The Edmond Sun

Opinion

September 7, 2013

Tell us Mr. President, why we should trust you

EDMOND — Not long ago, I ran across the translation of a treatise on war written about 2,500 years ago. Permit me to paraphrase. An ancient Chinese emperor contemplating war summoned his counselors and asked what he could do to guarantee the support and obedience of his subjects in the conduct of that war. According to tradition, the wise Master Sun replied, “To be confident in the support and obedience of your subjects, be thou trustworthy as a matter of course.”

President Obama and the Congress of the United States are about to ask the American people to throw their support into another war. They will ask us to commit the resources of our country, resources that might otherwise be used for the good of our citizens at home and for the good of others around the world. They will ask us to be co-participants in the plans and actions of unscrupulous men whose endeavors will, without question, lead to the spilling of the blood of innocent women and children. That’s what war is and always has been.

They will ask us to approve this destruction, bloodshed and suffering because we believe some good will come of it. They will ask us to harden our hearts to those who cry out for peace because, they will tell us, participation in this conflict is justified. They will recite, as a mantra, we are a peace-loving nation.

The president and Congress will present us with passionate arguments intended to illustrate why involvement in this war is the right thing for a moral nation. They will muster an array of seemingly irrefutable facts and figures calculated to overwhelm any resistance that might be advanced in opposition to our involvement in another brutal conflict in the Middle East. Some supporters of war will label opponents as unpatriotic and insensitive to the plight of children. They will insist that we have much to gain morally, ethically, geopolitically and economically if we’ll get over our hesitations and get into this thing.

Before we, the American people, rubber-stamp this action, before we shout “amen” to the call for war, I have a proposal. Let’s require our political leaders to follow a wise and ancient model. Let’s require them to prove they are trustworthy.

Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen of the Congress, before you get into another war, in our name, tell us why we should trust you.

Tell us why we should trust your experience. Show us how you have skillfully navigated the bloody waters of warfare in the past and brought this nation safely to the peaceful destination you promised.

Tell us why we should trust your judgment. Show us how you have maneuvered through and around challenging international obstacles in ways that cause respect among our enemies, confidence among our allies and pride among our citizens.

Tell us why we should trust your motives. Show us how you have made sacrifices for the good of us all. Show us how you have led by example. Show us that your behavior is the strongest argument to prove you have the best interests of the people — all the people — and the country at heart.

Tell us why we should trust your skills. Show us how you have been good stewards of the resources entrusted to you. Show us how you have competently handled the responsibilities of the job you were hired to do. Show us that you are capable of managing large complex tasks without waste, graft and stupidity.

Tell us why we should trust your word. Remind us of those instances where you have promised us that you would accomplish great things, furnish real benefits, carry out ambitious projects and then delivered on those promises.

Please spare us the double talk, the hot air, the vain self-congratulation, the lies. Be straight with us this time. The American people want to do the right thing. They want their leaders to be on the side of justice, peace and rationality. They want to have confidence in the truthfulness, morality, competence and wisdom of their leaders.

We want to know that you are not making a mockery of our trust. We want to know that you are not chuckling behind closed doors and saying among yourselves, “How many times will they fall for it? How many times will they play Charlie Brown to our Lucy? How many times will they believe us when we promise they can trust us this time?”

The American people have been misled, betrayed and lied to in matters of warfare before. Let’s demand trustworthiness before we go down that path again. I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Loosening constraints on campaign donations and spending doesn’t destroy democracy

    Campaign finance reformers are worried about the future. They contend that two Supreme Court rulings — the McCutcheon decision in March and the 2010 Citizens United decision — will magnify inequality in U.S. politics.
    In both cases, the court majority relaxed constraints on how money can be spent on or donated to political campaigns. By allowing more private money to flow to campaigns, the critics maintain, the court has allowed the rich an unfair advantage in shaping political outcomes and made “one dollar, one vote” (in one formulation) the measure of our corrupted democracy.
    This argument misses the mark for at least four reasons.

    April 23, 2014

  • The top 12 government programs ever

    Which federal programs and policies succeed in being cost-effective and targeting those who need them most? These two tests are obvious: After all, why would we spend taxpayers' money on a program that isn't worth what it costs or helps those who do not need help?

