The Edmond Sun

Opinion

July 5, 2013

HEY HINK: Upholding Constitution remains a sacred duty

EDMOND — During our Independence Day reflections, let’s keep something in mind. It’s the non-delegable responsibility of every generation to treasure, preserve and pass on the full measure of freedom we received from generations before us. At this time of year, we should take stock of our precious liberties. In doing so, we must be mindful of two important truths. First, we enjoy these liberties because previous generations were stubborn and courageous in their determination to hand them down. Next, we have a duty — a sacred duty — to hand these liberties undiminished to the generations that follow. To the extent we squander, sell, barter or permit these liberties to be stolen, we break faith with those who came before us and we betray those who come after.

The patriots who founded this country knew to a certainty their sacrifices, labors, studies, compromises and their faith had established the greatest foundation for individual liberty the world had ever seen. They also knew to a certainty government by its nature, chafes at the exercise of individual liberty. Government is never satisfied with its quantum of power. It always wants more control. Government is never satisfied with its portion of the national wealth. It always wants a greater share of everything. Government is never comfortable when its shortcomings are exposed to the light of day. By its nature government craves obedience and predictability. Consequently, individual liberty can only be guaranteed when a constitution serves as a restraining bit in the teeth of government quest for power and wealth.

Since the founding of this country, we have seen government’s relentless efforts to restrain the vote, disadvantage the weak, amass the wealth, deceive the electorate, silence dissent and weaken constitutional restraints on its power. Most of these efforts have been thwarted by the solid safeguards built into the Constitution of the United States.

Throughout this country’s history, the bulwark against governmental intrusion into the personal liberties of American citizens was the fidelity of the United States Supreme Court. So long as the members of the court were committed to impartial application of the law, the rights of American citizens were, more or less, in safe hands.

Since there are no meaningful checks and balances when it comes to Supreme Court constitutional decisions, the confidence of American citizens in the integrity of the American political system depends on a competent, dedicated and impartial court. Some years ago, the majority of the Supreme Court realized they had the power to so “elasticize” the wording of the Constitution that it could be made to mean whatever a majority of the court decided it meant.

More recently, the court has attempted to bring its decisions more in line with the “original intent” of the Constitution’s drafters. Predictably, when the court’s decisions were more to the liking of the liberals, conservatives cried “foul.” Today, as the court has more conservative leanings, liberals warn that the sky is falling.

But there’s something new in the air. When the Supreme Court was at its most liberal, conservatives were urging a return to the Constitution. Today, finding the Constitution is an impediment to liberal social planning, a number of important liberal legal scholars are suggesting that we “scrap” the Constitution.

On Dec. 30, 2012, constitutional scholar Michael Seidman published an op-ed piece in the New York Times titled “Let’s Give up on the Constitution.” In this article, he described the framers as “… a group of white propertied men who had been dead for two centuries, knew nothing of our present situation, acted illegally under existing law and thought it was fine to own slaves.” Simon has now written a book “On Constitutional Disobedience” in which he argues that the Constitution is outdated and should be scrapped. The July 11 issue of “The New York Review of Books,” carries David Cole’s review of that book under the headline “Should We Discard the Constitution?” To his credit, Mr. Cole, another noted constitutional scholar, argues in favor of keeping the Constitution.

Whether we like it or not, this generation faces an assault on individual freedom unlike any that ever threatened this country before. There were never more blatant government intrusions into the day-to-day decisions of American citizens. There was never more widespread government discrimination on those holding views the government finds troubling. There was never such rampant abuse of governmental power in America’s history.

In this nation’s history, it has never been more important for the citizens to demand that all public servants be faithful to their oath to “Uphold and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States.” I’m Hink and I’ll see ya.

MIKE HINKLE is a retired attorney and Edmond resident.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014

  • Remembering lessons from 1974

    This week marks the 40th anniversary of an important milestone in America’s constitutional history. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to order the Nixon White House to turn over audiotapes that would prove the president and his close aides were guilty of criminal violations. This ruling established with crystal clarity that the executive branch could not hide behind the shield of executive privilege to protect itself from the consequences of illegal behavior. It was a triumph for the continued vitality of our constitutional form of government.

    July 25, 2014

  • RedBlueAmerica: Is parenting being criminalized in America?

    Debra Harrell was arrested recently after the McDonald’s employee let her daughter spend the day playing in a nearby park while she worked her shift. The South Carolina woman says her daughter had a cell phone in case of danger, and critics say that children once were given the independence to spend a few unsupervised hours in a park.
    Is it a crime to parent “free-range” kids? Does Harrell deserve her problems? Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuk, the RedBlueAmerica columnists, debate the issue.

    July 24, 2014

  • Technology that will stimulate journalism’s future is now here

    To say technology has changed the newspaper media industry is understating the obvious. While much discussion focuses on how we read the news, technology is changing the way we report the news. The image of a reporter showing up to a scene with a pen and a pad is iconic but lost to the vestiges of time.
    I am asked frequently about the future of newspapers and, in particular, what does a successful future look like. For journalists, to be successful is to command multiple technologies and share news with readers in new and exciting ways.

    July 23, 2014

  • New Orleans features its own “Running of the Bulls”

    On July12, the streets of the Warehouse District of New Orleans were filled with thousands of young men who were seeking to avoid being hit with plastic bats wielded by women on roller skates as part of the annual “Running of the Bulls” that takes place in New Orleans.
    The event is based on the “Running of the Bulls” that occurs in Pamplona, Spain, that is  part of an annual occurrence in which a group of bulls rampage through the streets of Pamplona while men run from them to avoid being gored by their sharp horns. That event was introduced to the English-speaking world by Ernest Hemingway, who included scenes from it in his critically acclaimed 1926 novel “The Sun also Rises.”

    July 22, 2014

  • OTHER VIEW: Newsday: Lapses on deadly diseases demand explanation

    When we heard that the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had created a potentially lethal safety risk by improperly sending deadly pathogens — like anthrax — to other laboratories around the country, our first reaction was disbelief.

    July 22, 2014

  • Holding government accountable for open meeting violations

    A few weeks ago I wrote about the recent success of three important government transparency proposals which will go into law this year.

    July 21, 2014

  • GUEST OPINION — Oklahoma GOP voters want educational choices

    A Braun Research survey released in January showed that Oklahoma voters — Republicans, Democrats, and Independents alike — favor parental choice in education.

    July 21, 2014

  • HEY HINK: IRS interferes with citizens’ rights of free speech

    The patient is gravely ill. We have detected traces of a deadly venom in the bloodstream. We don’t know how widespread the poison is, but we know, if not counteracted, toxins of this kind can rot the patient’s vital organs and could ultimately prove fatal.

    July 19, 2014

Poll

If the Republican runoff for the 5th District congressional seat were today, which candidate would you vote for?

Patrice Douglas
Steve Russell
Undecided
     View Results