The Edmond Sun

Opinion

September 21, 2013

HEY HINK: Bureaucracy threatens civilized solutions

EDMOND — In the interest of fairness, I need to make a disclosure. I have a bias against bureaucracies. Throughout my adult life, I have, again and again, been forced to yield to the dictates of bureaucrats in order to secure information, assets, licenses, certificates, transcripts, admissions, releases, documents, waivers, copies and refunds to which I was undeniably entitled. I have filled out countless forms, paid duplicative fees, been shunted from office to office, placed on hold, sent to the back of the line, delayed, denied and ignored.

This column isn’t long enough to catalog my many encounters with smug, incompetent, dictatorial, unfeeling, lazy, forgetful, rude, paranoid and semi-conscious bureaucrats; so I won’t.

I will resist the temptation to use this column as a forum to expose a typically bureaucratic outrage inflicted upon a colleague who recently acquired her MFA degree. This is as high as one can go in the academic field of creative writing. It is as demanding, time-consuming and rigorous as any English Ph.D. program. But, since the educational bureaucracy is lagging behind the educational times, she is not considered qualified for the compensation package to which a successful Ph.D. candidate would be entitled. One is reminded of a quote by Laurence J. Peter who formulated the famous “Peter principle.” “Bureaucracy defends the status quo long after the time when the quo has lost its status.”

But I don’t want to make this personal. Let’s just take a look at a recent news item.

Back in June, Nakia Grimes, the 37-year-old mother of a little boy, needed to renew her driver’s license. She didn’t realize the Georgia Legislature had imposed additional documentary burdens on citizens applying for renewed licenses. She needed a birth certificate or passport, neither of which she had.

When she went to secure a copy of her birth certificate, she discovered, to her amazement, disappointment and embarrassment that someone checked the wrong box when she was born. According to the document, she was a baby boy. This was clearly a clerical error committed without any culpability on Grimes’ part. The solution seems simple. Amend the certificate.

But the simple solution was out of the question. The bureaucrat in charge informed Grimes if she wanted to amend the document and renew her driver’s license, she must follow these steps to prove she was, in fact, a woman; 1. Go get a Pap smear, 2. Get a doctor’s note verifying the test results, 3. Have the note verified by a notary public.

While we’re waiting for the magnitude of this expensive, humiliating bureaucratic burden to sink in, let’s keep a couple of things in mind.

First, Grimes had absolutely no part in creating this problem. Consequently, to cast upon her the burden and expense of correcting somebody else’s “screw up” seems patently unfair. In addition, it’s not as if she’s free to say, “I refuse to participate.” As a mother, her life becomes immeasurably more complicated if she has no driver’s license. She really had no choice. She had to persuade the bureaucrats to grant her that license.

Grimes’ case came to the attention of local news professionals who shined a light on the situation. Sure enough, this exposure caused bureaucrats higher up the food chain to come scurrying to her assistance. After high level conferencing punctuated by some checking and crosschecking, the Georgia bureaucrats came up with an inspired solution. On one hand, they had Grimes’ birth certificate suggesting she was a baby boy. On the other hand, they had her son’s birth certificate establishing she was the boy’s mother. After some head scratching, it was agreed that giving birth to a child was sufficient evidence that Grimes was, after all, a woman. Her birth certificate was amended.

Though Grimes suffered the wear and tear of being processed through the bureaucratic machine, her story had a satisfactory ending. But for every happy conclusion, there are thousands of voiceless victims every day who endure the furies and frustrations inherent in dealing with bureaucracies.

