The Edmond Sun

Opinion

October 25, 2013

The captain determines the destination of the ship

EDMOND — The captain was not on the bridge when the ship ran aground. Everyone, and by everyone in the civilized world, knew the vessel was about to execute a difficult maneuver. It was the captain himself who set the course with the express purpose of making this dicey maneuver. He had years to prepare the vessel, the crew and himself for the unique demands to be encountered if the maneuver was to succeed.

The captain knew the precise moment the maneuver was to be executed. This feat of maritime daring was publicized in every major newspaper on earth. The captain intentionally drew the eyes of the world to this moment in history. This red-letter day would be his historical achievement, his crowning moment, his legacy. And yet, as the moment approached, the captain was absent from the bridge.

Long before the ship arrived at the critical point in the voyage, members of the crew began to suspect — years of preparation and endless hype notwithstanding — the dangerous maneuver could not be successfully completed on the captain’s schedule. But the captain had no mechanism in the chain of command allowing the crew’s reservations to reach the ears of the commander. For some reason, the captain was functionally deaf to the crew’s apprehensions. Whatever anxiety the crew might have, the captain was not interested in hearing about it.

A week before the moment of truth finally arrived, someone ordered a simulation to determine whether the ship could actually perform the functions required in order for the ship to successfully navigate the critical challenge. The captain was not present when the simulation was performed. Evidently, there was no procedure requiring him to be notified if alarms sounded suggesting there might be doubt about the ultimate success of the maneuver.

The simulations suggested the whole enterprise might be destined to fail. The captain was not present when the simulation took place. He exhibited no interest in the simulation. In fact, the captain may have been totally ignorant concerning the simulation and its disastrous outcome. He had no standing orders in place demanding that he be notified in case his crew detected danger ahead. If there were such orders, nobody bothered to obey them.

The thoroughly predictable disaster occurred. The ship ran aground. The extent of the damage is, for now, unknown. According to some estimates, the owners of the vessel may be on the hook for $500 million or more.

Hearings are underway to determine what went wrong. The captain has not testified and probably won’t. His second in command says the captain was blameless. He wasn’t informed concerning the disastrous failure of his maneuver until a day or two after it happened. As for why he was so dismally uninformed, unaccountably disconnected and oblivious to all warning signs, no one is saying. As for why he was nowhere near the bridge when the vessel beached, the record is and will probably remain silent. We are told he was “blind-sided” by this monumental foul-up.

Unfortunately, this poor captain has a history of being “blind-sided.” One of the captain’s main responsibilities is to provide for the security of his crew. Though there were warnings that members of his crew were at risk due to security shortcomings, the captain was kept in the dark concerning the danger and he had no provision in the chain of command requiring that he be notified of such dangers. He was “blind-sided” when members of his crew were killed in an avoidable attack. No one knows whether the captain reported to the bridge when he learned the attack was underway.

It is the captain’s responsibility to be answerable for the good behavior of his crew. He is expected to lead by example and demand that his crew behave honorably and responsibly while under his command. This captain was “blind-sided” when he learned that responsible members of his crew were committing gross abuses of their authority and subverting the ship’s primary purpose.

Without doubt, one of the captain’s main responsibilities is to take command and be on the bridge when crisis looms. According to one definition of the nautical bridge, “During critical maneuvers, the captain will be on the bridge…” If the captain is wilfully absent and disaster results excuses may prove to be unbelievable, cowardly and constitute a gross responsibility dodge.

Some time ago, this column pointed out that some people are unsuited to command. It’s not their fault, it’s just they don’t have the temperament, experience or aptitude. As the captain of the Costa Concordia acknowledged when his vessel ran aground, “I have made a mess.”

