The Edmond Sun


January 4, 2013

BY THE NUMBERS: Let’s solve today’s problems first

EDMOND — In the end Congress did most of what it needed to do to stave off a recession (probably) for now. For some reason though, there are those walking the halls of Congress intent on making sure that a recession comes this year.

In the waning hours of the 112th Congress, the House of Representatives approved a compromise bill hammered about in the U.S. Senate helping taxpayers avert a significant income tax increase. The measure, which has since been signed by President Obama, will permanently extend the Bush income tax cuts for 98 percent of Americans while postponing mandatory spending cuts for another two months. Those income tax cuts were slated to expire on Jan. 1 unless Congress acted. While the measure had overwhelming bipartisan support in the U.S. Senate, the measure only passed the House due to support from House Democrats as most House Republicans opposed the deal including local Congressman James Lankford.

Interestingly, it took House Democrats, a Democrat-controlled Senate and a Democrat President to pass legislation averting a massive tax increase.

Of course, tax cuts aren’t free. According to the Congressional Budget Office the law will increase the national debt by nearly $4 trillion in the next 10 years, mostly from extending the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts. There is some additional spending in the law, mostly for extended unemployment insurance payments (which Congress typically extends during periods of high unemployment like today) and the extension of several tax credits (which count not as a tax cut but as a spending increase). However, the bulk of the impact on the debt comes from the tax cuts.

Of course, eventually Congress must find ways to reduce our debt as a trillion dollar annual deficit is not sustainable. Since during the last few years, in response to the economic crisis and terrorist threats, government spending has risen, it is reasonable for government spending to decline eventually. Furthermore, since during the last few years taxes have been at their lowest rate (as a percentage of the economy) in 50 years, it is also reasonable that taxes eventually will have to rise. Finally, since in the long-run Medicare and Social Security spending will far outpace revenues, it is reasonable that these two entitlement programs eventually will need to be reformed.

These things must happen eventually. And the quicker we start planning for these the better. But while our growing national debt is a concern, it is not our most pressing economic concern — unemployment is.

According to figures released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics this week, the U.S. unemployment rate ended the year at 7.8 percent. While this is much better than the 10.0 percent unemployment rate registered in 2009 at the worst of the Great Recession, it is still not low enough. While the economy has added 5.3 million private-sector jobs the last 34 months, too many Americans still cannot find the job they need. While the economy continues to recover, it has still not fully recovered.

We could, if we wanted, balance the federal budget next year. The solution requires simple arithmetic — we just need to raise taxes and cut government spending. However, economic science tells us (and historical evidence shows us) that both of these actions will contract the economy and make unemployment worse. In short, solving our long-term debt problem exacerbates short-term unemployment problem.

In short, with 7.8 percent unemployment now is not the time to raise taxes on anyone or to cut any government spending.

Instead of trying to solve our debt problem this year, Congress should focus on reducing unemployment first. We know what needs to be done. According to independent forecasting firms, if Congress had passed President Obama’s American Jobs Act last year, one million fewer people would be unemployed today. Yes, it would have required a short-term increase in our national debt to address this problem but it would make a significant difference in the health of our economy and the happiness of our families. In a few years once our economy returns to firmer footing, we can then turn our attention to solving our long-term problems.

In arguing for his preferred economic policy, Congressman Lankford often has said, “Washington does not have a revenue problem, it has a spending problem.” It’s obvious though, that right now America has an unemployment problem. So, here’s a novel idea for Congress — let’s solve today’s problem first.

MICKEY HEPNER is the dean of the College of Business Administration at the University of Central Oklahoma. Hepner serves on the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors for The Oklahoma Academy.

Text Only
  • Welfare state grows as self-sufficiency declines

    For the past 50 years, the government’s annual poverty rate has hardly changed at all. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 15 percent of Americans still live in poverty, roughly the same rate as the mid-1960s when the War on Poverty was just starting.
    After adjusting for inflation, federal and state welfare spending today is 16 times greater than it was when President Lyndon B. Johnson launched the War on Poverty. If converted into cash, current means-tested spending is five times the amount needed to eliminate all official poverty in the U.S.
    How can the government spend so much while poverty remains unchanged? The answer is simple: The Census Bureau’s “poverty” figures are woefully incomplete.