    April 23, 2014

  • Free trade on steroids: The threat of the Trans-Pacific Partnership

    Many supporters of the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, trade agreement are arguing that its fate rests on President Obama’s bilateral talks with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in Japan this week. If Japan and the United States can sort out market access issues for agriculture and automobiles, the wisdom goes, this huge deal — in effect, a North American Free Trade Agreement on steroids — can at last be concluded.

    April 22, 2014

  • Can Hillary Clinton rock the cradle and the world?

    What's most interesting to contemplate is the effect becoming a grandmother will have on Hillary's ambition. It's one of life's unfairnesses that a woman's peak career years often coincide with her peak childbearing years.

    April 22, 2014

  • Chicago Tribune: If Walgreen Co. moves its HQ to Europe, blame Washington’s tax failure

    The Walgreen Co. drugstore chain got its start nearly a century ago in downstate Dixon, Ill., before moving its corporate headquarters to Chicago and eventually to north suburban Deerfield, Ill.
    Next stop? Could be Bern, Switzerland.
    A group of shareholders reportedly is pressuring the giant retail chain for a move to the land of cuckoo clocks. The reason: lower taxes. Much lower taxes.
    If Walgreen changes its legal domicile to Switzerland, where it recently acquired a stake in European drugstore chain Alliance Boots, the company could save big bucks on its corporate income-tax bill. The effective U.S. income-tax rate for Walgreen, according to analysts at Swiss Bank UBS: 37 percent. For Alliance Boots: about 20 percent.

    April 21, 2014

  • Sulphur a future major tourist destination?

    Greta Garbo says, “I want to be alone,” in the 1932 film “Grand Hotel.” That MGM film starred Garbo, John and Lionel Barrymore, Wallace Beery and a young actress from Lawton named Joan Crawford. It told the stories of several different people who were staying at an exclusive hotel of that name in Berlin Germany.
    It was critically well received and it inspired more recent films such as “Gosford Park” and television shows such as “Downton Abbey” in that it detailed the relationship between powerful and wealthy people and those who served them. The film opened amidst much fanfare and it received the Oscar for best picture in the year of its release.

    April 21, 2014

  • St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Why poverty across the world matters to Americans

    A child starving in South Sudan should matter to Americans. That was the message delivered last week by Nancy Lindborg, whose job at the U.S. Agency for International Development is to lead a federal bureau spreading democracy and humanitarian assistance across the world.
    That world has reached a critical danger zone, with three high-level crises combining military conflict with humanitarian catastrophes affecting millions of innocents in Syria, the South Sudan and the Central African Republic.
    But back to that child.

    April 18, 2014

  • Government leadership complicit in overfilling prisons

    One of the thorniest problems facing any society is the question of what to do with transgressors. Obviously, the more complicated a culture becomes, the more factors come into play in trying to figure out what to do with those who choose not to “play by the rules.”

    April 18, 2014

  • My best days are ones normal people take for granted

    It is a weekend for working around the house. My fiancee, Erin, and I have the baby’s room to paint and some IKEA furniture to assemble. I roll out of bed early — 10:30 — and get into my wheelchair. Erin is already making coffee in the kitchen.
    “I started the first wall,” she says. “I love that gray.” Erin never bugs me about sleeping late. For a few months after I was injured in the Boston Marathon bombings, I often slept 15 hours a day. The doctors said my body needed to heal. It must still be healing because I hardly ever see 8 a.m. anymore.

    April 18, 2014

  • Instead of mothballing Navy ships, give them to our allies

    A bitter debate has raged in the Pentagon for several months about the wisdom of taking the nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington out of service to save money. The Washington, at 24 years old a relatively young vessel, is due for a costly refit, a routine procedure that all of the 11 large carriers in service undergo regularly.

    April 18, 2014

Poll

Do you agree with a state budget proposal that takes some funds away from road and bridge projects to ramp up education funding by $29.85 million per year until schools are receiving $600 million more a year than they are now? In years in which 1 percent revenue growth does not occur in the general fund, the transfer would not take place.

Agree
Disagree
Undecided
     View Results