I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • The pessimist’s guide to grizzly bears and Earth Day

    This coming Friday, to “celebrate Earth Day,” the Walt Disney Co. will release one of those cutesy, fun-for-all-ages, nature documentaries. “Bears” is about grizzly bears.
    The trailer says, “From DisneyNature comes a story that all parents share. About the love, the joy, the struggle and the strength it takes to raise a family.”
    Talk about your misguided “Hollywood values.” I previously have acknowledged a morbid, unreasonable fear of grizzly bears, stemming from a youth misspent reading grisly grizzly-attack articles in Readers Digest. This fear is only morbid and unreasonable because I live about 1,500 miles from the nearest wild grizzly bear. Still. ...

    April 16, 2014

  • Digging out of the CIA-Senate quagmire

    Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., voted to declassify parts of its report on the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program. The White House, the CIA and the Senate still have to negotiate which portions of the report will be redacted before it is made public. But this is an important step in resolving the ugly dispute that has erupted between the intelligence committee and the intelligence agency.
    The dispute presents two very serious questions. Was the program consistent with American values and did it produce valuable intelligence? And is effective congressional oversight of secret activities possible in our democracy?

    April 15, 2014

  • Los Angeles Times: Congress extend jobless benefits again

    How’s this for irony: Having allowed federal unemployment benefits to run out in December, some lawmakers are balking at a bill to renew them retroactively because it might be hard to figure out who should receive them. Congress made this task far harder than it should have been, but the technical challenges aren’t insurmountable. Lawmakers should restore the benefits now and leave them in place until the unemployment rate reaches a more reasonable level.

    April 14, 2014

  • Many nations invested in Israel

    Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yoram Ettinger recently spoke to a gathering at the Chabad Center for Jewish Life and Learning in Oklahoma City. The event began with a presentation by Rabbi Ovadia Goldman, who told the attendee that the  upcoming Jewish holiday of Passover was an occasion for them to embrace the children of God, which is all of humanity.

    April 14, 2014

  • Coming soon: More ways to get to know your doctor

    Last week, the federal government released a massive database capable of providing patients with much more information about their doctors.
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government agency that runs Medicare, is posting on its website detailed information about how many visits and procedures individual health professionals billed the program for in 2012, and how much they were paid.
    This new trove of data, which covers 880,000 health professionals, adds to a growing body of information available to patients who don’t want to leave choosing a doctor to chance. But to put that information to good use, consumers need to be aware of what is available, what’s missing and how to interpret it.

    April 14, 2014

  • HEY HINK: Hateful bullies attempt to muffle free speech

    Hopefully we agree it should be a fundamental right to voice criticism of any religion you wish. And you should have the right to sing the praises of any religion you choose. If criticism of religion is unjust, feel free to make your best argument to prove it. If criticism is just, don’t be afraid to acknowledge and embrace it. If songs of praise are merited, feel free to join in. If not, feel free to ignore them. But no American should participate in curbing free speech just because expression of religious views makes someone uncomfortable.

    April 11, 2014

  • Putting Oklahoma parents in charge

    Oklahoma’s public schools serve many children very well. Still, for various reasons, some students’ needs are better met in private schools, in virtual schools or elsewhere. That is why two state lawmakers have introduced legislation to give parents debit cards, literally, to shop for the educational services that work best for their children.

    April 11, 2014

  • Israelis, Palestinians are losing their chance

    Developments in the Middle East suggest that prospects of success for the Israeli-Palestinian talks, to which Secretary of State John Kerry has devoted countless hours and trips, are weakening.

    April 11, 2014

  • Teens might trade naked selfies for mugshots

    Will teenagers ever learn? You think yours will. Maybe so. But it's likely that was also the hope of the parents of children who were so shamed by nude photos of themselves that went south - how else can they go - that they killed themselves.

    April 11, 2014

  • Tax deadline and no reform in sight

    The annual tax filing deadline, which comes next Tuesday, provides a good opportunity for tax reform advocates to decry the current law’s increasing complexity and inequities, and to urge enactment of a simpler, fairer system.

    April 10, 2014

Poll

Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

Agree
Disagree
Undecided
     View Results