers and entrepreneurs so emotionally and financially invested in stoking global panic that they are compelled to trivialize inconvenient truths inconsistent with their agenda. No doubt committed partisans will seize on the statement of Dr. Richard Allan of the University of Reading who acknowledges the recent slowdown in the rate of global warming but describes it as “a temporary respite.”

It seems the competing camps in the global warming debate are so polarized and emotionally committed to winning the argument they are willing to shred the evidence and process it through the machinery of individual and corporate prejudice. Unable to carry the day by force of scientific discussion, they stoop to calling their opponents insulting names.

A CNN headline announces “Gore says climate change deniers melting away.” One imagines a scene in the film “Invasion of the Body Snatchers,” where emotionless pod people gradually replacing thinking human beings nod knowingly to one another and say, “The others are melting away.” I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

Text Only
  • St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Why poverty across the world matters to Americans

    A child starving in South Sudan should matter to Americans. That was the message delivered last week by Nancy Lindborg, whose job at the U.S. Agency for International Development is to lead a federal bureau spreading democracy and humanitarian assistance across the world.
    That world has reached a critical danger zone, with three high-level crises combining military conflict with humanitarian catastrophes affecting millions of innocents in Syria, the South Sudan and the Central African Republic.
    But back to that child.

    April 18, 2014

  • Government leadership complicit in overfilling prisons

    One of the thorniest problems facing any society is the question of what to do with transgressors. Obviously, the more complicated a culture becomes, the more factors come into play in trying to figure out what to do with those who choose not to “play by the rules.”

    April 18, 2014

  • My best days are ones normal people take for granted

    It is a weekend for working around the house. My fiancee, Erin, and I have the baby’s room to paint and some IKEA furniture to assemble. I roll out of bed early — 10:30 — and get into my wheelchair. Erin is already making coffee in the kitchen.
    “I started the first wall,” she says. “I love that gray.” Erin never bugs me about sleeping late. For a few months after I was injured in the Boston Marathon bombings, I often slept 15 hours a day. The doctors said my body needed to heal. It must still be healing because I hardly ever see 8 a.m. anymore.

    April 18, 2014

  • Instead of mothballing Navy ships, give them to our allies

    A bitter debate has raged in the Pentagon for several months about the wisdom of taking the nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington out of service to save money. The Washington, at 24 years old a relatively young vessel, is due for a costly refit, a routine procedure that all of the 11 large carriers in service undergo regularly.

    April 18, 2014

  • The pessimist’s guide to grizzly bears and Earth Day

    This coming Friday, to “celebrate Earth Day,” the Walt Disney Co. will release one of those cutesy, fun-for-all-ages, nature documentaries. “Bears” is about grizzly bears.
    The trailer says, “From DisneyNature comes a story that all parents share. About the love, the joy, the struggle and the strength it takes to raise a family.”
    Talk about your misguided “Hollywood values.” I previously have acknowledged a morbid, unreasonable fear of grizzly bears, stemming from a youth misspent reading grisly grizzly-attack articles in Readers Digest. This fear is only morbid and unreasonable because I live about 1,500 miles from the nearest wild grizzly bear. Still. ...

    April 16, 2014

  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

  • Los Angeles Times: Congress extend jobless benefits again

    How’s this for irony: Having allowed federal unemployment benefits to run out in December, some lawmakers are balking at a bill to renew them retroactively because it might be hard to figure out who should receive them. Congress made this task far harder than it should have been, but the technical challenges aren’t insurmountable. Lawmakers should restore the benefits now and leave them in place until the unemployment rate reaches a more reasonable level.

    April 14, 2014

  • Many nations invested in Israel

    Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yoram Ettinger recently spoke to a gathering at the Chabad Center for Jewish Life and Learning in Oklahoma City. The event began with a presentation by Rabbi Ovadia Goldman, who told the attendee that the  upcoming Jewish holiday of Passover was an occasion for them to embrace the children of God, which is all of humanity.

    April 14, 2014

  • Coming soon: More ways to get to know your doctor

    Last week, the federal government released a massive database capable of providing patients with much more information about their doctors.
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government agency that runs Medicare, is posting on its website detailed information about how many visits and procedures individual health professionals billed the program for in 2012, and how much they were paid.
    This new trove of data, which covers 880,000 health professionals, adds to a growing body of information available to patients who don’t want to leave choosing a doctor to chance. But to put that information to good use, consumers need to be aware of what is available, what’s missing and how to interpret it.

    April 14, 2014

  • HEY HINK: Hateful bullies attempt to muffle free speech

    Hopefully we agree it should be a fundamental right to voice criticism of any religion you wish. And you should have the right to sing the praises of any religion you choose. If criticism of religion is unjust, feel free to make your best argument to prove it. If criticism is just, don’t be afraid to acknowledge and embrace it. If songs of praise are merited, feel free to join in. If not, feel free to ignore them. But no American should participate in curbing free speech just because expression of religious views makes someone uncomfortable.

    April 11, 2014


Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

     View Results