    August 1, 2014

  • Let laughter reign in Turkey

    This week, Bulent Arinc, the Deputy Prime Minister of Turkey, verbally chastised Turkish women for laughing in public. Before we take a closer look at these remarks — in the interest of full disclosure — I need to confess a personal bias. I love to hear my wife’s laughter. Sometimes, when I review the day’s highlights, the most pleasant thing that comes to mind is her laugh — it’s frequent, genuine, pleasantly-pitched, melodious, appropriately timed, infectious and charming.

    August 1, 2014

  • Is English getting dissed?

    Is the English language being massacred by the young, the linguistically untidy and anyone who uses the Internet? Absolutely.
    Is that anything new? Hardly.
    Many words and expressions in common parlance today would have raised the hackles of language scolds in the not-so-distant past. For evidence, let’s look at some examples from recent newspaper articles.

    July 31, 2014

  • 'Too big to fail' equals 'too eager to borrow'

    Four years ago this month, President Barack Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law, promising that the 848-page financial law would “put a stop to taxpayer bailouts once and for all,” he said. But recently, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren told a Detroit crowd that “the biggest banks are even bigger than they were when they got too big to fail in 2008.”
    Who’s right?

    July 30, 2014

  • Sheltons travel for better life for family

    Some time around 1865 a mixed-race African American couple, William and Mary Shelton, made their way from Mississippi to east Texas. Nothing is known for certain of their origins in he Magnolia state, or the circumstances under which they began their new lives in Texas.

    July 29, 2014

  • Film critic Turan produces book

    Kenneth Turan, who is the film critic for National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition,” has written a book “Not to be Missed, Fifty-Four Favorites from a Life Time of Film.” His list of movies span the gamut from the beginnings of filmmaking through the present day.
    There are some surprising omissions on his list. While he includes two films, “A Touch of Evil” and Chimes at Midnight” made by Orson Welles, and one, “The Third Man,” that Welles starred in but did not direct. He did not however, include “Citizen Kane,” that was the first movie Welles made, that is  often cited by both film critics and historians as a favorite film.

    July 28, 2014

  • Logan County’s disputed zone

    Watchers of “Star Trek” may recall the episode from the original series entitled, “Day of the Dove.” In this episode, Captain Kirk and his crew are forced by a series of circumstances into a confrontation with the Klingons. The conflict eventually resolves after Kirk realizes that the circumstances have been intentionally designed by an alien force which feeds off negative emotions, especially fear and anger. Kirk and his crew communicate this fact to the Klingons and the conflict subsides. No longer feeding upon confrontation, the alien force is weakened and successfully driven away.

    July 28, 2014

  • Russell leads in Sun poll

    Polling results of an unscientific poll at show that Steve Russell, GOP candidate for the 5th District congressional seat, is in the lead with 57 percent of the vote ahead of the Aug. 26 runoff election. Thirty readers participated in the online poll.

    July 28, 2014

  • Healthier and Wealthier? Not in Oklahoma

    Increased copays, decreased coverage, diminished health care access, reduced provider budgets and increased frustration are all the outcomes of the Legislature’s 2014 health care funding decisions. Unlike some years in the past when a languishing state economy forced legislators into making cuts, the undesirable outcomes this year could easily have been avoided.

    July 26, 2014

  • Medicaid reform a necessity

    Historically, education spending by the state of Oklahoma has been the largest budget item. This is no longer the case. In recent years, the state of Oklahoma spends more on Medicaid (operated by the Oklahoma Health Care Authority) than common education and higher education combined, according to the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

    July 25, 2014


The runoff race for the 5th District congressional seat is set for Aug. 26. If the voting were today, which candidate would you support?

Al McAffrey
Tom Guild
     View Results