The perils of falling into the hands of an unfeeling bureaucracy are bad enough. Ask Ms. Grimes. But recent developments suggest the rise of a new phenomenon; the tyranny of the malevolent bureaucracy. Just ask those unfavored groups still awaiting IRS approval of their tax-exempt status. We have to ask ourselves, why on earth would Americans sit still and let the federal government blanket us with the most massive centralized bureaucracy in the history of mankind? Beats me. We’d do well to recall Balzac’s warning; “Bureaucracy is a giant mechanism operated by pygmies.” I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Instead of mothballing Navy ships, give them to our allies

    A bitter debate has raged in the Pentagon for several months about the wisdom of taking the nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington out of service to save money. The Washington, at 24 years old a relatively young vessel, is due for a costly refit, a routine procedure that all of the 11 large carriers in service undergo regularly.

    April 18, 2014

  • The pessimist’s guide to grizzly bears and Earth Day

    This coming Friday, to “celebrate Earth Day,” the Walt Disney Co. will release one of those cutesy, fun-for-all-ages, nature documentaries. “Bears” is about grizzly bears.
    The trailer says, “From DisneyNature comes a story that all parents share. About the love, the joy, the struggle and the strength it takes to raise a family.”
    Talk about your misguided “Hollywood values.” I previously have acknowledged a morbid, unreasonable fear of grizzly bears, stemming from a youth misspent reading grisly grizzly-attack articles in Readers Digest. This fear is only morbid and unreasonable because I live about 1,500 miles from the nearest wild grizzly bear. Still. ...

    April 16, 2014

  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

  • Los Angeles Times: Congress extend jobless benefits again

    How’s this for irony: Having allowed federal unemployment benefits to run out in December, some lawmakers are balking at a bill to renew them retroactively because it might be hard to figure out who should receive them. Congress made this task far harder than it should have been, but the technical challenges aren’t insurmountable. Lawmakers should restore the benefits now and leave them in place until the unemployment rate reaches a more reasonable level.

    April 14, 2014

  • Many nations invested in Israel

    Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yoram Ettinger recently spoke to a gathering at the Chabad Center for Jewish Life and Learning in Oklahoma City. The event began with a presentation by Rabbi Ovadia Goldman, who told the attendee that the  upcoming Jewish holiday of Passover was an occasion for them to embrace the children of God, which is all of humanity.

    April 14, 2014

  • Coming soon: More ways to get to know your doctor

    Last week, the federal government released a massive database capable of providing patients with much more information about their doctors.
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government agency that runs Medicare, is posting on its website detailed information about how many visits and procedures individual health professionals billed the program for in 2012, and how much they were paid.
    This new trove of data, which covers 880,000 health professionals, adds to a growing body of information available to patients who don’t want to leave choosing a doctor to chance. But to put that information to good use, consumers need to be aware of what is available, what’s missing and how to interpret it.

    April 14, 2014

  • HEY HINK: Hateful bullies attempt to muffle free speech

    Hopefully we agree it should be a fundamental right to voice criticism of any religion you wish. And you should have the right to sing the praises of any religion you choose. If criticism of religion is unjust, feel free to make your best argument to prove it. If criticism is just, don’t be afraid to acknowledge and embrace it. If songs of praise are merited, feel free to join in. If not, feel free to ignore them. But no American should participate in curbing free speech just because expression of religious views makes someone uncomfortable.

    April 11, 2014

  • Putting Oklahoma parents in charge

    Oklahoma’s public schools serve many children very well. Still, for various reasons, some students’ needs are better met in private schools, in virtual schools or elsewhere. That is why two state lawmakers have introduced legislation to give parents debit cards, literally, to shop for the educational services that work best for their children.

    April 11, 2014

  • Israelis, Palestinians are losing their chance

    Developments in the Middle East suggest that prospects of success for the Israeli-Palestinian talks, to which Secretary of State John Kerry has devoted countless hours and trips, are weakening.

    April 11, 2014

  • Teens might trade naked selfies for mugshots

    Will teenagers ever learn? You think yours will. Maybe so. But it's likely that was also the hope of the parents of children who were so shamed by nude photos of themselves that went south - how else can they go - that they killed themselves.

    April 11, 2014

Poll

Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

Agree
Disagree
Undecided
     View Results